Receieved letter !!!!!!!!! (HELP) !!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

[Nijayli]

THANKS.

[Bone Daddy]

Don't tell them anything more, do a search on TTRK he has very good posts in the freedoms forums..Pretty much a step by step on how to deal with the letters..And I'm not treating you like an idiot, but scroll to the top of the page and use the search button up there(4th one over)Search by person then TTRK...I saw it was your first post..

[Nijayli]

that.

[sirjohna]

You now have a big problem, you just admitted buying something.

I suggest you contact a lawyer and have him do all the talking now. Otherwise you are getting yourself in a big hole then you are going to be able to dig out of.

[jones07]

To late to worry now,You give youself up. Pay the $3.5K. Some times you bite the bear and other times the bear bites you. I know how you feel. Two years ago the IRS said I owned uncle sam $475usd. I felt I don't. But to get a tax lawyer plus time lost at work it was easier to pay it. I did not feel good about. but to get the IRS out of my life an get it over with I slept better that nite.

Good luck with whatever you end up doing.

[Nijayli]

Thanks,

[Nijayli]

opop

[To The Real King!!]

Hi Nijayli,

I wont tell you what you should do since that is your responsibility, but I WILL give you my opinion.

The fact that you purchased an EMU board is not an admission that you stole TV at all. In fact an EMU board cannot steal TV without a Computer, a ISO-7816 card reader and a program that is designed to steal TV.

There are many legitimate uses for an EMU board and some of them are listed here:

http://www.legal-rights.org/DTV/emulator.html

However you DID NOT have to use it for anything, which I presume is what you are saying. People buy things all the time and are misinformed about what it does, thought it would let you develop a smart card program for computer security (wrongly as its just one of the tools) or because someone told you that you needed it with a satellite system because they saw one on some ones satellite and thought it was needed. There are many reasons including misinformation that you could Have bought it and they don't matter at all. The fact is that you did not us it, it cannot steal TV alone without many other components and the ONLY purpose of paying them any money is in damages for having stolen their signal. If you did that then pay up but if you did not then advise your lawyer of this and advise him that you wont be paying damages for something that you did NOT DO.

But if you do that you may have to go to court and testify to that fact. You may also need a university smart card programmer who can be qualified as a court "expert" and he will explain to the court that you could not possibly steal TV with this. And if you testify that you do not have any of the other needed components then you should be released without any damages.

They have ONLY an invoice stating that you purchased one small component which by itself can do nothing. They have no evidence that you have the computer, the smart card reader or the program designed to steal TV and I assume you do not have these things. So how could a judge find you guilty of doing something that you could not do. And if you have no DirecTV® sub then all the better. How can you steal DirecTV® with a dish network system or no system? I don't know if you have that or not but with just an EMU you can do nothing at all. Do NOT let them bluff you into paying money for something you did not do and can not be convicted of. Lawyers are LOOKING for good cases and I would say your case is an EXCELLENT one.

For some reason people seem to feel that they need to settle these matters but there is NO NEED to settle if you have done nothing wrong. And the cost they ask is possibly more than it would cost to go to court for the very short trial this would be.

If it has to cost $3500.00 would you rather not pay it and be absolved than admit to something you did NOT do.

You have to decide what to do but I will be dammed if I can understand why people would pay $3500.00 and admit to something they did not do when they could not possibly have done what DirecTV® accuse you of. If people pay this for nothing then it amounts to no more than blackmail and where does that stop. Why not again next year since you would be an easy "mark".

That's just my opinion on this but you are NOT cooked for admitting to this purchase. So what if you did nothing wronghttp://www.legal-rights.org/images/ttrk.gif

http://www.legal-rights.org/images/ttrkblack.gif

Thanks & Good Luck,
http://www.legal-rights.org/images/rotate_rib.gif
To The REAL King!!

Freedom has nothing to fear from the truth!
http://www.legal-rights.org/images/satelliterights.gif
http://www.legal-rights.org/images/freedomblack.gif

Please REMEMBER OUR WAR HERO’S (http://www.legal-rights.org/remembrance.html) <-- Click here Please!


Please DONATE for the SUPREME COURT CENSORSHIP BATTLE (http://www.legal-rights.org/donation.html) <-- Click here Please!

Por favor dona para la BATALLA EN LA SUPREMA CORTE (http://www.legal-rights.org/donation.html)<-- Haz Click aqui!

[Nijayli]

ppppppp

[NLogN]

I remember hearing that statements that are made during settlement negotiations are not admissible into evidence. Maybe you should ask you lawyer about that?

[JD490]

I don't understand why an attorney would call them and tell them that. This is the exact thing they like to hear now they will stick to that $3500.00 for ever. Your attorney should have asked them for proof you have broken laws, or damaged there client. Your attorney probably thought he could reason with them. Remember they are accusing you of being in possession of a "ILLEGAL DEVICE" as of the date of the letter. Being that is when they claim they found out about your so called "ILLEGAL PURCHASE". They have no proof you even have the device that they claim is illegal. These people are out for one thing MONEY!!

[flashlighting]

That amount sounds out "out of the ball park", i'm going thru a settlement "round and round it goes" I have a very reputable attorney and my agreement has been stated for much less, key to any papers that you will sign "must state from date on certified letter, any purchases prior to that specific date even if you have purchased items from outside the U.S. that they are unawhere of, protect yourselves from any future 'criminal suits"

[Bone Daddy]

Listen to TTRK he is the man...Just because you have this device doesn't mean you stole TV..Take it to court and win..

[Nijayli]

[QUOTE][

[Nijayli]

llll

[Nijayli]

[

[Andrew8468]

If everything you have stated is true, then find yourself a brand new lawyer. Find one that isn't buddy buddy with DTV and fight them!

PS Stop posting gibberish

[Nijayli]

[QUOTE][i]

[Nijayli]

[ooooooo

[Nijayli]

[

[Nijayli]

[bbbb

[Nijayli]

[