PDA

View Full Version : Customer accused of piracy strikes back with Suit"


jd3
September 26th, 2002, 05:37 PM
Found this on a different forum

Customer accused of piracy strikes back with Suit"

Customer accused of piracy strikes back
Cablevision Sued - By Harry Berkowitz - September 26, 2002
A customer lawsuit filed in federal court claims Cablevision Systems Corp. has been forcing some subscribers to pay penalties for stealing cable TV service without the company having proof they were doing so.

Cira Calabrese, the plaintiff named in the lawsuit, which is seeking class-action status, says Cablevision demanded $3,000 and threatened to sue her even though she never had the unauthorized cable decoding device the company claimed she used.

The suit against Cablevision, filed Tuesday in Central Islip by attorney Harry Binder of Ronkonkoma, says hundreds and possibly thousands of customers are in the same situation as Calabrese, who is a Cablevision customer living in Tappan, N.Y.

Bethpage-based Cablevision has been among the most aggressive cable operators in cracking down on cable piracy, which the industry says costs companies billions of dollars a year in lost payments.

A Cablevision spokesman declined comment but in the past officials have called cable theft a serious problem.

Cablevision uses investigators and undercover operations to catch businesses that sell "black-box" cable signal converter-decoders used in cable piracy. Through the courts, it makes them pay millions of dollars in damages and penalties and hand over lists of people who bought the devices.

The company uses those lists and it also measures cable "leakage" to try to track down people and businesses, such as bars, that are illegally getting cable service, including premium channels, movies and sporting events, without paying.

While Cablevision "makes sure that it has evidence that a business violated the Communications Act before accusing the business of cable theft, the same is not true when accuses a person of cable theft," the suit states. Cablevision "does not go through the expense of conducting an investigation of an individual subscriber before accusing him or her of cable theft because does not foresee a large payoff coming from such a subscriber."

Cablevision threatens to sue the subscriber for up to $10,000 per violation and to cut off cable service, the suit claims. Many subscribers pay a penalty, even if they did not pirate cable service, to avoid the expenses of a lawsuit, it claims. The suit against Cablevision seeks to recover what it estimates as at least $3 million in damages.

In 2000, Cablevision sent warnings to 5,000 customers it suspected of buying and using the signal decoders, the company has said in the past. It collected between $1,500 and $3,000 from each of 2,000 customers who agreed to settle and surrender the illegal equipment.

Typically, a pirating customer pays for some level of basic cable service and then uses the decoder to unscramble signals for other channels.

In an interview last year, Robert Astarita, senior vice president of corporate security at Cablevision and a former FBI agent, said, "Cable theft represents real monetary losses to legitimate cable customers and to cable providers."

Source: http://www.newsday.com/business/printedition/ny-bzcab262940861sep26,0,1433803.story?coll=ny-business-print

Speedp3
September 26th, 2002, 07:18 PM
Bless this gal and send a donation to help her with this suit
:D

Thor
September 26th, 2002, 07:38 PM
-_________________________________________________________________
The suit against Cablevision, filed Tuesday in Central Islip by attorney Harry Binder of Ronkonkoma, says hundreds and possibly thousands of customers are in the same situation as Calabrese, who is a Cablevision customer living in Tappan, N.Y.
___________________________________________________________________
I wonder if Harry is interested in taking on DTV...lol
Seems to me that there are a lot of simularities here.;)

gunsmoke2
September 26th, 2002, 08:26 PM
I'm sure he would be interested if someone contacted him.



GS2

pontiac
September 27th, 2002, 03:20 PM
Harry appears to be the author of the article. Maybe someone can search and see who is representing the alleged "guilty" party.

Kool Aid
September 27th, 2002, 03:24 PM
From the original post,



The suit against Cablevision, filed Tuesday in Central Islip by attorney Harry Binder of Ronkonkoma...

BubbaHill
September 27th, 2002, 04:29 PM
I think this is the same person. Found it on martindale.com

Harry J. Binder
Binder & Binder
Ronkonkoma, New York
(Suffolk Co.)

Born 1948; Admitted 1972; New York University, B.B.A.; Cornell University, J.D.

jd3
September 27th, 2002, 07:26 PM
Here's a post from the same forum with his phone number
Just my thoughts on the above Article ...
"Way to Go!"

I think that anyone who has been sent a Direct TV letter should also consider doing this exact same thing, and bring it to the forefront of the medias attention just as these guys have done.

I contacted the office of Mr.Binder moments ago at 631-361-6699 to make sure it was the correct attorneys office. I spoke with a woman in the "LTD Department" and briefly explained to her the plight of the DTV Letters. Their already looking into class action suit against the cable company, and with it being so close to the DTV actions, its what their interested in, so give em a call.

While it would be an extremely 'ballsy' move - I think it would teach them a lesson that they simply cannot go around deflamating the character of anyone WITHOUT first having substantiated proof.

In my opinion, those of you who have gotten such treatment, should make the effort and contact the attorney who is listed in this article and briefly explain to him that you saw the coverage on this suit, and you also have a similiar situation, and get his input.

I think an -extreme- class action suit could be made of this.

Just my .02 and if you follow it, let us know the outcomes

stormtrooper
October 4th, 2002, 06:47 AM
Any New Yorkers whom recieved these letters should contact this Law office.

tbshooter
October 4th, 2002, 06:21 PM
Originally posted by stormtrooper
Any New Yorkers whom recieved these letters should contact this Law office.

What about other states like Mass., Connecticut or New Jersey?

Can people still join the class action if they settled?

m_jonis
October 5th, 2002, 09:24 AM
Probably not because the settlement agreement stipulates that you release any claims against DirecTV.

JD490
October 6th, 2002, 06:07 PM
If a class action lawsuit was won could the plaintiff get Dave to agree to set aside all settlements to settle the current class action lawsuit. I know that is a long shot, but if Dave were to loose millions in a lawsuit its possible. Also what if Dave were to go out of business or be bought out by someone else and the new company just eliminates DirecTV. Would the agreement still be in force?

RADIOMAN_NYC
October 24th, 2002, 02:35 PM
I'm all for it, I have received such a letter from Cablevision & I'm in the same position. I also know someone who worked in an office environment where a secretary signed for a package that was addressed to him, and they claim that he received, used, and defrauded the company intentionally. He has recently settled for $ 2,000.00. Of course it would cost 30 - 40 K just to fight them, so they get an easy win....... It's not fair & someone's gota stop them....

Go Harry, more power to you !!!!!!;) ;) ;) ;) ;)

Mechanic
October 31st, 2002, 02:14 PM
http://news.com.com/2100-1023-963884.html?tag=cd_mh