New Star Analyst Rankings for sirius

[doberman007]

Just out today.....

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/sa?s=siri

[Herman Hollerith]

"doberman007" <sirius007@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1140447477.122570.59120@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Just out today.....
>
> http://finance.yahoo.com/q/sa?s=siri
>

LOL.

What's that mean, Dobie?

ROTF.

[doberman007]

Frontmed.....

How come you did not create another new alias for this post?????

What does it mean?????

I will educate you.

It is a list of analysts that have a history of putting together
accurate forcasts for the equity.

It is that plain and that simple.......Nothing to Roll on the floor and
laugh about. It is simply information that someone following sirius
should be aware of.

If an analyst has a track record of calling the shots correctly, then
that is something a prudent investor would want to know.

So, you can roll on the floor if you like.....in fact, you can roll on
the floor with all 17 of your aliases and have an orgy for all I care.
Perhaps that is somrthing that O & A could use to spice up their show.

So, to put into summary:

1. The list is made up of the analysts that follow Sirius, and have
exhibited a certain level of accuracy with regard to their earnings
estimates.

2. You seem to feel that knowing which analysts have an accurate track
record does not matter.

3. You and 17 other aliases are now in the midst of an orgy.

I think that about sums it up

[Herman Hollerith]

Dobie

You're kind of touchy.

New NPD figures must be out, huh?

[doberman007]

Frontmed....

Not touchy at all.

You asked a question, with yet another new name, and I answered it.

Why is it that you are finding the need to create a whole host of
names? What is it you are trying to hide from?

NPD is just fine for January. The last week was down as compared to
the first three weeks, but that was due to inventory. The telling sign
is that even without having inventory, Sirius still outdid XM.

First week in Feb is a bit off as well, but nothing to worry about from
a Sirius perspective.

Your dream seeing a 60/40 split in favor of XM simply will not happen.
Even the ones they will be giving away to Circuit City and Best Buy
employess will not help XM.

The world Series is not until October......Mabey they will have some
big Opening day give-aways for MLB.

[J. Fowler]

doberman007 wrote:
> Frontmed.....
>
> How come you did not create another new alias for this post?????
>
> What does it mean?????
>
> I will educate you.
>
> It is a list of analysts that have a history of putting together
> accurate forcasts for the equity.
>
> It is that plain and that simple.......Nothing to Roll on the floor and
> laugh about. It is simply information that someone following sirius
> should be aware of.
>
> If an analyst has a track record of calling the shots correctly, then
> that is something a prudent investor would want to know.
>
> So, you can roll on the floor if you like.....in fact, you can roll on
> the floor with all 17 of your aliases and have an orgy for all I care.
> Perhaps that is somrthing that O & A could use to spice up their show.
>
> So, to put into summary:
>
> 1. The list is made up of the analysts that follow Sirius, and have
> exhibited a certain level of accuracy with regard to their earnings
> estimates.
>
> 2. You seem to feel that knowing which analysts have an accurate track
> record does not matter.
>
> 3. You and 17 other aliases are now in the midst of an orgy.

Please list all 17 aliases, otherwise the rest of us should consider you
a liar/exaggerator. Twist and spin it as you will, 3 vs 17 only shows
you word means nothing here.

[Herman Hollerith]

>
> Why is it that you are finding the need to create a whole host of
> names? What is it you are trying to hide from?

Don't get balled up about it. Everyone here knows which posts are from me.

Just think of it as a way for me to honor great computer scientists ;)

> NPD is just fine for January. The last week was down as compared to
> the first three weeks, but that was due to inventory. The telling sign
> is that even without having inventory, Sirius still outdid XM.
>
> First week in Feb is a bit off as well, but nothing to worry about from
> a Sirius perspective.

It is nothing to worry about; however, it does suggest [strongly] that the
"Stern Effect" *IS* a one-quarter event. As the new XM hardware comes out,
Oprah's channel starts to heat up a bit, MLB season takes off, etc., Sirius
will see its retail share slide.

> Your dream seeing a 60/40 split in favor of XM simply will not happen.
> Even the ones they will be giving away to Circuit City and Best Buy
> employess will not help XM.

I don't know about 60/40. But I do believe it will be back into that range
(perhaps 65/35 some quarters) -- and as XM's OEM exclusives start to take
hold at year end, the total market share really will trend heavily toward
XM.

I'm not sure what you're thinking -- I guess you think that Sirius is going
to hang on to its recent retail share gains even after all the Stern minions
have followed him. That just isn't being realistic.

Apparently, you don't agree that a 60/40 (XM) retail share is likely. What
are you thinking it will be? 50/50? 40/60?

[David]

On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 16:41:27 GMT, "Herman Hollerith"
<herman@nomail.com> wrote:


>Apparently, you don't agree that a 60/40 (XM) retail share is likely. What
>are you thinking it will be? 50/50? 40/60?
>
>
It doesn'treally matter as XM is apparently unable to monetize their
big bad quasiexclusive deals.

[doberman007]

Fowler.......

LOL........You seem to take things far to literally.....the 17 is just
pointing out that there are more than one

The new names are comming up quite quickly

We have Frontmed
We Have the Leg_breaker
We Have Don Knuth
We Have Hreman Hollerith
We have Chuck Babbage
We have No Down-Time

Shall I go on??????

Frontmed has already stated that he will be/has created a whole list of
aliases.

Ask yourself why someone would do this.

[Dave Zass]

> It is nothing to worry about; however, it does suggest [strongly] that the
> "Stern Effect" *IS* a one-quarter event.

You love spouting this BS. The surge of those who signed up specifically to
hear Stern will obviously taper off. The rate of new subscriptions will
slow. That's not in question.

Your continued assertion that the "Stern Effect" is over is laughable, at
best. The Stern Effect will be over when he decides to stop broadcasting.

[J. Fowler]

doberman007 wrote:
> Ask yourself why someone would do this.

You mean exaggerate? 17? makes one wonder about anything you post.

[Herman Hollerith]

> You love spouting this BS. The surge of those who signed up specifically
to
> hear Stern will obviously taper off. The rate of new subscriptions will
> slow. That's not in question.

Exactly what I've been saying. Others here are claiming that these retail
share gains are permanent. I say bull----.


> Your continued assertion that the "Stern Effect" is over is laughable, at
> best. The Stern Effect will be over when he decides to stop broadcasting.

The Stern Effect is essentially over. He is, at this point, preaching to
the converted, has a much smaller audience -- maybe 1/6 of his previous
audience, scarcely more than Opie & Anthony have, and just doesn't have the
drawing power he had when he was on free radio.

When he has an audience as small as O&A, he simply isn't going to be able to
keep getting better guests. Meanwhile, O&A are putting on people like Dale
Earnhardt Jr & Jimme Johnson.

Why, I wouldn't be surprised if Dylan turned up on O&A in a few weeks...

[David]

On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:32:30 GMT, "Herman Hollerith"
<herman@nomail.com> wrote:

>> You love spouting this BS. The surge of those who signed up specifically
>to
>> hear Stern will obviously taper off. The rate of new subscriptions will
>> slow. That's not in question.
>
>Exactly what I've been saying. Others here are claiming that these retail
>share gains are permanent. I say bull----.
>
>
>> Your continued assertion that the "Stern Effect" is over is laughable, at
>> best. The Stern Effect will be over when he decides to stop broadcasting.
>
>The Stern Effect is essentially over. He is, at this point, preaching to
>the converted, has a much smaller audience -- maybe 1/6 of his previous
>audience, scarcely more than Opie & Anthony have, and just doesn't have the
>drawing power he had when he was on free radio.
>
>When he has an audience as small as O&A, he simply isn't going to be able to
>keep getting better guests. Meanwhile, O&A are putting on people like Dale
>Earnhardt Jr & Jimme Johnson.
>
>Why, I wouldn't be surprised if Dylan turned up on O&A in a few weeks...
>
>
You continue to be the most delusional cheerleader on the squad. The
initial Stern pop resulted in at minimum 800,000 hard core fanatics
who, while subbing for Stern at first, have now been dazzled by the
rest of the lineup. Not unlike otherl SDARS nubies they will sell the
Dog like there's no tomrrow.

These are prime radio consumers; the K-Rockers and the X one-oh-wow
crowd. Not blue hairs who never stray from the local AM nostalgia
station.

If Dylan shows up on Dopey and Stupid, it'll be because he made a
wrong turn looking for a good place to get high.

[Admiral Grace Murray Hopper]

> You continue to be the most delusional cheerleader on the squad. The
> initial Stern pop resulted in at minimum 800,000 hard core fanatics
> who, while subbing for Stern at first, have now been dazzled by the
> rest of the lineup. Not unlike otherl SDARS nubies they will sell the
> Dog like there's no tomrrow.

Perhaps 800K. But they are no more "dazzled" with Sirius than XM devotees
are to XM -- and there are a hell of lot more XMers than Sirius listeners.

> These are prime radio consumers; the K-Rockers and the X one-oh-wow
> crowd. Not blue hairs who never stray from the local AM nostalgia
> station.

At this point, women are looking like a pretty important demo on SDARS, and
Sirius has nothing for them.

> If Dylan shows up on Dopey and Stupid, it'll be because he made a
> wrong turn looking for a good place to get high.
>

I don't know about that; they had Dale Jr & Jimmie Johnson on a couple days
ago. They're pretty big, right?

[doberman007]

Fowler.....

Lets see:

Dray
Timecalc
Bolo
trucky

and I have not even touched all of the aliases he has used on sirius
backstage.

So, now that we have estblished that this is not an exageration.......I
must ask you....

Why would someone find the need not only to post under multiple
aliases, but to even answer their own posts with other aliases.

Perhaps you can come up with a good reason.....but I highly doubt it

[doberman007]

Admiral....

Yet another frontmed alias.....

Fowler, what is your opinion on this????

Programming for women admiral.....

Martha, Lime, Cosmo., and many other things......You need to do a
little homework.

You may also look at the spanish language comparison and the other
languages.

Sirius has a MASSIVE content advantage.....This is why consumers with a
choice choose sirius

[Dave Zass]

> Exactly what I've been saying. Others here are claiming that these retail
> share gains are permanent. I say bull----.

Please don't put words in my mouth. I never said anything about retail
share and we are not agreeing. I was referring to the fact that you always
claim the Stern Effect is over. It ain't. All I said was that the big rush
for those who wanted to sign up exclusively for Howard will taper off. He
will continue to draw in new listeners, however.

>
>> Your continued assertion that the "Stern Effect" is over is laughable, at
>> best. The Stern Effect will be over when he decides to stop
>> broadcasting.
>
> The Stern Effect is essentially over. He is, at this point, preaching to
> the converted, has a much smaller audience -- maybe 1/6 of his previous
> audience, scarcely more than Opie & Anthony have, and just doesn't have
> the
> drawing power he had when he was on free radio.

Says who? You? I think we've established your lack of credibility here.

> When he has an audience as small as O&A, he simply isn't going to be able
> to
> keep getting better guests. Meanwhile, O&A are putting on people like
> Dale
> Earnhardt Jr & Jimme Johnson.

I never heard of those guys. Who are they?

[Admiral Grace Murray Hopper]

>
> Please don't put words in my mouth. I never said anything about retail
> share and we are not agreeing. I was referring to the fact that you
always
> claim the Stern Effect is over. It ain't. All I said was that the big
rush
> for those who wanted to sign up exclusively for Howard will taper off.
He
> will continue to draw in new listeners, however.
>

The Stern Effect is, essentially, over. Yes, there are stragglers. But the
millions upon millions you all thought would follow him just didn't do it.

Sirius would have ended the year at 800K (according to Doberman, they would
have made it to 1,000,000 last year without him) without Stern last year.
You have to think they would have added more than a million in '05 without
Stern. So, at best, Stern brought 1.5M, and probably more like a million.

If the millions were going to show up, there should have been a 4,000,000
subscriber announcement by now. There hasn't been.

It is over.

> Says who? You? I think we've established your lack of credibility here.

Yes, says me. My credibility is not in question by thinking people. By
people who think with their Stern-encrusted -----s, perhaps.

> > Dale
> > Earnhardt Jr & Jimme Johnson.
>
> I never heard of those guys. Who are they?

LOL. It figures.