Re: Did Howie Lie About Fridays

[=?iso-8859-1?q?The_Cunning_Linguist_=3A=DE-?=]

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:42:42 +0000, Robin's Gunt wrote:

> "Jack Wills" <wills.jack@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:1142345893.821383.209430@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
>
>>
>> Paulie Walnuts wrote:
>>> Thought I heard him rebut Letterman that since he's been on Sirius,
> he's
>>> only taken TWO Fridays off. Did I hear right and could that possibly
> be
>>> true?
>>
>> I can't confirm it either way, but that sounds about right. I only
>> listen to the radio probably 50% of the time on friday, but there has
>> only been one time that it wasn't live in my experience. Every time
>> (except the one time) I turn it on and think "Wait, I thought he wasn't
>> live on fridays!"
>>
>>
>
> It's been every other Friday since February so I guess that would be 3
> Fridays off so far.. The big question is why does Howie pretend like he
> doesn't get every Friday off as per his contract? Why does he keep
> trying to hide that fact now?
>
> "We take some Friday's off." That's not what he said his contract
> states. There must have been some survey or feedack that was horribly
> negative to the lazy schedule and now he's afraid to take his contracted
> days off.
>
> All Dave had to say was "Your contract calls for a four day week so you
> must be planning to take every Friday off at some point." Howie's beady
> eyes would have been left darting around even faster.

Howard admitted this morning that his contract allows him to take EVERY
Friday off. I love Stern, but I'll never buy Sirius if he doesn't do
Fridays. It's simply not worth it to me. Too frustrating. To have Howard
all the rest of the weekdays, then a ---- show on Fridays? I'm not going
to abuse myself by listening to the ---- Friday shows. ---- Friday's = no
future Sirius purchase for me.

As Sirius stock goes down every day, ya gotta know Mel is on Howard to
consistently work Fridays. How else are they going to build the business?
You don't build a business by being inconsistent or offering poor product
vs. the regularly offered professional product. It doesn't make any sense.
No Friday's = fewer subs = bottom line problems = Sirius stock problems.
And of course, any research they're doing indicates that pretty much no
one will stand for Stern taking off Fridays. It's simply not accepted in
broadcasting. The last time a broadcaster did a 4 day week was Johnny
Carson. No one has done it since. Why not? It doesn't help build your
business.

--
The Cunning Linguist :Þ- Commander, Usenet OperAtions

O&A always win in my end. Hey, they're violently ass-fucking me now!!!

[Dr. Droo]

Letterman does a 4 day week, he just records his Monday and Friday back
to back.

--D

[SapperPest19]

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 07:40:13 -0800, The Real ---- Cheney
<i_suck_howard's_balls@mommy's_basement.com> wrote:

>NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.104.43.94
>X-Complaints-To: abuse@cox.net
>X-Trace: fed1read07 1142350755 68.104.43.94 (Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:39:15 EST)
>NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:39:15 EST
>Organization: Cox Communications
>On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:42:42 +0000, Robin's Gunt wrote:
>
>> "Jack Wills" <wills.jack@gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:1142345893.821383.209430@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>>
>>> Paulie Walnuts wrote:
>>>> Thought I heard him rebut Letterman that since he's been on Sirius,
>> he's
>>>> only taken TWO Fridays off. Did I hear right and could that possibly
>> be
>>>> true?
>>>
>>> I can't confirm it either way, but that sounds about right. I only
>>> listen to the radio probably 50% of the time on friday, but there has
>>> only been one time that it wasn't live in my experience. Every time
>>> (except the one time) I turn it on and think "Wait, I thought he wasn't
>>> live on fridays!"
>>>
>>>
>>
>> It's been every other Friday since February so I guess that would be 3
>> Fridays off so far.. The big question is why does Howie pretend like he
>> doesn't get every Friday off as per his contract? Why does he keep
>> trying to hide that fact now?
>>
>> "We take some Friday's off." That's not what he said his contract
>> states. There must have been some survey or feedack that was horribly
>> negative to the lazy schedule and now he's afraid to take his contracted
>> days off.
>>
>> All Dave had to say was "Your contract calls for a four day week so you
>> must be planning to take every Friday off at some point." Howie's beady
>> eyes would have been left darting around even faster.
>
>Howard admitted this morning that his contract allows him to take EVERY
>Friday off. I love Stern, but I'll never buy Sirius if he doesn't do
>Fridays. It's simply not worth it to me. Too frustrating. To have Howard
>all the rest of the weekdays, then a ---- show on Fridays? I'm not going
>to abuse myself by listening to the ---- Friday shows. ---- Friday's = no
>future Sirius purchase for me.
>
>As Sirius stock goes down every day, ya gotta know Mel is on Howard to
>consistently work Fridays. How else are they going to build the business?
>You don't build a business by being inconsistent or offering poor product
>vs. the regularly offered professional product. It doesn't make any sense.
>No Friday's = fewer subs = bottom line problems = Sirius stock problems.
>And of course, any research they're doing indicates that pretty much no
>one will stand for Stern taking off Fridays. It's simply not accepted in
>broadcasting. The last time a broadcaster did a 4 day week was Johnny
>Carson. No one has done it since. Why not? It doesn't help build your
>business.
>
>--
>The Real ---- Cheney
>
>O&A always win in my end. Hey, they're violently ass-fucking me now!!!

I agree, ----.

> >As Sirius stock goes down every day, ya gotta know Mel is on Howard to
> >consistently work Fridays. How else are they going to build the business?
> >You don't build a business by being inconsistent or offering poor product
> >vs. the regularly offered professional product. It doesn't make any
sense.
> >No Friday's = fewer subs = bottom line problems = Sirius stock problems.
> >And of course, any research they're doing indicates that pretty much no
> >one will stand for Stern taking off Fridays. It's simply not accepted in
> >broadcasting. The last time a broadcaster did a 4 day week was Johnny
> >Carson. No one has done it since. Why not? It doesn't help build your
> >business.
> >
> >--
> >The Real ---- Cheney
> >
> >O&A always win in my end. Hey, they're violently ass-fucking me now!!!
>
> I agree, ----.

Wow. Not only is ---- giving a rational and reasonable assesment of Stern
that I actually AGREE WITH, but Sapperpest is too?

BIZZARO ----!! BIZZARO SAPPERPEST!!

[Boom]

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:18:19 -0600, <Dereck_Barker@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:

>
>> >As Sirius stock goes down every day, ya gotta know Mel is on Howard to
>> >consistently work Fridays. How else are they going to build the business?
>> >You don't build a business by being inconsistent or offering poor product
>> >vs. the regularly offered professional product. It doesn't make any
>sense.
>> >No Friday's = fewer subs = bottom line problems = Sirius stock problems.
>> >And of course, any research they're doing indicates that pretty much no
>> >one will stand for Stern taking off Fridays. It's simply not accepted in
>> >broadcasting. The last time a broadcaster did a 4 day week was Johnny
>> >Carson. No one has done it since. Why not? It doesn't help build your
>> >business.
>> >
>> >--
>> >The Real ---- Cheney
>> >
>> >O&A always win in my end. Hey, they're violently ass-fucking me now!!!
>>
>> I agree, ----.
>
>Wow. Not only is ---- giving a rational and reasonable assesment of Stern
>that I actually AGREE WITH, but Sapperpest is too?
>
>BIZZARO ----!! BIZZARO SAPPERPEST!!

While I agree with the supposition that Howard should work a 5 day
work week, it's certainly not a deciding point for me. Between the
less commercials and the length of each show, I'm still getting more
content than I did on testicle radio. So if Howard wants to take some
Fridays off, that's cool with me. I'm sure Mel has been a major
reason why Howard has been working more Fridays, and I'm sure he
wouldn't have agreed if he had negotiated the deal. But he didn't.

This is just my opinion, but if Howard takes a Friday off sometimes,
big deal.

[SapperPest19]

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 21:25:36 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:18:19 -0600, <Dereck_Barker@sbcglobal.net>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>> >As Sirius stock goes down every day, ya gotta know Mel is on Howard to
>>> >consistently work Fridays. How else are they going to build the business?
>>> >You don't build a business by being inconsistent or offering poor product
>>> >vs. the regularly offered professional product. It doesn't make any
>>sense.
>>> >No Friday's = fewer subs = bottom line problems = Sirius stock problems.
>>> >And of course, any research they're doing indicates that pretty much no
>>> >one will stand for Stern taking off Fridays. It's simply not accepted in
>>> >broadcasting. The last time a broadcaster did a 4 day week was Johnny
>>> >Carson. No one has done it since. Why not? It doesn't help build your
>>> >business.
>>> >
>>> >--
>>> >The Real ---- Cheney
>>> >
>>> >O&A always win in my end. Hey, they're violently ass-fucking me now!!!
>>>
>>> I agree, ----.
>>
>>Wow. Not only is ---- giving a rational and reasonable assesment of Stern
>>that I actually AGREE WITH, but Sapperpest is too?
>>
>>BIZZARO ----!! BIZZARO SAPPERPEST!!
>
>While I agree with the supposition that Howard should work a 5 day
>work week, it's certainly not a deciding point for me. Between the
>less commercials and the length of each show, I'm still getting more
>content than I did on testicle radio. So if Howard wants to take some
>Fridays off, that's cool with me. I'm sure Mel has been a major
>reason why Howard has been working more Fridays, and I'm sure he
>wouldn't have agreed if he had negotiated the deal. But he didn't.
>
>This is just my opinion, but if Howard takes a Friday off sometimes,
>big deal.

The way I understand it, Fridays off were part of the deal between
Sirius and Stern. I also think that Stern did not bring as many people
as Mel thought he would have. Therefore, Mel has been begging Stern to
do Fridays until the numbers pick up more. That's just my opinion, but
it does not seem too unreasonable.

[Boom]

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:33:03 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 21:25:36 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:18:19 -0600, <Dereck_Barker@sbcglobal.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>> >As Sirius stock goes down every day, ya gotta know Mel is on Howard to
>>>> >consistently work Fridays. How else are they going to build the business?
>>>> >You don't build a business by being inconsistent or offering poor product
>>>> >vs. the regularly offered professional product. It doesn't make any
>>>sense.
>>>> >No Friday's = fewer subs = bottom line problems = Sirius stock problems.
>>>> >And of course, any research they're doing indicates that pretty much no
>>>> >one will stand for Stern taking off Fridays. It's simply not accepted in
>>>> >broadcasting. The last time a broadcaster did a 4 day week was Johnny
>>>> >Carson. No one has done it since. Why not? It doesn't help build your
>>>> >business.
>>>> >
>>>> >--
>>>> >The Real ---- Cheney
>>>> >
>>>> >O&A always win in my end. Hey, they're violently ass-fucking me now!!!
>>>>
>>>> I agree, ----.
>>>
>>>Wow. Not only is ---- giving a rational and reasonable assesment of Stern
>>>that I actually AGREE WITH, but Sapperpest is too?
>>>
>>>BIZZARO ----!! BIZZARO SAPPERPEST!!
>>
>>While I agree with the supposition that Howard should work a 5 day
>>work week, it's certainly not a deciding point for me. Between the
>>less commercials and the length of each show, I'm still getting more
>>content than I did on testicle radio. So if Howard wants to take some
>>Fridays off, that's cool with me. I'm sure Mel has been a major
>>reason why Howard has been working more Fridays, and I'm sure he
>>wouldn't have agreed if he had negotiated the deal. But he didn't.
>>
>>This is just my opinion, but if Howard takes a Friday off sometimes,
>>big deal.
>
>The way I understand it, Fridays off were part of the deal between
>Sirius and Stern. I also think that Stern did not bring as many people
>as Mel thought he would have. Therefore, Mel has been begging Stern to
>do Fridays until the numbers pick up more. That's just my opinion, but
>it does not seem too unreasonable.

Really? Because I read a quote from Mel that if Howard was
negotiating now, he'd get much more than $100 million a year.

[Michael]

Boom wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:18:19 -0600, <Dereck_Barker@sbcglobal.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>>>>As Sirius stock goes down every day, ya gotta know Mel is on Howard to
>>>>consistently work Fridays. How else are they going to build the business?
>>>>You don't build a business by being inconsistent or offering poor product
>>>>vs. the regularly offered professional product. It doesn't make any
>>
>>sense.
>>
>>>>No Friday's = fewer subs = bottom line problems = Sirius stock problems.
>>>>And of course, any research they're doing indicates that pretty much no
>>>>one will stand for Stern taking off Fridays. It's simply not accepted in
>>>>broadcasting. The last time a broadcaster did a 4 day week was Johnny
>>>>Carson. No one has done it since. Why not? It doesn't help build your
>>>>business.
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>The Real ---- Cheney
>>>>
>>>>O&A always win in my end. Hey, they're violently ass-fucking me now!!!
>>>
>>>I agree, ----.
>>
>>Wow. Not only is ---- giving a rational and reasonable assesment of Stern
>>that I actually AGREE WITH, but Sapperpest is too?
>>
>>BIZZARO ----!! BIZZARO SAPPERPEST!!
>
>
> While I agree with the supposition that Howard should work a 5 day
> work week, it's certainly not a deciding point for me. Between the
> less commercials and the length of each show, I'm still getting more
> content than I did on testicle radio. So if Howard wants to take some
> Fridays off, that's cool with me. I'm sure Mel has been a major
> reason why Howard has been working more Fridays, and I'm sure he
> wouldn't have agreed if he had negotiated the deal. But he didn't.
>
> This is just my opinion, but if Howard takes a Friday off sometimes,
> big deal.

His contract says that he gets all Fridays off.

Michael

[Michael]

Boom wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:33:03 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
>
>
>>On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 21:25:36 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:18:19 -0600, <Dereck_Barker@sbcglobal.net>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>As Sirius stock goes down every day, ya gotta know Mel is on Howard to
>>>>>>consistently work Fridays. How else are they going to build the business?
>>>>>>You don't build a business by being inconsistent or offering poor product
>>>>>>vs. the regularly offered professional product. It doesn't make any
>>>>
>>>>sense.
>>>>
>>>>>>No Friday's = fewer subs = bottom line problems = Sirius stock problems.
>>>>>>And of course, any research they're doing indicates that pretty much no
>>>>>>one will stand for Stern taking off Fridays. It's simply not accepted in
>>>>>>broadcasting. The last time a broadcaster did a 4 day week was Johnny
>>>>>>Carson. No one has done it since. Why not? It doesn't help build your
>>>>>>business.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>--
>>>>>>The Real ---- Cheney
>>>>>>
>>>>>>O&A always win in my end. Hey, they're violently ass-fucking me now!!!
>>>>>
>>>>>I agree, ----.
>>>>
>>>>Wow. Not only is ---- giving a rational and reasonable assesment of Stern
>>>>that I actually AGREE WITH, but Sapperpest is too?
>>>>
>>>>BIZZARO ----!! BIZZARO SAPPERPEST!!
>>>
>>>While I agree with the supposition that Howard should work a 5 day
>>>work week, it's certainly not a deciding point for me. Between the
>>>less commercials and the length of each show, I'm still getting more
>>>content than I did on testicle radio. So if Howard wants to take some
>>>Fridays off, that's cool with me. I'm sure Mel has been a major
>>>reason why Howard has been working more Fridays, and I'm sure he
>>>wouldn't have agreed if he had negotiated the deal. But he didn't.
>>>
>>>This is just my opinion, but if Howard takes a Friday off sometimes,
>>>big deal.
>>
>>The way I understand it, Fridays off were part of the deal between
>>Sirius and Stern. I also think that Stern did not bring as many people
>>as Mel thought he would have. Therefore, Mel has been begging Stern to
>>do Fridays until the numbers pick up more. That's just my opinion, but
>>it does not seem too unreasonable.
>
>
> Really? Because I read a quote from Mel that if Howard was
> negotiating now, he'd get much more than $100 million a year.

And that quote was from where?

Michael

[Boom]

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:13:53 -0800, Michael <jandm16@charter.net>
wrote:


>> This is just my opinion, but if Howard takes a Friday off sometimes,
>> big deal.
>
>His contract says that he gets all Fridays off.

Well good for him. Working for free is a very nice gesture to his
fans.

[Boom]

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:15:43 -0800, Michael <jandm16@charter.net>
wrote:

>> Really? Because I read a quote from Mel that if Howard was
>> negotiating now, he'd get much more than $100 million a year.
>
>And that quote was from where?

How the hell should I know? I've read so many articles about how
successful the Stern thing's been that it's hard to keep up with them.

[Michael]

Boom wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:13:53 -0800, Michael <jandm16@charter.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>>>This is just my opinion, but if Howard takes a Friday off sometimes,
>>>big deal.
>>
>>His contract says that he gets all Fridays off.
>
>
> Well good for him. Working for free is a very nice gesture to his
> fans.

He's already berated his fans over getting some flak over not working
Fridays and admitted that he's only working the Fridays he does work due
to "pressure" he's receiving from person(s) unknown, not out of the
goodness of his heart or as some "nice gesture to his fans".

Michael

[Michael]

Boom wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:15:43 -0800, Michael <jandm16@charter.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>>>Really? Because I read a quote from Mel that if Howard was
>>>negotiating now, he'd get much more than $100 million a year.
>>
>>And that quote was from where?
>
>
> How the hell should I know? I've read so many articles about how
> successful the Stern thing's been that it's hard to keep up with them.

Ah. Okay.

Michael

[Ricky Ticket]

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:40:56 -0500, Boom wrote
(in message <02ee12p0a2evrh0kt7v3lberg894nbvsfa@4ax.com>):

> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:33:03 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 21:25:36 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:18:19 -0600, <Dereck_Barker@sbcglobal.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> As Sirius stock goes down every day, ya gotta know Mel is on Howard to
>>>>>> consistently work Fridays. How else are they going to build the
>>>>>> business?
>>>>>> You don't build a business by being inconsistent or offering poor
>>>>>> product
>>>>>> vs. the regularly offered professional product. It doesn't make any
>>>> sense.
>>>>>> No Friday's = fewer subs = bottom line problems = Sirius stock
>>>>>> problems.
>>>>>> And of course, any research they're doing indicates that pretty much no
>>>>>> one will stand for Stern taking off Fridays. It's simply not accepted
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> broadcasting. The last time a broadcaster did a 4 day week was Johnny
>>>>>> Carson. No one has done it since. Why not? It doesn't help build your
>>>>>> business.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> The Real ---- Cheney
>>>>>>
>>>>>> O&A always win in my end. Hey, they're violently ass-fucking me now!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree, ----.
>>>>
>>>> Wow. Not only is ---- giving a rational and reasonable assesment of Stern
>>>> that I actually AGREE WITH, but Sapperpest is too?
>>>>
>>>> BIZZARO ----!! BIZZARO SAPPERPEST!!
>>>
>>> While I agree with the supposition that Howard should work a 5 day
>>> work week, it's certainly not a deciding point for me. Between the
>>> less commercials and the length of each show, I'm still getting more
>>> content than I did on testicle radio. So if Howard wants to take some
>>> Fridays off, that's cool with me. I'm sure Mel has been a major
>>> reason why Howard has been working more Fridays, and I'm sure he
>>> wouldn't have agreed if he had negotiated the deal. But he didn't.
>>>
>>> This is just my opinion, but if Howard takes a Friday off sometimes,
>>> big deal.
>>
>> The way I understand it, Fridays off were part of the deal between
>> Sirius and Stern. I also think that Stern did not bring as many people
>> as Mel thought he would have. Therefore, Mel has been begging Stern to
>> do Fridays until the numbers pick up more. That's just my opinion, but
>> it does not seem too unreasonable.
>
> Really? Because I read a quote from Mel that if Howard was
> negotiating now, he'd get much more than $100 million a year.

Mel is trying to save his job (see sig). :D

--
"The Stern Effect"

Sirius stock prices since Stern started work...

Jan-09-06 6.57 Stern opens his mic
Jan-10-06 6.50
Jan-11-06 6.12
Jan-12-06 6.20
Jan-13-06 6.28
Jan-17-06 6.20
Jan-18-06 6.29
Jan-19-06 6.35
Jan-20-06 6.30
Jan-23-06 6.11
Jan-24-06 5.90
Jan-25-06 5.92
Jan-26-06 5.82
Jan-27-06 5.87
Jan-30-06 5.86
Jan-31-06 5.67
Feb-01-06 5.71
Feb-02-06 5.54
Feb-03-06 5.33
Feb-06-06 5.49
Feb-07-06 5.76
Feb-08-06 5.98
Feb-09-06 5.80
Feb-10-06 5.74
Feb-13-06 5.61
Feb-14-06 5.64
Feb-15-06 5.82
Feb-16-06 5.65
Feb-17-06 5.26
Feb-21-06 5.18
Feb-22-06 5.29
Feb-23-06 5.22
Feb-24-06 5.18
Feb-27-06 5.23
Feb-28-06 5.11
Mar-01-06 5.04
Mar-02-06 5.08
Mar-03-06 5.01
Mar-06-06 4.91
Mar-07-06 4.92
Mar-08-06 4.77
Mar-09-06 4.89
Mar-10-06 4.78
Mar-13-06 4.60
Mar-14-06 4.45 -32.27% Since Stern opened his Mic

[Ricky Ticket]

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 19:41:03 -0500, Boom wrote
(in message <mjoe121aq6vkq76s34t45qkh1hsbeglmpi@4ax.com>):

> From: Boom <mmm@nnn.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.howard-stern, alt.fan.howard-stern,
> alt.fan.opie-and-anthony, alt.radio.satellite
>
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:15:43 -0800, Michael <jandm16@charter.net>
> wrote:
>
>>> Really? Because I read a quote from Mel that if Howard was
>>> negotiating now, he'd get much more than $100 million a year.
>>
>> And that quote was from where?
>
> How the hell should I know? I've read so many articles about how
> successful the Stern thing's been that it's hard to keep up with them.

Maybe it was an internal memo, boom is an insider now. :D

::snicker::

--
"The Stern Effect"

Sirius stock prices since Stern started work...

Jan-09-06 6.57 Stern opens his mic
Jan-10-06 6.50
Jan-11-06 6.12
Jan-12-06 6.20
Jan-13-06 6.28
Jan-17-06 6.20
Jan-18-06 6.29
Jan-19-06 6.35
Jan-20-06 6.30
Jan-23-06 6.11
Jan-24-06 5.90
Jan-25-06 5.92
Jan-26-06 5.82
Jan-27-06 5.87
Jan-30-06 5.86
Jan-31-06 5.67
Feb-01-06 5.71
Feb-02-06 5.54
Feb-03-06 5.33
Feb-06-06 5.49
Feb-07-06 5.76
Feb-08-06 5.98
Feb-09-06 5.80
Feb-10-06 5.74
Feb-13-06 5.61
Feb-14-06 5.64
Feb-15-06 5.82
Feb-16-06 5.65
Feb-17-06 5.26
Feb-21-06 5.18
Feb-22-06 5.29
Feb-23-06 5.22
Feb-24-06 5.18
Feb-27-06 5.23
Feb-28-06 5.11
Mar-01-06 5.04
Mar-02-06 5.08
Mar-03-06 5.01
Mar-06-06 4.91
Mar-07-06 4.92
Mar-08-06 4.77
Mar-09-06 4.89
Mar-10-06 4.78
Mar-13-06 4.60
Mar-14-06 4.45 -32.27% Since Stern opened his Mic

[Boom]

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 03:02:56 GMT, Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:40:56 -0500, Boom wrote
>(in message <02ee12p0a2evrh0kt7v3lberg894nbvsfa@4ax.com>):
>
>> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:33:03 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 21:25:36 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:18:19 -0600, <Dereck_Barker@sbcglobal.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> As Sirius stock goes down every day, ya gotta know Mel is on Howard to
>>>>>>> consistently work Fridays. How else are they going to build the
>>>>>>> business?
>>>>>>> You don't build a business by being inconsistent or offering poor
>>>>>>> product
>>>>>>> vs. the regularly offered professional product. It doesn't make any
>>>>> sense.
>>>>>>> No Friday's = fewer subs = bottom line problems = Sirius stock
>>>>>>> problems.
>>>>>>> And of course, any research they're doing indicates that pretty much no
>>>>>>> one will stand for Stern taking off Fridays. It's simply not accepted
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> broadcasting. The last time a broadcaster did a 4 day week was Johnny
>>>>>>> Carson. No one has done it since. Why not? It doesn't help build your
>>>>>>> business.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> The Real ---- Cheney
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> O&A always win in my end. Hey, they're violently ass-fucking me now!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree, ----.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wow. Not only is ---- giving a rational and reasonable assesment of Stern
>>>>> that I actually AGREE WITH, but Sapperpest is too?
>>>>>
>>>>> BIZZARO ----!! BIZZARO SAPPERPEST!!
>>>>
>>>> While I agree with the supposition that Howard should work a 5 day
>>>> work week, it's certainly not a deciding point for me. Between the
>>>> less commercials and the length of each show, I'm still getting more
>>>> content than I did on testicle radio. So if Howard wants to take some
>>>> Fridays off, that's cool with me. I'm sure Mel has been a major
>>>> reason why Howard has been working more Fridays, and I'm sure he
>>>> wouldn't have agreed if he had negotiated the deal. But he didn't.
>>>>
>>>> This is just my opinion, but if Howard takes a Friday off sometimes,
>>>> big deal.
>>>
>>> The way I understand it, Fridays off were part of the deal between
>>> Sirius and Stern. I also think that Stern did not bring as many people
>>> as Mel thought he would have. Therefore, Mel has been begging Stern to
>>> do Fridays until the numbers pick up more. That's just my opinion, but
>>> it does not seem too unreasonable.
>>
>> Really? Because I read a quote from Mel that if Howard was
>> negotiating now, he'd get much more than $100 million a year.
>
>Mel is trying to save his job (see sig). :D

Look how I manipulated you, little Ricky! I say "Dance for me,
Ricky," and you dance! You are my little puppet!

[Boom]

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 03:04:21 GMT, Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 19:41:03 -0500, Boom wrote
>(in message <mjoe121aq6vkq76s34t45qkh1hsbeglmpi@4ax.com>):
>
>> From: Boom <mmm@nnn.com>
>> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.howard-stern, alt.fan.howard-stern,
>> alt.fan.opie-and-anthony, alt.radio.satellite
>>
>> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:15:43 -0800, Michael <jandm16@charter.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> Really? Because I read a quote from Mel that if Howard was
>>>> negotiating now, he'd get much more than $100 million a year.
>>>
>>> And that quote was from where?
>>
>> How the hell should I know? I've read so many articles about how
>> successful the Stern thing's been that it's hard to keep up with them.
>
>Maybe it was an internal memo, boom is an insider now. :D

Dance dance dance!

[The Central Scrotinizer]

In article <0001HW.C03CEE690003986420BB99B0@news.east.earthlink.net>,
Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:
>
> ::snicker::
>
> --
> "The Stern Effect"
>
> Sirius stock prices since Stern started work...
>
> Jan-09-06 6.57 Stern opens his mic
> Jan-10-06 6.50
> Jan-11-06 6.12
> Mar-10-06 4.78
> Mar-13-06 4.60
> Mar-14-06 4.45 -32.27% Since Stern opened his Mic



Your stock analysis has nothing to do with Stern opening his mic, but,
we might as well compare -------s to -------s...

"The O&A Effect"

XM stock prices on O&A's start date to present...

Oct-05-04 $29.48
Mar-14-06 $20.45 -31.63% Since O&A opened their mic

--
The Central Scrotinizer

[Cunning Linguist's Gay Lover]

The Cunning Linguist :Þ- <i_suck_howard's_balls@mommy's_basement.com>
wrote in news:pan.2006.03.14.15.40.10.814250@mommy's_basement.com:

> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:42:42 +0000, Robin's Gunt wrote:
>
>> "Jack Wills" <wills.jack@gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:1142345893.821383.209430@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>>
>>> Paulie Walnuts wrote:
>>>> Thought I heard him rebut Letterman that since he's been on Sirius,
>> he's
>>>> only taken TWO Fridays off. Did I hear right and could that
>>>> possibly
>> be
>>>> true?
>>>
>>> I can't confirm it either way, but that sounds about right. I only
>>> listen to the radio probably 50% of the time on friday, but there
>>> has only been one time that it wasn't live in my experience. Every
>>> time (except the one time) I turn it on and think "Wait, I thought
>>> he wasn't live on fridays!"
>>>
>>>
>>
>> It's been every other Friday since February so I guess that would be
>> 3 Fridays off so far.. The big question is why does Howie pretend
>> like he doesn't get every Friday off as per his contract? Why does
>> he keep trying to hide that fact now?
>>
>> "We take some Friday's off." That's not what he said his contract
>> states. There must have been some survey or feedack that was
>> horribly negative to the lazy schedule and now he's afraid to take
>> his contracted days off.
>>
>> All Dave had to say was "Your contract calls for a four day week so
>> you must be planning to take every Friday off at some point."
>> Howie's beady eyes would have been left darting around even faster.
>
> Howard admitted this morning that his contract allows him to take
> EVERY Friday off. I love Stern, but I'll never buy Sirius if he
> doesn't do Fridays. It's simply not worth it to me. Too frustrating.
> To have Howard all the rest of the weekdays, then a ---- show on
> Fridays? I'm not going to abuse myself by listening to the ---- Friday
> shows. ---- Friday's = no future Sirius purchase for me.
>
> As Sirius stock goes down every day, ya gotta know Mel is on Howard to
> consistently work Fridays. How else are they going to build the
> business? You don't build a business by being inconsistent or offering
> poor product vs. the regularly offered professional product. It
> doesn't make any sense. No Friday's = fewer subs = bottom line
> problems = Sirius stock problems. And of course, any research they're
> doing indicates that pretty much no one will stand for Stern taking
> off Fridays. It's simply not accepted in broadcasting. The last time a
> broadcaster did a 4 day week was Johnny Carson. No one has done it
> since. Why not? It doesn't help build your business.
>

Your reaching for bull----, I guess you rather listen to a 4-hour of
oral and anul....Stern has been in most Fridays only missed 2, the shows
each day total up to 5+ hours per day.

[Michael]

The Central Scrotinizer wrote:

> In article <0001HW.C03CEE690003986420BB99B0@news.east.earthlink.net>,
> Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:
>
>>::snicker::
>>
>>--
>>"The Stern Effect"
>>
>>Sirius stock prices since Stern started work...
>>
>>Jan-09-06 6.57 Stern opens his mic
>>Jan-10-06 6.50
>>Jan-11-06 6.12
>>Mar-10-06 4.78
>>Mar-13-06 4.60
>>Mar-14-06 4.45 -32.27% Since Stern opened his Mic
>
>
>
>
> Your stock analysis has nothing to do with Stern opening his mic, but,
> we might as well compare -------s to -------s...
>
> "The O&A Effect"
>
> XM stock prices on O&A's start date to present...
>
> Oct-05-04 $29.48
> Mar-14-06 $20.45 -31.63% Since O&A opened their mic

So what your saying is that, percentage-wise, Stern did more damage much
faster to Sirius than O&A did to XM.

Michael

[Boom]

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 19:32:35 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
<mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:

>In article <0001HW.C03CEE690003986420BB99B0@news.east.earthlink.net>,
> Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:
>>
>> ::snicker::
>>
>> --
>> "The Stern Effect"
>>
>> Sirius stock prices since Stern started work...
>>
>> Jan-09-06 6.57 Stern opens his mic
>> Jan-10-06 6.50
>> Jan-11-06 6.12
>> Mar-10-06 4.78
>> Mar-13-06 4.60
>> Mar-14-06 4.45 -32.27% Since Stern opened his Mic
>
>
>
>Your stock analysis has nothing to do with Stern opening his mic, but,
>we might as well compare -------s to -------s...
>
>"The O&A Effect"
>
>XM stock prices on O&A's start date to present...
>
>Oct-05-04 $29.48
>Mar-14-06 $20.45 -31.63% Since O&A opened their mic

Here's where Ricky says only the first two months count because
Howard's only been on two months. The nice thing about Ricky is how
he thinks he's the master manipulator, yet he always is happy to dance
for us, and all we have to do is ask.

[The Central Scrotinizer]

In article <PAMRf.516$Fn3.262@fe04.lga>, Michael <jandm16@charter.net>
wrote:

> The Central Scrotinizer wrote:
>
> > In article <0001HW.C03CEE690003986420BB99B0@news.east.earthlink.net>,
> > Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:
> >
> >>::snicker::
> >>
> >>--
> >>"The Stern Effect"
> >>
> >>Sirius stock prices since Stern started work...
> >>
> >>Jan-09-06 6.57 Stern opens his mic
> >>Jan-10-06 6.50
> >>Jan-11-06 6.12
> >>Mar-10-06 4.78
> >>Mar-13-06 4.60
> >>Mar-14-06 4.45 -32.27% Since Stern opened his Mic
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your stock analysis has nothing to do with Stern opening his mic, but,
> > we might as well compare -------s to -------s...
> >
> > "The O&A Effect"
> >
> > XM stock prices on O&A's start date to present...
> >
> > Oct-05-04 $29.48
> > Mar-14-06 $20.45 -31.63% Since O&A opened their mic
>
> So what your saying is that, percentage-wise, Stern did more damage much
> faster to Sirius than O&A did to XM.
>
> Michael

Not at all. It's more of an industry trend. Analysts have been calling
SIRI's trend down since mid-December if not sooner, so there are no
surprises there. Advice back then was put on a cup and wait out the
storm, or sell. It will begin to go back up in the next two to three
months, it may be a little sluggish because of the lawsuit, but it
should begin a upward trend by May/June.

XM's stock is a little shakier. The bitch is their stock hasn't been
this low in almost 3 years... So unless you got in back in the summer of
2003, you're losing money big-time. I'd like to say it's tanking because
of O&A, but that's just not true. They really don't have that much pull
anywhere outside of their studio. It's mainly been an over-valued stock
since Sirius became a relevant competitor

SIRI stock is still worth more now than when Stern announced his signing
with Sirius, which is when the "Buy SIRI" rush started. So those folks
that bought SIRI solely on the weight of Stern's celebrity, are still on
the plus side. XM on the other hand, hasn't been this low in almost 3
years...

Rock over London, rock on Chicago.

--
The Central Scrotinizer

[Dr. Droo]

Michael wrote:
> And that quote was from where?
>
> Michael

I do recall hearing Mel say that Stern would be worth more than 100
million now, it was when he was with the head of the NBA announcing
their new longer term agreement if memory serves.

--D

[SapperPest19]

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 23:34:18 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
<mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:

>Rock over London, rock on Chicago.

Wheaties, breakfast of champions

[The Central Scrotinizer]

In article <ml9g12585kvso7l08ijv9en4pnrtua171i@4ax.com>,
SapperPest19 <bob@work.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 23:34:18 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
>
> >Rock over London, rock on Chicago.
>
> Wheaties, breakfast of champions

Nicely done!

--
The Central Scrotinizer

[Ricky Ticket]

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 22:32:35 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
(in message <mudshark-268397.19323514032006@news.giganews.com>):

> Your stock analysis

Yeah, listing reality is "analysis". :D

--
"The Stern Effect"

Sirius stock prices since Stern started work...

Jan-09-06 6.57 Stern opens his mic
Jan-10-06 6.50
Jan-11-06 6.12
Jan-12-06 6.20
Jan-13-06 6.28
Jan-17-06 6.20
Jan-18-06 6.29
Jan-19-06 6.35
Jan-20-06 6.30
Jan-23-06 6.11
Jan-24-06 5.90
Jan-25-06 5.92
Jan-26-06 5.82
Jan-27-06 5.87
Jan-30-06 5.86
Jan-31-06 5.67
Feb-01-06 5.71
Feb-02-06 5.54
Feb-03-06 5.33
Feb-06-06 5.49
Feb-07-06 5.76
Feb-08-06 5.98
Feb-09-06 5.80
Feb-10-06 5.74
Feb-13-06 5.61
Feb-14-06 5.64
Feb-15-06 5.82
Feb-16-06 5.65
Feb-17-06 5.26
Feb-21-06 5.18
Feb-22-06 5.29
Feb-23-06 5.22
Feb-24-06 5.18
Feb-27-06 5.23
Feb-28-06 5.11
Mar-01-06 5.04
Mar-02-06 5.08
Mar-03-06 5.01
Mar-06-06 4.91
Mar-07-06 4.92
Mar-08-06 4.77
Mar-09-06 4.89
Mar-10-06 4.78
Mar-13-06 4.60
Mar-14-06 4.45 -32.27% Since Stern opened his Mic

[The Central Scrotinizer]

In article <0001HW.C03ECE08000469DB1CBA3F40@news.east.earthlink.net>,
Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 22:32:35 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
> (in message <mudshark-268397.19323514032006@news.giganews.com>):
>
> > Your stock analysis
>
> Yeah, listing reality is "analysis". :D
>
> --
> "The Stern Effect"
>
> Sirius stock prices since Stern started work...
>
> Jan-09-06 6.57 Stern opens his mic
> Jan-10-06 6.50
> Jan-11-06 6.12
> Jan-12-06 6.20
> Jan-13-06 6.28
> Jan-17-06 6.20
> Jan-18-06 6.29
> Jan-19-06 6.35
> Jan-20-06 6.30
> Jan-23-06 6.11
> Jan-24-06 5.90
> Jan-25-06 5.92
> Jan-26-06 5.82
> Jan-27-06 5.87
> Jan-30-06 5.86
> Jan-31-06 5.67
> Feb-01-06 5.71
> Feb-02-06 5.54
> Feb-03-06 5.33
> Feb-06-06 5.49
> Feb-07-06 5.76
> Feb-08-06 5.98
> Feb-09-06 5.80
> Feb-10-06 5.74
> Feb-13-06 5.61
> Feb-14-06 5.64
> Feb-15-06 5.82
> Feb-16-06 5.65
> Feb-17-06 5.26
> Feb-21-06 5.18
> Feb-22-06 5.29
> Feb-23-06 5.22
> Feb-24-06 5.18
> Feb-27-06 5.23
> Feb-28-06 5.11
> Mar-01-06 5.04
> Mar-02-06 5.08
> Mar-03-06 5.01
> Mar-06-06 4.91
> Mar-07-06 4.92
> Mar-08-06 4.77
> Mar-09-06 4.89
> Mar-10-06 4.78
> Mar-13-06 4.60
> Mar-14-06 4.45 -32.27% Since Stern opened his Mic



Wow. Profound. You must be tired from driving around and whipping your
man boobs out all day yesterday.

--
The Central Scrotinizer

[lab~rat >:-)]

On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 06:17:03 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
<mudshark@edgewater.com> puked:

>In article <0001HW.C03ECE08000469DB1CBA3F40@news.east.earthlink.net>,
> Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 22:32:35 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
>> (in message <mudshark-268397.19323514032006@news.giganews.com>):
>>
>> > Your stock analysis
>>
>> Yeah, listing reality is "analysis". :D
>>
>> --
>> "The Stern Effect"
>>
>> Sirius stock prices since Stern started work...
>>
>> Jan-09-06 6.57 Stern opens his mic
>> Jan-10-06 6.50
>> Jan-11-06 6.12
>> Jan-12-06 6.20
>> Jan-13-06 6.28
>> Jan-17-06 6.20
>> Jan-18-06 6.29
>> Jan-19-06 6.35
>> Jan-20-06 6.30
>> Jan-23-06 6.11
>> Jan-24-06 5.90
>> Jan-25-06 5.92
>> Jan-26-06 5.82
>> Jan-27-06 5.87
>> Jan-30-06 5.86
>> Jan-31-06 5.67
>> Feb-01-06 5.71
>> Feb-02-06 5.54
>> Feb-03-06 5.33
>> Feb-06-06 5.49
>> Feb-07-06 5.76
>> Feb-08-06 5.98
>> Feb-09-06 5.80
>> Feb-10-06 5.74
>> Feb-13-06 5.61
>> Feb-14-06 5.64
>> Feb-15-06 5.82
>> Feb-16-06 5.65
>> Feb-17-06 5.26
>> Feb-21-06 5.18
>> Feb-22-06 5.29
>> Feb-23-06 5.22
>> Feb-24-06 5.18
>> Feb-27-06 5.23
>> Feb-28-06 5.11
>> Mar-01-06 5.04
>> Mar-02-06 5.08
>> Mar-03-06 5.01
>> Mar-06-06 4.91
>> Mar-07-06 4.92
>> Mar-08-06 4.77
>> Mar-09-06 4.89
>> Mar-10-06 4.78
>> Mar-13-06 4.60
>> Mar-14-06 4.45 -32.27% Since Stern opened his Mic
>
>
>
>Wow. Profound. You must be tired from driving around and whipping your
>man boobs out all day yesterday.

Don't pick on Ricky. His only redemption in life is his obsessive
compulsion with following Sirius stock and yours truly...
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

[yqf@my-deja.com]

Michael wrote:
> The Central Scrotinizer wrote:
> > Your stock analysis has nothing to do with Stern opening his mic, but,
> > we might as well compare -------s to -------s...
> >
> > "The O&A Effect"
> >
> > XM stock prices on O&A's start date to present...
> >
> > Oct-05-04 $29.48
> > Mar-14-06 $20.45 -31.63% Since O&A opened their mic
>
> So what your saying is that, percentage-wise, Stern did more damage much
> faster to Sirius than O&A did to XM.
>
> Michael

How the fuck did you come to that conclusion? Sirius stock is up
substantially since Stern signed with Sirius, and XM stock is down
substantially over the same time period. (more than +50% for Sirius vs.
more than minus 25% for XM)

[yqf@my-deja.com]

Michael wrote:
> The Central Scrotinizer wrote:
> > Your stock analysis has nothing to do with Stern opening his mic, but,
> > we might as well compare -------s to -------s...
> >
> > "The O&A Effect"
> >
> > XM stock prices on O&A's start date to present...
> >
> > Oct-05-04 $29.48
> > Mar-14-06 $20.45 -31.63% Since O&A opened their mic
>
> So what your saying is that, percentage-wise, Stern did more damage much
> faster to Sirius than O&A did to XM.
>
> Michael

How the fuck did you come to that conclusion? Sirius stock is up
substantially since Stern signed with Sirius, and XM stock is down
substantially over the same time period. (more than +50% for Sirius vs.
more than minus 25% for XM)

[Michael]

yqf@my-deja.com wrote:

> Michael wrote:
>
>>The Central Scrotinizer wrote:
>>
>>>Your stock analysis has nothing to do with Stern opening his mic, but,
>>>we might as well compare -------s to -------s...
>>>
>>>"The O&A Effect"
>>>
>>>XM stock prices on O&A's start date to present...
>>>
>>>Oct-05-04 $29.48
>>>Mar-14-06 $20.45 -31.63% Since O&A opened their mic
>>
>>So what your saying is that, percentage-wise, Stern did more damage much
>>faster to Sirius than O&A did to XM.
>>
>>Michael
>
>
> How the fuck did you come to that conclusion? Sirius stock is up
> substantially since Stern signed with Sirius, and XM stock is down
> substantially over the same time period. (more than +50% for Sirius vs.
> more than minus 25% for XM)

tCS used O&A's start date. It's only fair to compare the two using
Stern's start date as well.

Michael

[The Central Scrotinizer]

In article <38VTf.19$XB4.0@fe02.lga>, Michael <jandm16@charter.net>
wrote:

> yqf@my-deja.com wrote:
>
> > Michael wrote:
> >
> >>The Central Scrotinizer wrote:
> >>
> >>>Your stock analysis has nothing to do with Stern opening his mic, but,
> >>>we might as well compare -------s to -------s...
> >>>
> >>>"The O&A Effect"
> >>>
> >>>XM stock prices on O&A's start date to present...
> >>>
> >>>Oct-05-04 $29.48
> >>>Mar-14-06 $20.45 -31.63% Since O&A opened their mic
> >>
> >>So what your saying is that, percentage-wise, Stern did more damage much
> >>faster to Sirius than O&A did to XM.
> >>
> >>Michael
> >
> >
> > How the fuck did you come to that conclusion? Sirius stock is up
> > substantially since Stern signed with Sirius, and XM stock is down
> > substantially over the same time period. (more than +50% for Sirius vs.
> > more than minus 25% for XM)
>
> tCS used O&A's start date. It's only fair to compare the two using
> Stern's start date as well.
>
> Michael

I have. It's about the same, actually, I think it's a little worse. But
honestly, it doesn't make a difference, I just like to combat some
peoples ideas that the stock prices are related to Stern and O&A.

--
The Central Scrotinizer

[Tim Donohoe]

The Central Scrotinizer wrote:

> In article <38VTf.19$XB4.0@fe02.lga>, Michael <jandm16@charter.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>>yqf@my-deja.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Michael wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>The Central Scrotinizer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Your stock analysis has nothing to do with Stern opening his mic, but,
>>>>>we might as well compare -------s to -------s...
>>>>>
>>>>>"The O&A Effect"
>>>>>
>>>>>XM stock prices on O&A's start date to present...
>>>>>
>>>>>Oct-05-04 $29.48
>>>>>Mar-14-06 $20.45 -31.63% Since O&A opened their mic
>>>>
>>>>So what your saying is that, percentage-wise, Stern did more damage much
>>>>faster to Sirius than O&A did to XM.
>>>>
>>>>Michael
>>>
>>>
>>>How the fuck did you come to that conclusion? Sirius stock is up
>>>substantially since Stern signed with Sirius, and XM stock is down
>>>substantially over the same time period. (more than +50% for Sirius vs.
>>>more than minus 25% for XM)
>>
>>tCS used O&A's start date. It's only fair to compare the two using
>>Stern's start date as well.
>>
>>Michael
>
>
> I have. It's about the same, actually, I think it's a little worse. But
> honestly, it doesn't make a difference, I just like to combat some
> peoples ideas that the stock prices are related to Stern and O&A.
>

Did XM's stock spike when O&A announced they were going there?

[The Central Scrotinizer]

In article <oY_Tf.168$TV1.113@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com>,
Tim Donohoe <tdonohoe@aol.com> wrote:

> Did XM's stock spike when O&A announced they were going there?

Yes, and so did Sirius...

O&A announced their deal with XM on Aug 3rd, 2004 and started work Oct
4, 2004.

Aug 3rd 2004 = XMSR: $25.80
Oct 4th 2004 = XMSR: $29.88 +15.81% increase

SIRI stock during the same time period:
Aug 3rd 2004 = SIRI: $2.42
Oct 4th 2004 = SIRI: $3.24 +33.88% increase

XMSR experienced a 15.81% spike in their stock between the time O&A
announced their deal and their first day on air.

SIRI experienced a 33.88% increase, more than double that of XMSR, in
that same time period.

--
The Central Scrotinizer

[Ricky Ticket]

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:17:56 -0500, Tim Donohoe wrote
(in message <oY_Tf.168$TV1.113@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com>):

> The Central Scrotinizer wrote:
>
>> In article <38VTf.19$XB4.0@fe02.lga>, Michael <jandm16@charter.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> yqf@my-deja.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Michael wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> The Central Scrotinizer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Your stock analysis has nothing to do with Stern opening his mic, but,
>>>>>> we might as well compare -------s to -------s...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "The O&A Effect"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> XM stock prices on O&A's start date to present...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oct-05-04 $29.48
>>>>>> Mar-14-06 $20.45 -31.63% Since O&A opened their mic
>>>>>
>>>>> So what your saying is that, percentage-wise, Stern did more damage much
>>>>> faster to Sirius than O&A did to XM.
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How the fuck did you come to that conclusion? Sirius stock is up
>>>> substantially since Stern signed with Sirius, and XM stock is down
>>>> substantially over the same time period. (more than +50% for Sirius vs.
>>>> more than minus 25% for XM)
>>>
>>> tCS used O&A's start date. It's only fair to compare the two using
>>> Stern's start date as well.
>>>
>>> Michael
>>
>>
>> I have. It's about the same, actually, I think it's a little worse. But
>> honestly, it doesn't make a difference, I just like to combat some
>> peoples ideas that the stock prices are related to Stern and O&A.
>>
>
> Did XM's stock spike when O&A announced they were going there?

Anyone else notice that when "Tim" shows up, double yqf is sure to follow? :D

::snicker::

--
"I'm totally with Boom and though I wouldn't invite him to Sunday dinner at
my church, he ended up proving everything he said and all you guys who didn't
like what he said could do is make up stuff in retaliation."
--django12x@aol.com (AKA Boom)

[Ricky Ticket]

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:10:27 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
(in message <mudshark-B6123D.19102721032006@news.giganews.com>):

> In article <oY_Tf.168$TV1.113@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com>,
> Tim Donohoe <tdonohoe@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> Did XM's stock spike when O&A announced they were going there?
>
> Yes, and so did Sirius...
>
> O&A announced their deal with XM on Aug 3rd, 2004 and started work Oct
> 4, 2004.
>
> Aug 3rd 2004 = XMSR: $25.80
> Oct 4th 2004 = XMSR: $29.88 +15.81% increase
>
> SIRI stock during the same time period:
> Aug 3rd 2004 = SIRI: $2.42
> Oct 4th 2004 = SIRI: $3.24 +33.88% increase
>
> XMSR experienced a 15.81% spike in their stock between the time O&A
> announced their deal and their first day on air.
>
> SIRI experienced a 33.88% increase, more than double that of XMSR, in
> that same time period.
>
>

What happened when they actually started work? :D

--
"I'm totally with Boom and though I wouldn't invite him to Sunday dinner at
my church, he ended up proving everything he said and all you guys who didn't
like what he said could do is make up stuff in retaliation."
--django12x@aol.com (AKA Boom)

[Hoody]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:54:07 GMT, Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:10:27 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
>(in message <mudshark-B6123D.19102721032006@news.giganews.com>):
>
>> In article <oY_Tf.168$TV1.113@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com>,
>> Tim Donohoe <tdonohoe@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Did XM's stock spike when O&A announced they were going there?
>>
>> Yes, and so did Sirius...
>>
>> O&A announced their deal with XM on Aug 3rd, 2004 and started work Oct
>> 4, 2004.
>>
>> Aug 3rd 2004 = XMSR: $25.80
>> Oct 4th 2004 = XMSR: $29.88 +15.81% increase
>>
>> SIRI stock during the same time period:
>> Aug 3rd 2004 = SIRI: $2.42
>> Oct 4th 2004 = SIRI: $3.24 +33.88% increase
>>
>> XMSR experienced a 15.81% spike in their stock between the time O&A
>> announced their deal and their first day on air.
>>
>> SIRI experienced a 33.88% increase, more than double that of XMSR, in
>> that same time period.
>>
>>
>
>What happened when they actually started work? :D

Uh oh.

[The Central Scrotinizer]

In article <0001HW.C0466CE10004892D213027E0@news.east.earthlink.net>,
Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:10:27 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
> (in message <mudshark-B6123D.19102721032006@news.giganews.com>):
>
> > In article <oY_Tf.168$TV1.113@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com>,
> > Tim Donohoe <tdonohoe@aol.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Did XM's stock spike when O&A announced they were going there?
> >
> > Yes, and so did Sirius...
> >
> > O&A announced their deal with XM on Aug 3rd, 2004 and started work Oct
> > 4, 2004.
> >
> > Aug 3rd 2004 = XMSR: $25.80
> > Oct 4th 2004 = XMSR: $29.88 +15.81% increase
> >
> > SIRI stock during the same time period:
> > Aug 3rd 2004 = SIRI: $2.42
> > Oct 4th 2004 = SIRI: $3.24 +33.88% increase
> >
> > XMSR experienced a 15.81% spike in their stock between the time O&A
> > announced their deal and their first day on air.
> >
> > SIRI experienced a 33.88% increase, more than double that of XMSR, in
> > that same time period.
> >
> >
>
> What happened when they actually started work? :D

There were mass suicides across the nation :(

--
The Central Scrotinizer

[SapperPest19]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 06:16:06 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
<mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:

>In article <0001HW.C0466CE10004892D213027E0@news.east.earthlink.net>,
> Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:10:27 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
>> (in message <mudshark-B6123D.19102721032006@news.giganews.com>):
>>
>> > In article <oY_Tf.168$TV1.113@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com>,
>> > Tim Donohoe <tdonohoe@aol.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Did XM's stock spike when O&A announced they were going there?
>> >
>> > Yes, and so did Sirius...
>> >
>> > O&A announced their deal with XM on Aug 3rd, 2004 and started work Oct
>> > 4, 2004.
>> >
>> > Aug 3rd 2004 = XMSR: $25.80
>> > Oct 4th 2004 = XMSR: $29.88 +15.81% increase
>> >
>> > SIRI stock during the same time period:
>> > Aug 3rd 2004 = SIRI: $2.42
>> > Oct 4th 2004 = SIRI: $3.24 +33.88% increase
>> >
>> > XMSR experienced a 15.81% spike in their stock between the time O&A
>> > announced their deal and their first day on air.
>> >
>> > SIRI experienced a 33.88% increase, more than double that of XMSR, in
>> > that same time period.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> What happened when they actually started work? :D
>
>There were mass suicides across the nation :(

Across the nation, huh? How could that be if nobody has heard of them?

Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com

[Hoody]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 08:42:22 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@lahhtf.com>
wrote:

> nobody has heard of them?

You really believe that ?

You've heard of them.

[Ricky Ticket]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 9:16:06 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
(in message <mudshark-CA3FD6.06160522032006@news.giganews.com>):

>>>> Did XM's stock spike when O&A announced they were going there?
>>>
>>> Yes, and so did Sirius...
>>>
>>> O&A announced their deal with XM on Aug 3rd, 2004 and started work Oct
>>> 4, 2004.
>>>
>>> Aug 3rd 2004 = XMSR: $25.80
>>> Oct 4th 2004 = XMSR: $29.88 +15.81% increase
>>>
>>> SIRI stock during the same time period:
>>> Aug 3rd 2004 = SIRI: $2.42
>>> Oct 4th 2004 = SIRI: $3.24 +33.88% increase
>>>
>>> XMSR experienced a 15.81% spike in their stock between the time O&A
>>> announced their deal and their first day on air.
>>>
>>> SIRI experienced a 33.88% increase, more than double that of XMSR, in
>>> that same time period.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> What happened when they actually started work? :D
>
> There were mass suicides across the nation :(

By Sirius stock holders. ;o)

--
"Yeah, I overreacted a little to someone blabbing my wife and parents' name
all over the internet." --Boom (explaining his most recent meltdown)

[The Central Scrotinizer]

In article <ugo222t0fsj8tljj1164f17sl9antta3o3@4ax.com>,
SapperPest19 <bob@lahhtf.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 06:16:06 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <0001HW.C0466CE10004892D213027E0@news.east.earthlink.net>,
> > Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:10:27 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
> >> (in message <mudshark-B6123D.19102721032006@news.giganews.com>):
> >>
> >> > In article <oY_Tf.168$TV1.113@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com>,
> >> > Tim Donohoe <tdonohoe@aol.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Did XM's stock spike when O&A announced they were going there?
> >> >
> >> > Yes, and so did Sirius...
> >> >
> >> > O&A announced their deal with XM on Aug 3rd, 2004 and started work Oct
> >> > 4, 2004.
> >> >
> >> > Aug 3rd 2004 = XMSR: $25.80
> >> > Oct 4th 2004 = XMSR: $29.88 +15.81% increase
> >> >
> >> > SIRI stock during the same time period:
> >> > Aug 3rd 2004 = SIRI: $2.42
> >> > Oct 4th 2004 = SIRI: $3.24 +33.88% increase
> >> >
> >> > XMSR experienced a 15.81% spike in their stock between the time O&A
> >> > announced their deal and their first day on air.
> >> >
> >> > SIRI experienced a 33.88% increase, more than double that of XMSR, in
> >> > that same time period.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> What happened when they actually started work? :D
> >
> >There were mass suicides across the nation :(
>
> Across the nation, huh? How could that be if nobody has heard of them?
>
> Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.usenet.com

Couple guys in LA, couple in Vegas, one or two in colorado, texas... A
few in the south and one in new york. Across the nation...

--
The Central Scrotinizer

[The Central Scrotinizer]

In article <mvo2225is9ld66f2jf2mlsk55iloktsusc@4ax.com>,
Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 08:42:22 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@lahhtf.com>
> wrote:
>
> > nobody has heard of them?
>
> You really believe that ?
>
> You've heard of them.

Good one!

--
The Central Scrotinizer

[The Central Scrotinizer]

In article <0001HW.C046CEBA001B8CB514D604A0@news.east.earthlink.net>,
Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 9:16:06 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
> (in message <mudshark-CA3FD6.06160522032006@news.giganews.com>):
>
> >>>> Did XM's stock spike when O&A announced they were going there?
> >>>
> >>> Yes, and so did Sirius...
> >>>
> >>> O&A announced their deal with XM on Aug 3rd, 2004 and started work Oct
> >>> 4, 2004.
> >>>
> >>> Aug 3rd 2004 = XMSR: $25.80
> >>> Oct 4th 2004 = XMSR: $29.88 +15.81% increase
> >>>
> >>> SIRI stock during the same time period:
> >>> Aug 3rd 2004 = SIRI: $2.42
> >>> Oct 4th 2004 = SIRI: $3.24 +33.88% increase
> >>>
> >>> XMSR experienced a 15.81% spike in their stock between the time O&A
> >>> announced their deal and their first day on air.
> >>>
> >>> SIRI experienced a 33.88% increase, more than double that of XMSR, in
> >>> that same time period.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> What happened when they actually started work? :D
> >
> > There were mass suicides across the nation :(
>
> By Sirius stock holders. ;o)

If you've bought either in the past year or two, you're hosed.

--
The Central Scrotinizer

[Hoody]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:09:39 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
<mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:

>If you've bought either in the past year or two, you're hosed.

One is the most successful satellite radio company ever.
One is the worst satellite radio company in history.

Choose one.

[Ricky Ticket]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:09:39 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
(in message <mudshark-4E99B0.07093922032006@news.giganews.com>):

> In article <0001HW.C046CEBA001B8CB514D604A0@news.east.earthlink.net>,
> Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 9:16:06 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
>> (in message <mudshark-CA3FD6.06160522032006@news.giganews.com>):
>>
>>>>>> Did XM's stock spike when O&A announced they were going there?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, and so did Sirius...
>>>>>
>>>>> O&A announced their deal with XM on Aug 3rd, 2004 and started work Oct
>>>>> 4, 2004.
>>>>>
>>>>> Aug 3rd 2004 = XMSR: $25.80
>>>>> Oct 4th 2004 = XMSR: $29.88 +15.81% increase
>>>>>
>>>>> SIRI stock during the same time period:
>>>>> Aug 3rd 2004 = SIRI: $2.42
>>>>> Oct 4th 2004 = SIRI: $3.24 +33.88% increase
>>>>>
>>>>> XMSR experienced a 15.81% spike in their stock between the time O&A
>>>>> announced their deal and their first day on air.
>>>>>
>>>>> SIRI experienced a 33.88% increase, more than double that of XMSR, in
>>>>> that same time period.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What happened when they actually started work? :D
>>>
>>> There were mass suicides across the nation :(
>>
>> By Sirius stock holders. ;o)
>
> If you've bought either in the past year or two, you're hosed.
>
>

Point being, Howard told his idiot fans to buy Sirius stock and some of the
retards did and probably lost their savings. Other fans just jumped on the
"me too" bandwagon and claimed to buy just to get air time. ::looks at boom::
:o)



--
"BTW, I bought Sirius stock Friday. I've already made a couple hundred bucks
with it." --Boom

[The Central Scrotinizer]

In article <0001HW.C046D5AD001D2F3B14D604A0@news.east.earthlink.net>,
Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:09:39 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
> (in message <mudshark-4E99B0.07093922032006@news.giganews.com>):
>
> > In article <0001HW.C046CEBA001B8CB514D604A0@news.east.earthlink.net>,
> > Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 9:16:06 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
> >> (in message <mudshark-CA3FD6.06160522032006@news.giganews.com>):
> >>
> >>>>>> Did XM's stock spike when O&A announced they were going there?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes, and so did Sirius...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> O&A announced their deal with XM on Aug 3rd, 2004 and started work Oct
> >>>>> 4, 2004.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Aug 3rd 2004 = XMSR: $25.80
> >>>>> Oct 4th 2004 = XMSR: $29.88 +15.81% increase
> >>>>>
> >>>>> SIRI stock during the same time period:
> >>>>> Aug 3rd 2004 = SIRI: $2.42
> >>>>> Oct 4th 2004 = SIRI: $3.24 +33.88% increase
> >>>>>
> >>>>> XMSR experienced a 15.81% spike in their stock between the time O&A
> >>>>> announced their deal and their first day on air.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> SIRI experienced a 33.88% increase, more than double that of XMSR, in
> >>>>> that same time period.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> What happened when they actually started work? :D
> >>>
> >>> There were mass suicides across the nation :(
> >>
> >> By Sirius stock holders. ;o)
> >
> > If you've bought either in the past year or two, you're hosed.
> >
> >
>
> Point being, Howard told his idiot fans to buy Sirius stock and some of the
> retards did and probably lost their savings. Other fans just jumped on the
> "me too" bandwagon and claimed to buy just to get air time. ::looks at boom::
> :o)

I never heard Stern telling anyone to buy SIRI. You're making ---- up
again to support your flacid argument.

--
The Central Scrotinizer

[The Central Scrotinizer]

In article <bdq222pjg6bbv6ibpo1grlnaqp78lpbrat@4ax.com>,
Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:09:39 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
>
> >If you've bought either in the past year or two, you're hosed.
>
> One is the most successful satellite radio company ever.
> One is the worst satellite radio company in history.
>
> Choose one.

One of the most successful satellite companies got too fat and slow in
their short time on the top and the "worst" SR company in history is
gaining fast. Run, fat boy, run! Rome is burning!

--
The Central Scrotinizer

[Hoody]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:25:54 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
<mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:

>In article <bdq222pjg6bbv6ibpo1grlnaqp78lpbrat@4ax.com>,
> Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:09:39 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
>> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
>>
>> >If you've bought either in the past year or two, you're hosed.
>>
>> One is the most successful satellite radio company ever.
>> One is the worst satellite radio company in history.
>>
>> Choose one.
>
>One of the most successful satellite companies got too fat and slow in
>their short time on the top and the "worst" SR company in history is
>gaining fast. Run, fat boy, run! Rome is burning!

Sorry I meant THE most successful satellite radio company.
You are correct in that everyone else is merely trying to play
catch-up.

[Hoody]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:21:15 GMT, Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:


>Point being, Howard told his idiot fans to buy Sirius stock and some of the
>retards did and probably lost their savings. Other fans just jumped on the
>"me too" bandwagon and claimed to buy just to get air time. ::looks at boom::
>:o)

Remember all those calls saying "Howard I bought Sirius stock becuase
of you, thanks brother"

Wha happnened ?

[SapperPest19]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:08:30 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
<mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:

>In article <ugo222t0fsj8tljj1164f17sl9antta3o3@4ax.com>,
> SapperPest19 <bob@lahhtf.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 06:16:06 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
>> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <0001HW.C0466CE10004892D213027E0@news.east.earthlink.net>,
>> > Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:10:27 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
>> >> (in message <mudshark-B6123D.19102721032006@news.giganews.com>):
>> >>
>> >> > In article <oY_Tf.168$TV1.113@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com>,
>> >> > Tim Donohoe <tdonohoe@aol.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Did XM's stock spike when O&A announced they were going there?
>> >> >
>> >> > Yes, and so did Sirius...
>> >> >
>> >> > O&A announced their deal with XM on Aug 3rd, 2004 and started work Oct
>> >> > 4, 2004.
>> >> >
>> >> > Aug 3rd 2004 = XMSR: $25.80
>> >> > Oct 4th 2004 = XMSR: $29.88 +15.81% increase
>> >> >
>> >> > SIRI stock during the same time period:
>> >> > Aug 3rd 2004 = SIRI: $2.42
>> >> > Oct 4th 2004 = SIRI: $3.24 +33.88% increase
>> >> >
>> >> > XMSR experienced a 15.81% spike in their stock between the time O&A
>> >> > announced their deal and their first day on air.
>> >> >
>> >> > SIRI experienced a 33.88% increase, more than double that of XMSR, in
>> >> > that same time period.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> What happened when they actually started work? :D
>> >
>> >There were mass suicides across the nation :(
>>
>> Across the nation, huh? How could that be if nobody has heard of them?
>>
>> Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> http://www.usenet.com
>
>Couple guys in LA, couple in Vegas, one or two in colorado, texas... A
>few in the south and one in new york. Across the nation...

And that is a mass suicide. That explains why you think stern has a
massive audience now.

Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com

[Ricky Ticket]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:24:40 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
(in message <mudshark-065561.07244022032006@news.giganews.com>):

>>>>>>>> Did XM's stock spike when O&A announced they were going there?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, and so did Sirius...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> O&A announced their deal with XM on Aug 3rd, 2004 and started work
>>>>>>> Oct
>>>>>>> 4, 2004.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aug 3rd 2004 = XMSR: $25.80
>>>>>>> Oct 4th 2004 = XMSR: $29.88 +15.81% increase
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SIRI stock during the same time period:
>>>>>>> Aug 3rd 2004 = SIRI: $2.42
>>>>>>> Oct 4th 2004 = SIRI: $3.24 +33.88% increase
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> XMSR experienced a 15.81% spike in their stock between the time O&A
>>>>>>> announced their deal and their first day on air.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SIRI experienced a 33.88% increase, more than double that of XMSR, in
>>>>>>> that same time period.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What happened when they actually started work? :D
>>>>>
>>>>> There were mass suicides across the nation :(
>>>>
>>>> By Sirius stock holders. ;o)
>>>
>>> If you've bought either in the past year or two, you're hosed.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Point being, Howard told his idiot fans to buy Sirius stock and some of
>> the
>> retards did and probably lost their savings. Other fans just jumped on the
>> "me too" bandwagon and claimed to buy just to get air time. ::looks at
>> boom::
>>> o)
>
> I never heard Stern telling anyone to buy SIRI. You're making ---- up
> again to support your flacid argument.

So are you claiming ignorance "I didn't hear it", or are you stating an
absolute that Stern never told his fans to buy Sirius? :o)

I¹ll give you an out. :D

--
"Yeah, I overreacted a little to someone blabbing my wife and parents' name
all over the internet." --Boom (explaining his most recent meltdown)

[Ricky Ticket]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:27:35 -0500, Hoody wrote
(in message <nmu22211f3bvahdut8taqbuh16mfmgqa20@4ax.com>):

> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:21:15 GMT, Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Point being, Howard told his idiot fans to buy Sirius stock and some of
>> the
>> retards did and probably lost their savings. Other fans just jumped on the
>> "me too" bandwagon and claimed to buy just to get air time. ::looks at
>> boom::
>>> o)
>
> Remember all those calls saying "Howard I bought Sirius stock becuase
> of you, thanks brother"
>
> Wha happnened ?

He stopped taking those calls when the SEC started sniffing around him. ;o)

--
"Yeah, I overreacted a little to someone blabbing my wife and parents' name
all over the internet." --Boom (explaining his most recent meltdown)

[Boom]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:28:14 GMT, Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:24:40 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
>(in message <mudshark-065561.07244022032006@news.giganews.com>):
>
>>>>>>>>> Did XM's stock spike when O&A announced they were going there?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, and so did Sirius...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> O&A announced their deal with XM on Aug 3rd, 2004 and started work
>>>>>>>> Oct
>>>>>>>> 4, 2004.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Aug 3rd 2004 = XMSR: $25.80
>>>>>>>> Oct 4th 2004 = XMSR: $29.88 +15.81% increase
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> SIRI stock during the same time period:
>>>>>>>> Aug 3rd 2004 = SIRI: $2.42
>>>>>>>> Oct 4th 2004 = SIRI: $3.24 +33.88% increase
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> XMSR experienced a 15.81% spike in their stock between the time O&A
>>>>>>>> announced their deal and their first day on air.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> SIRI experienced a 33.88% increase, more than double that of XMSR, in
>>>>>>>> that same time period.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What happened when they actually started work? :D
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There were mass suicides across the nation :(
>>>>>
>>>>> By Sirius stock holders. ;o)
>>>>
>>>> If you've bought either in the past year or two, you're hosed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Point being, Howard told his idiot fans to buy Sirius stock and some of
>>> the
>>> retards did and probably lost their savings. Other fans just jumped on the
>>> "me too" bandwagon and claimed to buy just to get air time. ::looks at
>>> boom::
>>>> o)
>>
>> I never heard Stern telling anyone to buy SIRI. You're making ---- up
>> again to support your flacid argument.
>
>So are you claiming ignorance "I didn't hear it", or are you stating an
>absolute that Stern never told his fans to buy Sirius? :o)
>
>I¹ll give you an out. :D

You mean give yourself an out, Peeboy. He told his fans to buy
Sirius. He never once told them to buy the stock.

Once again, let's hear it for Peeboy! Making us all feel better about
ourselves by displaying absolutely no thought processes in his
bull---- replies.

[Hoody]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:28:14 GMT, Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:


>> I never heard Stern telling anyone to buy SIRI. You're making ---- up
>> again to support your flacid argument.
>
>So are you claiming ignorance "I didn't hear it", or are you stating an
>absolute that Stern never told his fans to buy Sirius? :o)

Stern couldn't TELL people to buy Sirius stock, that would be
fraudulent.

Howie stock fraud was much more subtle and secret.

[Hoody]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:29:32 GMT, Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:27:35 -0500, Hoody wrote
>(in message <nmu22211f3bvahdut8taqbuh16mfmgqa20@4ax.com>):
>
>> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:21:15 GMT, Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Point being, Howard told his idiot fans to buy Sirius stock and some of
>>> the
>>> retards did and probably lost their savings. Other fans just jumped on the
>>> "me too" bandwagon and claimed to buy just to get air time. ::looks at
>>> boom::
>>>> o)
>>
>> Remember all those calls saying "Howard I bought Sirius stock becuase
>> of you, thanks brother"
>>
>> Wha happnened ?
>
>He stopped taking those calls when the SEC started sniffing around him. ;o)

what a revolution.

[The Central Scrotinizer]

In article <uku222tt7i1ca4u9fkqnp5p12br39gn0qt@4ax.com>,
Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:25:54 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <bdq222pjg6bbv6ibpo1grlnaqp78lpbrat@4ax.com>,
> > Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:09:39 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
> >> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >If you've bought either in the past year or two, you're hosed.
> >>
> >> One is the most successful satellite radio company ever.
> >> One is the worst satellite radio company in history.
> >>
> >> Choose one.
> >
> >One of the most successful satellite companies got too fat and slow in
> >their short time on the top and the "worst" SR company in history is
> >gaining fast. Run, fat boy, run! Rome is burning!
>
> Sorry I meant THE most successful satellite radio company.
> You are correct in that everyone else is merely trying to play
> catch-up.

Wait for it... Wait for it... It's coming soon.

--
The Central Scrotinizer

[The Central Scrotinizer]

In article <0001HW.C046F3710000CE35215A6C30@news.east.earthlink.net>,
Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:24:40 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
> (in message <mudshark-065561.07244022032006@news.giganews.com>):
>
> >>>>>>>> Did XM's stock spike when O&A announced they were going there?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yes, and so did Sirius...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> O&A announced their deal with XM on Aug 3rd, 2004 and started work
> >>>>>>> Oct
> >>>>>>> 4, 2004.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Aug 3rd 2004 = XMSR: $25.80
> >>>>>>> Oct 4th 2004 = XMSR: $29.88 +15.81% increase
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> SIRI stock during the same time period:
> >>>>>>> Aug 3rd 2004 = SIRI: $2.42
> >>>>>>> Oct 4th 2004 = SIRI: $3.24 +33.88% increase
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> XMSR experienced a 15.81% spike in their stock between the time O&A
> >>>>>>> announced their deal and their first day on air.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> SIRI experienced a 33.88% increase, more than double that of XMSR, in
> >>>>>>> that same time period.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What happened when they actually started work? :D
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There were mass suicides across the nation :(
> >>>>
> >>>> By Sirius stock holders. ;o)
> >>>
> >>> If you've bought either in the past year or two, you're hosed.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Point being, Howard told his idiot fans to buy Sirius stock and some of
> >> the
> >> retards did and probably lost their savings. Other fans just jumped on the
> >> "me too" bandwagon and claimed to buy just to get air time. ::looks at
> >> boom::
> >>> o)
> >
> > I never heard Stern telling anyone to buy SIRI. You're making ---- up
> > again to support your flacid argument.
>
> So are you claiming ignorance "I didn't hear it", or are you stating an
> absolute that Stern never told his fans to buy Sirius? :o)
>
> I¹ll give you an out. :D

I can't say with absolution because I don't hang on his every word, but
I've never heard him say it. And you can bet your ass if he said it on
KROCK, that would be named front and center in the law suit.

But hey, if he did tell people to buy and they did, that's kind of
stupid on the listeners part, but they'll be fine. I think the highest
the stock has been since he started was around $8. It will get well
above $8.

--
The Central Scrotinizer

[The Central Scrotinizer]

In article <nmu22211f3bvahdut8taqbuh16mfmgqa20@4ax.com>,
Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:21:15 GMT, Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:
>
>
> >Point being, Howard told his idiot fans to buy Sirius stock and some of the
> >retards did and probably lost their savings. Other fans just jumped on the
> >"me too" bandwagon and claimed to buy just to get air time. ::looks at
> >boom::
> >:o)
>
> Remember all those calls saying "Howard I bought Sirius stock becuase
> of you, thanks brother"
>
> Wha happnened ?

There's a big difference between people buying it because of him, and
because he told them to. I think he tells people to buy much worse
things than stock, anyway. Soothe Herbs? WTF?

--
The Central Scrotinizer

[The Central Scrotinizer]

In article <ic0322tg6a1avgoj1kmsqkbuaoctlrd9ou@4ax.com>,
SapperPest19 <bob@lahhtf.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:08:30 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <ugo222t0fsj8tljj1164f17sl9antta3o3@4ax.com>,
> > SapperPest19 <bob@lahhtf.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 06:16:06 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
> >> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <0001HW.C0466CE10004892D213027E0@news.east.earthlink.net>,
> >> > Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:10:27 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
> >> >> (in message <mudshark-B6123D.19102721032006@news.giganews.com>):
> >> >>
> >> >> > In article <oY_Tf.168$TV1.113@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com>,
> >> >> > Tim Donohoe <tdonohoe@aol.com> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Did XM's stock spike when O&A announced they were going there?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Yes, and so did Sirius...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > O&A announced their deal with XM on Aug 3rd, 2004 and started work
> >> >> > Oct
> >> >> > 4, 2004.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Aug 3rd 2004 = XMSR: $25.80
> >> >> > Oct 4th 2004 = XMSR: $29.88 +15.81% increase
> >> >> >
> >> >> > SIRI stock during the same time period:
> >> >> > Aug 3rd 2004 = SIRI: $2.42
> >> >> > Oct 4th 2004 = SIRI: $3.24 +33.88% increase
> >> >> >
> >> >> > XMSR experienced a 15.81% spike in their stock between the time O&A
> >> >> > announced their deal and their first day on air.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > SIRI experienced a 33.88% increase, more than double that of XMSR, in
> >> >> > that same time period.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> What happened when they actually started work? :D
> >> >
> >> >There were mass suicides across the nation :(
> >>
> >> Across the nation, huh? How could that be if nobody has heard of them?
> >>
> >> Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------
> >> ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------
> >> http://www.usenet.com
> >
> >Couple guys in LA, couple in Vegas, one or two in colorado, texas... A
> >few in the south and one in new york. Across the nation...
>
> And that is a mass suicide. That explains why you think stern has a
> massive audience now.
>
> Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.usenet.com

Damn. Got me.

--
The Central Scrotinizer

[Ricky Ticket]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 12:33:56 -0500, Boom wrote
(in message <7g2322ds3i265df6hpeaucjpfnbsun1rk5@4ax.com>):

>>>> Point being, Howard told his idiot fans to buy Sirius stock and some of
>>>> the
>>>> retards did and probably lost their savings. Other fans just jumped on
>>>> the
>>>> "me too" bandwagon and claimed to buy just to get air time. ::looks at
>>>> boom::
>>>>> o)
>>>
>>> I never heard Stern telling anyone to buy SIRI. You're making ---- up
>>> again to support your flacid argument.
>>
>> So are you claiming ignorance "I didn't hear it", or are you stating an
>> absolute that Stern never told his fans to buy Sirius? :o)
>>
>> I¹ll give you an out. :D
>
> You mean give yourself an out, Peeboy. He told his fans to buy
> Sirius. He never once told them to buy the stock.
>
> Once again, let's hear it for Peeboy! Making us all feel better about
> ourselves by displaying absolutely no thought processes in his
> bull---- replies.

Pirates of the Caribbean closed today "cast member"? :D

--
"Yeah, I overreacted a little to someone blabbing my wife and parents' name
all over the internet." --Boom (explaining his most recent meltdown)

[Hoody]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:10:46 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
<mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:

>Wait for it... Wait for it... It's coming soon.

How long will it take ?
what happened to the "Stern Effect" ?

[Hoody]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:20:40 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
<mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:

>There's a big difference between people buying it because of him, and
>because he told them to. I think he tells people to buy much worse
>things than stock, anyway. Soothe Herbs? WTF?

I'm just saying he's not talking about stocks anymore because he is
emabrrases. He was supposed to be saving the company but the stock
continues to plummet.

[The Central Scrotinizer]

In article <48g522l3bl1f20o2pa7hivgtf3vpdci83p@4ax.com>,
Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:20:40 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
>
> >There's a big difference between people buying it because of him, and
> >because he told them to. I think he tells people to buy much worse
> >things than stock, anyway. Soothe Herbs? WTF?
>
> I'm just saying he's not talking about stocks anymore because he is
> emabrrases. He was supposed to be saving the company but the stock
> continues to plummet.

he never really talked about them in the first place. he'd get the
occasional caller, but it's never been a topic that has all of a sudden
disappeared... Plus, the stocks been on a down-trend since he started,
so it what you say is true, he shouldn't have been talking about it.

--
The Central Scrotinizer

[Hoody]

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 07:51:23 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
<mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:

>he never really talked about them in the first place. he'd get the
>occasional caller, but it's never been a topic that has all of a sudden
>disappeared... Plus, the stocks been on a down-trend since he started,
>so it what you say is true, he shouldn't have been talking about it.

He's ashamed. He was supposed to be helping the company. He got
their stock to plummet and now they are being sued.

Some revolution.

[The Central Scrotinizer]

In article <0dh5221bv8j3ei9uml68n27i1kd5gmb94r@4ax.com>,
Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 07:51:23 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
>
> >he never really talked about them in the first place. he'd get the
> >occasional caller, but it's never been a topic that has all of a sudden
> >disappeared... Plus, the stocks been on a down-trend since he started,
> >so it what you say is true, he shouldn't have been talking about it.
>
> He's ashamed. He was supposed to be helping the company. He got
> their stock to plummet and now they are being sued.
>
> Some revolution.

Stern is being sued, not Sirius. The stock is STILL worth more than when
he signed, even though it's been declining since January.

Since you're an expert on stocks, what's up with XM stock. We're always
talking about Sirius and Stern, understandably, though since XM and O&A
aren't really that relevant anymore...

--
The Central Scrotinizer

[Hoody]

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 08:08:15 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
<mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:

>Stern is being sued, not Sirius.

Check the lawsuit, genius.
Stern, Buchwald, and Sirius are being sued. Sirius specifically for
encouraging Howie to breach his contract,

Yet another issue you claim to be an expert on, but do not grasp the
most BASIC of facts.

[The Central Scrotinizer]

User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Mac OS X)
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:00:28 -0800
Message-ID: <mudshark-DFFCA6.09002823032006@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 22
X-Trace: sv3-mLwxuY+cfbWLrcM2Zs+lhnFcVSTsb99S9BE2QXJPeDAS2obO7O2a6EtplgNJ8+uCzuPnzSJ2lfoIpWN!9NQ7vEE0/fsP8PpNW35HW3J+KJbn/4NJA06RWLACX1thdbZ2x64+r+XftKy/d3bdMoReTD5gFx0K!2CeM
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
Xref: authen.yellow.readfreenews.net alt.fan.howard-stern:901909 alt.fan.opie-and-anthony:9556 alt.radio.satellite:31703

In article <ati522l7bd5a52ollbdebeprbdvsdf3999@4ax.com>,
Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 08:08:15 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
>
> >Stern is being sued, not Sirius.
>
> Check the lawsuit, genius.
> Stern, Buchwald, and Sirius are being sued. Sirius specifically for
> encouraging Howie to breach his contract,
>
> Yet another issue you claim to be an expert on, but do not grasp the
> most BASIC of facts.

When did I claim to be the expert on anything?

I didn't realize Sirius was named in the suit... Now the drop in stock
makes a lot more sense. Thanks.

--
The Central Scrotinizer

[Ricky Ticket]

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:00:28 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
(in message <mudshark-DFFCA6.09002823032006@news.giganews.com>):

> From: The Central Scrotinizer <mudshark@edgewater.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.fan.howard-stern, alt.fan.opie-and-anthony,
> alt.radio.satellite
>
> In article <ati522l7bd5a52ollbdebeprbdvsdf3999@4ax.com>,
> Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 08:08:15 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
>> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Stern is being sued, not Sirius.
>>
>> Check the lawsuit, genius.
>> Stern, Buchwald, and Sirius are being sued. Sirius specifically for
>> encouraging Howie to breach his contract,
>>
>> Yet another issue you claim to be an expert on, but do not grasp the
>> most BASIC of facts.
>
> When did I claim to be the expert on anything?

How could you when the basic facts elude you? :o)


--
"Yeah, I overreacted a little to someone blabbing my wife and parents' name
all over the internet." --Boom (explaining his most recent meltdown)

[The Central Scrotinizer]

In article <0001HW.C0486D5C0002EA3920CAD450@news.east.earthlink.net>,
Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:00:28 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
> (in message <mudshark-DFFCA6.09002823032006@news.giganews.com>):
>
> > From: The Central Scrotinizer <mudshark@edgewater.com>
> > Newsgroups: alt.fan.howard-stern, alt.fan.opie-and-anthony,
> > alt.radio.satellite
> >
> > In article <ati522l7bd5a52ollbdebeprbdvsdf3999@4ax.com>,
> > Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 08:08:15 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
> >> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Stern is being sued, not Sirius.
> >>
> >> Check the lawsuit, genius.
> >> Stern, Buchwald, and Sirius are being sued. Sirius specifically for
> >> encouraging Howie to breach his contract,
> >>
> >> Yet another issue you claim to be an expert on, but do not grasp the
> >> most BASIC of facts.
> >
> > When did I claim to be the expert on anything?
>
> How could you when the basic facts elude you? :o)

----, ----breath, I'm one of the few that posts facts.

--
The Central Scrotinizer

[Ricky Ticket]

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:52:18 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
(in message <mudshark-FB058E.19521823032006@news.giganews.com>):

> From: The Central Scrotinizer <mudshark@edgewater.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.fan.howard-stern, alt.fan.opie-and-anthony,
> alt.radio.satellite
>
> In article <