Satellite Wars: Culture vs. Expression [Archive]

View Full Version : Satellite Wars: Culture vs. Expression

incredible

June 16th, 2003, 03:33 PM

Very interesting reading.....

http://members.rogers.com/02cv228526cm1/june16/june_16_03_p105.jpg
http://members.rogers.com/02cv228526cm1/june16/june_16_03_p106.jpg
http://members.rogers.com/02cv228526cm1/june16/june_16_03_p107.jpg
http://members.rogers.com/02cv228526cm1/june16/june_16_03_p108.jpg
http://members.rogers.com/02cv228526cm1/june16/june_16_03_p109.jpg
http://members.rogers.com/02cv228526cm1/june16/june_16_03_p110.jpg
http://members.rogers.com/02cv228526cm1/june16/june_16_03_p111.jpg
http://members.rogers.com/02cv228526cm1/june16/june_16_03_p112.jpg
http://members.rogers.com/02cv228526cm1/june16/june_16_03_p113.jpg
http://members.rogers.com/02cv228526cm1/june16/june_16_03_p114.jpg
http://members.rogers.com/02cv228526cm1/june16/june_16_03_p115.jpg
http://members.rogers.com/02cv228526cm1/june16/june_16_03_p116.jpg
http://members.rogers.com/02cv228526cm1/june16/june_16_03_p117.jpg
http://members.rogers.com/02cv228526cm1/june16/june_16_03_p118.jpg
http://members.rogers.com/02cv228526cm1/june16/june_16_03_p119.jpg
http://members.rogers.com/02cv228526cm1/june16/june_16_03_p120.jpg

Dean_M_Love

June 16th, 2003, 06:20 PM

...excellent and well reasoned thinking....

...will it be possible to convince the Supreme Court of this authors way of thinking?

RiseStar

June 16th, 2003, 07:52 PM

what was this published in?

gunsmoke2

June 16th, 2003, 11:35 PM

The author the way I read it says 9(1)(c) infinges on section 2b on freedom of expression to Canadians who pay a fee to access US signals but doesn't pass the test on infingement on 2b on Canadians who access US signals for free..

GS2

incredible

June 17th, 2003, 07:25 AM

Vanderbilt journal of entertainment law & practice. It's an entertainment industry lawyers trade magazine, so of course they want people to subscribe.

To The Real King!!

June 17th, 2003, 09:32 AM

Hi GS2,

In the conclusion it calls on parliament to change the law to bring it into conformity with both the grey and the black markets on Page 115.

This is in fact correct as the law does not comply with the requirements of either the way it stands now.

This was written by a gentleman described on page 116 who even gives a contact. Email address for himself. I would like to get a full sized copy that is clear and readable since a lot of this can be used directly as not only is the paper well written but it is also clear as to the authorities it uses to justify this position. This says exactly what we have all long believed is the correct interpretation and that the government is required to CHANGE THE LAW to make viewing without paying illegal and it does not seem to claim that they can stop those who pay for the signal from receiving it, if the charter is to be respected. At least that is the way I read the document.

What do you guys think the conclusion is?http://www.legal-rights.org/images/ttrk.gif
http://www.legal-rights.org/images/niceday.gif
Thanks & Good Luck ,

<a href="mailto:ttrk@legal-rights.org">To The REAL King!!</a>

Freedom has nothing to fear from the truth!
http://www.legal-rights.org/images/satelliterights.gif

http://www.legal-rights.org/images/freedomblack.gif
Now open with lots of useful resources at your disposal AT:
http://www.legal-rights.org

http://www.legal-rights.org/images/usflagwav.gif UNITED WE STAND http://www.legal-rights.org/images/canada.gif

Please REMEMBER OUR WAR HERO’S (http://www.legal-rights.org/remembrance.html) <-- Click here Please!

[url=http:

seele

June 17th, 2003, 02:05 PM

wow great read!
intersting views well writen i hope the government or someone with power reads this....maybe they can sway some minds:D

gunsmoke2

June 17th, 2003, 02:59 PM

Hi TTRK

Yes I read that but as it stands until the law is changed if ever the author put his test of 3 requirements for 2b charter infingement on US companies not licensed by the CRTC and concluded that paying for it passed the test he used and not paying for did not pass his test.

He is only one person who has his view and opinions while many others might conclude otherwize like the comment by the judge in the R.E. case in Sask. As long as we have the Liberals catering to Bev I don't think they ( Parliment ) with change anything if they win on the Charter. If they lose they may change it and make it worse then before. They don't seem to care about Canadians versus big donations from companies.

GS2