PDA

View Full Version : Canada's next protection frontier


gunsmoke2
May 11th, 2002, 11:08 PM
THE GLOBE & MAIL

May 9, 2002

Canada's next protection frontier

Radio waves from deep space

by Eric Reguly

A friend of mine just moved from the United States to Canada and managed to smuggle contraband, in plain view, across the border. At least he assumed it was contraband. His car was equipped with a satellite radio receiver, the latest rage in the U.S. media market. For $9.99 (U.S.) a month, it gives the subscriber the choice of 100-plus channels, most of them commercial free.

His service, from XM Radio, is not licensed in Canada but it works well here. Satellite signals have a healthy disrespect for borders and XM's birds transmit for several hundred kilometres into Canadian territory. He urged me to drive to the nearest American city, buy the system and set up a phony U.S. billing address. No more sitting in traffic listening to commercial radio and its high-decibel ads for car tires, lotteries and contraceptives. If you want channels that broadcast exclusively reggae, 1960s rock, special studio sessions with Jethro Tull, Motorhead or, God forbid, Yanni, you've got them. So are all-news, sports and comedy channels, from the BBC to NASCAR Radio.

I'm sold. The problem is that the Canadian government and its broadcast regulator, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, isn't. In case you hadn't noticed, the Supreme Court of Canada just ruled that the use of unlicensed equipment to receive U.S. satellite TV, offered by DirecTV and others, is illegal. The grey market suddenly became black. Unless you want to risk criminal status, you will have to buy your satellite programming from licensed Canadian distributors such as Bell ExpressVu or Star Choice.

Given the court ruling, it's impossible to imagine that American satellite radio would win if it tried to gain a licence in Canada where American satellite TV lost. My friend with the XM Radio box in his car, if not a criminal now, seems destined to become one.

Given the billions of dollars in startup costs for satellite radio, there's about zero chance that a mass market, home-grown version could be launched (the CRTC has licensed two satellite audio services, CBC Galaxie and Shaw DMX, but they are small and not available in cars, the one market that counts). The Canadian market just isn't big enough. The good news for Canadian radio buffs is that U.S. satellite radio is there for the taking if you have the energy to drive over the border and buy the hardware, which starts at about $200. At this stage, the CRTC isn't prepared to make a stink about the new service because it's a brand new industry with few Canadian subscribers.

Watch this change, though, if the service becomes widespread and Canadian commercial radio companies, such as Standard Broadcasting and CHUM, start losing market share. Canadian broadcasters hate the idea of competing; far easier to play the Canadian culture card and get foreign competitors banned from the market.

Satellite radio could get really big really fast. An April report by Robertson Stephens, a U.S. investment firm, said that "[the] satellite radio market has substantial potential . . The battle between satellite and terrestrial radio should be heated." The firm expects half a million U.S. subscribers by the end of this year, rising to 10 million by 2005 and 37 million by 2010. The growth should come from cars. Indeed, the auto makers have signed on as partners of both XM Radio and Sirius, the only two players in the U.S. satellite radio market.

General Motors plans to include XM radios as optional equipment in many of its 2003 models. Ford has teamed up with Sirius and will probably offer the radios in its 2004 lineup. The tens of millions of commuters trapped on highways and roads across America represent a huge untapped market for XM and Sirius.

Only a few months ago, satellite radio was little more than a concept backed by a licence from the U.S. Federal Communications Commission. The idea had been around for years, but the funding and logistical challenges were daunting. XM, for example, spent $800-million just to launch two satellites from a floating launch site in the Pacific. Sirius, which has invested $1.8-billion in startup costs, had to go to Kazakhstan to find discount launch rockets.

One of the industry pioneers was David Margolese, a Vancouver native and university dropout. More than a decade ago, he formed a company in New York called CD Radio and started to fight for FCC approvals. In 1997, CD Radio and its only rival, XM, overcame resistance from the commercial radio lobby and received the coveted licences.

At that point, CD Radio was the clear leader but squandered its early mover advantage. The company has since recruited new management (Mr. Margolese went from chief executive officer to chairman) and was renamed Sirius. XM, meanwhile, forged ahead and began national broadcasting last November. At the end of March, it had 76,000 subscribers and expects 350,000 by the fourth quarter. Sirius began limited broadcasting three months ago. The stock prices of both companies has dived on the Nasdaq because of the horrendous development costs and investors' fears that profits are many years off, if they come at all.

Recruiting Canadian subscribers, of course, is about the last thing XM and Sirius are concerned about as they roll out their service. But both companies admit Canada is a natural extension of their market. The CRTC may determine otherwise. If satellite radio catches on in Canada, watch the commercial radio companies plead for protection.



GS2

amex97
May 12th, 2002, 10:53 AM
I agree with you that the Sirius orbital path is much superior to the low look angle XM sats. I recently installed a Sirius ready Kenwood in anticipation of purchasing the sat reciever and antenna and hope to get things up and flying in the next month or so. I'm also hoping the antenna will see through my Jeep YJ hardtop so it can remain hidden :(

You have to wonder what the average Canadian is thinking as he walks into a local Future Shop etc and sees these sat ready receivers sitting everywhere but no way to get it. He also gets bombarded XM adverts off CNN and TechTV further getting him cranked up. I predict the CRTC dealing with this sooner than later and hundreds of thousands more Canadians becoming criminals.

jones07
May 12th, 2002, 11:16 AM
I Live in the USA, And thur out this there's something I do not
understand. Canada is Free you guys get to vote in and out the reps
that do not vote your point of view. If so many canadians wounld
like access to US programming why not just vote the BUMS out of
office and vote poeple that see things the way many canadians seem
to ? why should FREE people have to worry about if an antenna can
be seen on their homes or in their car.?

gunsmoke2
May 12th, 2002, 04:04 PM
Hi Geo2,


For now the bottom line is that the Government or ExpressVu don't care about satellite encrypted radio signals as it is not competition


They don't care about C- Band as it is not competition.


It only matters when the Monopolies yell they need financial protection.



GS2

duffy
May 12th, 2002, 04:23 PM
Just a curiosity question.

Is not an AM radio a device that decodes signals that are relayed by satellite to some ground based provider that then transmits a signal to be received by all?

If these signals are approved, or deemed illegal in the broad sense interpretation of the gov, does this not mean there is there is discrimination as far as enforcing the law and making all those that own a radio lawbreakers?

gunsmoke2
May 12th, 2002, 07:14 PM
Only encrypted radio signals delivered by Satellite that originate outside of Canada and not licensed by the CRTC are now illegal according to the SC decision



GS2

amex97
May 12th, 2002, 08:16 PM
I think Duffy ment XM radio not AM. XM is ecrypted.

BeamReader
May 12th, 2002, 09:19 PM
There can be no limitations on testing within your own place and privacy.

If I can go and watch all the entertainment or movies at the local cinema (not Cable or Canadian Satellite), why can't I do the same at my convenience with American Satellite providers. The question at the end of the day is Access to Content . It is your right to such content at your convenience, which is at stake.

Testers are everywhere,
- Listening to extra-terrestrials
- Amateur radio bands
- People behind dictatorships listening to freedom broadcasts
- People sucking from the airwaves in their homes what they can

Testers do not ask the Satellite providers or others to,
- Provide a test signal to their house
- Make it easy for testing
- Use breakable encryption
- Limit the frequency or strength of their ECMs

Testers with rest of the commoners,
- Own air waves and their civilized use for the benefit of all
- Satellite providers are loaned (licensed) the use of airwaves
- Guarantees of constitutional rights and freedoms are not subjugate to satellite provider business plans

The fallacy of controlling airwaves is incredulous. Canadian satellite and cable providers all put together cannot create buying power of the DTVs and Echostars of this world. This directly determines quality of available programming and pricing. The situation becomes a farce and a joke for ethnic programming.

SatelliteSheila and AlmightyRock need to get their heads out of business generated headlock.