Sadaam accepts resolution??

[georgeww]

I just heard that Sadaam has accepted the U.N. resolution.
I think he doesnt know what he has agreed to.
From what I understand the U.N. resolution stated that the US could send troops in to enforce the disarmament inspection.
I believe Sadaam is going to start bitchin as soon as the inspectors get there and then there will be a big media blitz and then the war will start.
Anyway, I just figured this was something different to talk about.

[condmca]

What I know is when all is said and done, the Iraqi people will be happy to be the second beacon of hope for all middle easterners to envy once Saddam Hussein is gone.

[Ambivalent]

Huh? What he said...

[condmca]

I said, the Iraqi people will welcome democracy when Saddam is gone.
Nation Building just might be our forte. We've done amazing things in a short time in Afghanistan. Let's do it again.
;)

[Ambivalent]

Originally posted by condmca
I said, the Iraqi people will welcome democracy when Saddam is gone.
Nation Building just might be our forte. We've done amazing things in a short time in Afghanistan. Let's do it again.
;)

I hope you are right and the cost in American lives will be worth the end result.

[georgeww]

I have been thinking lately that Iraq may not put up such a fight when its all said and done.
Ive said before that if we do this right there wont be many US casualties.
Outside of a biological or chemical attack Iraq doesnt pose much of a threat to American troops.
Ibelieve you are going to see a regime change that will be enforced as much politically as it is militarily.
Osama probably will put up more of a fight than Sadaam will when its all said and done.I HOPE!!
Look at the Iraqi Army, not much there.
Bush Sr. messed up sending 750,000 troops, Bush Jr. wont make that same mistake in my opinion.
The problem with Iraq accepting this resolution is that everyone knows Sadaam has some things to hide. The question is that when the inspectors go in, will they find them because if they find them then Sadaam is gone and if they dont then what will happen then?
Sadaam will play this game because he is a player, right?

[martycone]

I think he's farming out his evil in another country. Having someone else make his weapons of mass distruction.

[ozzy67]

Iran, Iraq, China, its all the same, right?

[mmmmkaaay]

I hope you are right and the cost in American lives will be worth the end result.


Its amazing what is done for the sake of oil :(:(:(

agendas agendas...

[ozzy67]

Unless you have a bicycle you gotta have it.
I believe that there wont be many lives lost if it is done right and the Iraqi people will be better of without Sadaam in power.

[Sgt_Stedenko]

I think he allowed the inspectors back in to delay an invasion. He wants the extra time to build up his arsenal.

[WYATT]

Anti-War Group Threatens To Sue British Government


The Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament said Tuesday it will take the British government to court unless it promises not to attack Iraq without U.N. approval.
The anti-war group is basing its challenge on a legal opinion from the law firm that includes British Prime Minister Tony Blair's wife among its partners.

Two lawyers from the firm argue that the resolution the Security Council agreed to on Nov. 7 does not authorize the use of force to disarm Iraq.

The resolution threatens unspecified "serious consequences" if Iraq doesn't cooperate with weapons inspectors.

A letter from the group threatens legal action if it doesn't receive a written guarantee from British leaders within a week.

SOURCE: CLICK2HOUSTON & AP. Nov. 19, 2002.


"Serious consequences" without force? Haven't they tried that one already??? :Z