Here is Howard Stern's Revolution!!!! [Archive]

SapperPest19

March 20th, 2006, 12:34 AM

On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 22:56:12 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
<mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:

>In article <1142828960.314478.49740@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
> "Jack Wills" <wills.jack@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> SapperPest19 wrote:
>> > http://www.howardstern.com/flt/ht/704.html
>>
>> Which is better - Howard Stern On Demand or Ope and Anthony On Demand?
>
>I've never seen Ape and Othany on OnDemand, but I saw Jeff Won't Leave,
>which is high-larious, and the Savanah Samson on the sybian. Great
>stuff. Are O&A on OnDemand?

No. And it's still a better value than stern On Demand.

Out of curiosity, why does stern censor the pics on his site? This is
not a knock (ok, maybe a little one) but I would have thought the
uncensored sensation would have an uncensored site as well.

And bonus point to the one who can find the obvious grammatical error
on the site. Hint: the page is linked from the home page. I know
nobody is perfect but this is a pretty basic mistake.

SapperPest19

March 20th, 2006, 12:34 AM

On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 22:54:18 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
<mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:

>In article <5s4s12hl9q4ljm1i3inrndqumkfoqkargr@4ax.com>,
> SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
>
>> http://www.howardstern.com/flt/ht/704.html
>
>And it's growing out of Artie's forehead. Now that's funny.

It's not just funny....it's revolutionary.

The Central Scrotinizer

March 20th, 2006, 01:30 AM

In article <6cms125j7ate9eak20b09tpahe02uc6a5v@4ax.com>,
SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 22:56:12 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <1142828960.314478.49740@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
> > "Jack Wills" <wills.jack@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> SapperPest19 wrote:
> >> > http://www.howardstern.com/flt/ht/704.html
> >>
> >> Which is better - Howard Stern On Demand or Ope and Anthony On Demand?
> >
> >I've never seen Ape and Othany on OnDemand, but I saw Jeff Won't Leave,
> >which is high-larious, and the Savanah Samson on the sybian. Great
> >stuff. Are O&A on OnDemand?
>
> No. And it's still a better value than stern On Demand.

Well, of course if it doesn't exist, it's a better value, right? I'm not
sure I get you.

>
> Out of curiosity, why does stern censor the pics on his site? This is
> not a knock (ok, maybe a little one) but I would have thought the
> uncensored sensation would have an uncensored site as well.

I was wondering that same thing. I want to see some tittay!

>
> And bonus point to the one who can find the obvious grammatical error
> on the site. Hint: the page is linked from the home page. I know
> nobody is perfect but this is a pretty basic mistake.

--
The Central Scrotinizer

The Central Scrotinizer

March 20th, 2006, 01:30 AM

In article <ilms129uk72mum44bc2qm5nvog26r5732b@4ax.com>,
SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 22:54:18 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <5s4s12hl9q4ljm1i3inrndqumkfoqkargr@4ax.com>,
> > SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
> >
> >> http://www.howardstern.com/flt/ht/704.html
> >
> >And it's growing out of Artie's forehead. Now that's funny.
>
> It's not just funny....it's revolutionary.

Che would be proud.

--
The Central Scrotinizer

johnnyxgriswold@yahoo.com

March 20th, 2006, 09:30 AM

I'm a huge O&A fan and I would NEVER pay for them OnDemand. Stern
wants to milk any and all of his sheepish fans and I can't believe you
can't see right through that. Suckers.

Buzzer

March 20th, 2006, 09:30 AM

johnnyxgriswold@yahoo.com wrote in news:1142871478.923213.35440
@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:

> I'm a huge O&A fan and I would NEVER pay for them OnDemand. Stern
> wants to milk any and all of his sheepish fans and I can't believe you
> can't see right through that. Suckers.
>
>

You have to remember back in the day when you were a fan and you belived.
You watched private parts and belived that Stern was the underdog, and you
belived he cared about his fans, and you belived that he fought the power
of management to bring this sort of show to the people for the people.

What we thought was fact turned out to be nothing more than a fictional
story. They are still under the belief that Private parts is fact and not
fiction.

Once the subscription fees are increased and Stern eventually goes to a
premium channel, some of them will wake up and some will still be hanging
on to that last thread of hope....

The Central Scrotinizer

March 20th, 2006, 09:30 AM

In article <1142871478.923213.35440@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
johnnyxgriswold@yahoo.com wrote:

> I'm a huge O&A fan and I would NEVER pay for them OnDemand. Stern
> wants to milk any and all of his sheepish fans and I can't believe you
> can't see right through that. Suckers.

Good for you, lame ass.

--
The Central Scrotinizer

The Central Scrotinizer

March 20th, 2006, 09:59 AM

In article <Xns978C73FFB38581@207.115.17.102>, Buzzer <none@email.org>
wrote:

> Once the subscription fees are increased and Stern eventually goes to a
> premium channel, some of them will wake up and some will still be hanging
> on to that last thread of hope....

According to Sapper, if Stern goes premium, he will be a success. Aren't
the both of you a part of the pest army? If so, you might want to get on
the same page, being in an army and all. Make you look even less
credible than you already are.

--
The Central Scrotinizer

Buzzer

March 20th, 2006, 09:59 AM

The Central Scrotinizer <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote in
news:mudshark-11D4B8.08434020032006@news.giganews.com:

> In article <Xns978C73FFB38581@207.115.17.102>, Buzzer <none@email.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Once the subscription fees are increased and Stern eventually goes to
>> a premium channel, some of them will wake up and some will still be
>> hanging on to that last thread of hope....
>
> According to Sapper, if Stern goes premium, he will be a success.
> Aren't the both of you a part of the pest army? If so, you might want
> to get on the same page, being in an army and all. Make you look even
> less credible than you already are.
>

It is the same argument that you guys have. O&A were on premium because
they were a failure and they were taken off premium because they were a
failure.

Hoody

March 20th, 2006, 10:31 AM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:24:01 GMT, Buzzer <none@email.org> wrote:

>You have to remember back in the day when you were a fan and you belived.
>You watched private parts and belived that Stern was the underdog, and you
>belived he cared about his fans, and you belived that he fought the power
>of management to bring this sort of show to the people for the people.

It's all about Alison.
His whole career ended up being a lie.

Hoody

March 20th, 2006, 10:31 AM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 08:43:40 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
<mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:

>According to Sapper, if Stern goes premium, he will be a success. Aren't
>the both of you a part of the pest army? If so, you might want to get on
>the same page, being in an army and all. Make you look even less
>credible than you already are.

Right, the reason Howie is not on a premium channel is becuase they
knew no one would subscribe.

Boom

March 20th, 2006, 10:31 AM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:56:31 GMT, Buzzer <none@email.org> wrote:

>The Central Scrotinizer <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote in
>news:mudshark-11D4B8.08434020032006@news.giganews.com:
>
>> In article <Xns978C73FFB38581@207.115.17.102>, Buzzer <none@email.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Once the subscription fees are increased and Stern eventually goes to
>>> a premium channel, some of them will wake up and some will still be
>>> hanging on to that last thread of hope....
>>
>> According to Sapper, if Stern goes premium, he will be a success.
>> Aren't the both of you a part of the pest army? If so, you might want
>> to get on the same page, being in an army and all. Make you look even
>> less credible than you already are.
>>
>
>It is the same argument that you guys have. O&A were on premium because
>they were a failure and they were taken off premium because they were a
>failure.

Wrong, dummy. O&A were on premium because Xm thought people cared
about them as much as Howard Stern. They were taken off because they
were a failure.

The Central Scrotinizer

March 20th, 2006, 10:31 AM

In article <jnot12hertivibgb44vahhqb6gqiqjtba7@fe05.buzzardnews.com>,
Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:24:01 GMT, Buzzer <none@email.org> wrote:
>
> >You have to remember back in the day when you were a fan and you belived.
> >You watched private parts and belived that Stern was the underdog, and you
> >belived he cared about his fans, and you belived that he fought the power
> >of management to bring this sort of show to the people for the people.
>
> It's all about Alison.
> His whole career ended up being a lie.

So you've never had a change of heart about something that at one time
you were very passionate about?

--
The Central Scrotinizer

The Central Scrotinizer

March 20th, 2006, 10:31 AM

In article <ooot12taf5h8hf8rde198he1ni8hqdmm88@fe05.buzzardnews.com>,
Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 08:43:40 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
>
> >According to Sapper, if Stern goes premium, he will be a success. Aren't
> >the both of you a part of the pest army? If so, you might want to get on
> >the same page, being in an army and all. Make you look even less
> >credible than you already are.
>
> Right, the reason Howie is not on a premium channel is becuase they
> knew no one would subscribe.

Read the other threads and don't waste everyone's time.

--
The Central Scrotinizer

SapperPest19

March 20th, 2006, 10:59 AM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 00:19:27 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
<mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:

>In article <6cms125j7ate9eak20b09tpahe02uc6a5v@4ax.com>,
> SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 22:56:12 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
>> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <1142828960.314478.49740@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
>> > "Jack Wills" <wills.jack@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> SapperPest19 wrote:
>> >> > http://www.howardstern.com/flt/ht/704.html
>> >>
>> >> Which is better - Howard Stern On Demand or Ope and Anthony On Demand?
>> >
>> >I've never seen Ape and Othany on OnDemand, but I saw Jeff Won't Leave,
>> >which is high-larious, and the Savanah Samson on the sybian. Great
>> >stuff. Are O&A on OnDemand?
>>
>> No. And it's still a better value than stern On Demand.
>
>Well, of course if it doesn't exist, it's a better value, right? I'm not
>sure I get you.

Actually, in a way, it does exist. It is about $60 a year. You get a
two camera shoot, sometimes 3. It's available for all the shows and
even for some unofficial o&a events.

>> Out of curiosity, why does stern censor the pics on his site? This is
>> not a knock (ok, maybe a little one) but I would have thought the
>> uncensored sensation would have an uncensored site as well.
>
>I was wondering that same thing. I want to see some tittay!
>
>>
>> And bonus point to the one who can find the obvious grammatical error
>> on the site. Hint: the page is linked from the home page. I know
>> nobody is perfect but this is a pretty basic mistake.

Boom

March 20th, 2006, 10:59 AM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:29:47 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@lahhtf.com>
wrote:

>Actually, in a way, it does exist. It is about $60 a year. You get a
>two camera shoot, sometimes 3. It's available for all the shows and
>even for some unofficial o&a events.

A whole 3 cameras, huh?

SapperPest19

March 20th, 2006, 10:59 AM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:34:05 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:29:47 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@lahhtf.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Actually, in a way, it does exist. It is about $60 a year. You get a
>>two camera shoot, sometimes 3. It's available for all the shows and
>>even for some unofficial o&a events.
>
>A whole 3 cameras, huh?

Let me go back and read my post again.......yes, 3 cameras. Sometimes.
Yep, that's what I wrote.

Hoody

March 20th, 2006, 10:59 AM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:09:22 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:

>Wrong, dummy. O&A were on premium because Xm thought people cared
>about them as much as Howard Stern. They were taken off because they
>were a failure.

So not being on premium = failure
Howie is not on a premium channel, he must be a failure.

Hoody

March 20th, 2006, 10:59 AM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:30:51 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
<mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:

>So you've never had a change of heart about something that at one time
>you were very passionate about?

Are you talking about his marraige or passion for radio ? Both are in
the toilet.

The Central Scrotinizer

March 20th, 2006, 10:59 AM

In article <svqt1254koqcq3ptlr4bilbkakg3c83890@fe05.buzzardnews.com>,
Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:30:51 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
>
> >So you've never had a change of heart about something that at one time
> >you were very passionate about?
>
> Are you talking about his marraige or passion for radio ? Both are in
> the toilet.

Way to avoid the question, waterhead.

--
The Central Scrotinizer

Boom

March 20th, 2006, 11:30 AM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:30:51 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
<mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:

>In article <jnot12hertivibgb44vahhqb6gqiqjtba7@fe05.buzzardnews.com>,
> Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:24:01 GMT, Buzzer <none@email.org> wrote:
>>
>> >You have to remember back in the day when you were a fan and you belived.
>> >You watched private parts and belived that Stern was the underdog, and you
>> >belived he cared about his fans, and you belived that he fought the power
>> >of management to bring this sort of show to the people for the people.
>>
>> It's all about Alison.
>> His whole career ended up being a lie.
>
>So you've never had a change of heart about something that at one time
>you were very passionate about?

I don't think Buzzer's lived long enough to be passionate about
anything except masturbating and chasing Howard's limo down the street
carrying a "Hoohoo" sign.

The Central Scrotinizer

March 20th, 2006, 11:30 AM

In article <ctpt12tk5a309ak2va2vr1r709ueqp7o0r@4ax.com>,
Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:30:51 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <jnot12hertivibgb44vahhqb6gqiqjtba7@fe05.buzzardnews.com>,
> > Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:24:01 GMT, Buzzer <none@email.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> >You have to remember back in the day when you were a fan and you belived.
> >> >You watched private parts and belived that Stern was the underdog, and
> >> >you
> >> >belived he cared about his fans, and you belived that he fought the power
> >> >of management to bring this sort of show to the people for the people.
> >>
> >> It's all about Alison.
> >> His whole career ended up being a lie.
> >
> >So you've never had a change of heart about something that at one time
> >you were very passionate about?
>
> I don't think Buzzer's lived long enough to be passionate about
> anything except masturbating and chasing Howard's limo down the street
> carrying a "Hoohoo" sign.

Now that my friend, is hilarious. You and Sapper have had a couple
humdingers today.

--
The Central Scrotinizer

Hoody

March 20th, 2006, 12:30 PM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:35:41 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:30:51 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
><mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
>
>>In article <jnot12hertivibgb44vahhqb6gqiqjtba7@fe05.buzzardnews.com>,
>> Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:24:01 GMT, Buzzer <none@email.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> >You have to remember back in the day when you were a fan and you belived.
>>> >You watched private parts and belived that Stern was the underdog, and you
>>> >belived he cared about his fans, and you belived that he fought the power
>>> >of management to bring this sort of show to the people for the people.
>>>
>>> It's all about Alison.
>>> His whole career ended up being a lie.
>>
>>So you've never had a change of heart about something that at one time
>>you were very passionate about?
>
>I don't think Buzzer's lived long enough to be passionate about
>anything except masturbating and chasing Howard's limo down the street
>carrying a "Hoohoo" sign.

Does that make Howie's lies true ?

Hoody

March 20th, 2006, 12:30 PM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:58:47 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
<mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:

>> Are you talking about his marraige or passion for radio ? Both are in
>> the toilet.
>
>Way to avoid the question, waterhead.

Way to confirm the statement.

The Central Scrotinizer

March 20th, 2006, 12:30 PM

In article <orut12t82ral3nnhh8kfgcaqnt92gmvvsp@fe05.buzzardnews.com>,
Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:58:47 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
>
>
> >> Are you talking about his marraige or passion for radio ? Both are in
> >> the toilet.
> >
> >Way to avoid the question, waterhead.
>
> Way to confirm the statement.

You have an amazing ability to draw conclusions from nothing.

--
The Central Scrotinizer

The Central Scrotinizer

March 20th, 2006, 12:30 PM

In article <0rut12t0jkd766p7gt0minlsj6pn16ffmv@fe05.buzzardnews.com>,
Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:35:41 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:30:51 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
> ><mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
> >
> >>In article <jnot12hertivibgb44vahhqb6gqiqjtba7@fe05.buzzardnews.com>,
> >> Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:24:01 GMT, Buzzer <none@email.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >You have to remember back in the day when you were a fan and you
> >>> >belived.
> >>> >You watched private parts and belived that Stern was the underdog, and
> >>> >you
> >>> >belived he cared about his fans, and you belived that he fought the
> >>> >power
> >>> >of management to bring this sort of show to the people for the people.
> >>>
> >>> It's all about Alison.
> >>> His whole career ended up being a lie.
> >>
> >>So you've never had a change of heart about something that at one time
> >>you were very passionate about?
> >
> >I don't think Buzzer's lived long enough to be passionate about
> >anything except masturbating and chasing Howard's limo down the street
> >carrying a "Hoohoo" sign.
>
> Does that make Howie's lies true ?

Does it make your fantasy world reality?

--
The Central Scrotinizer

Hoody

March 20th, 2006, 12:30 PM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:03:21 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
<mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:

>In article <orut12t82ral3nnhh8kfgcaqnt92gmvvsp@fe05.buzzardnews.com>,
> Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:58:47 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
>> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >> Are you talking about his marraige or passion for radio ? Both are in
>> >> the toilet.
>> >
>> >Way to avoid the question, waterhead.
>>
>> Way to confirm the statement.
>
>You have an amazing ability to draw conclusions from nothing.

You provide plenty of nothing.

The Central Scrotinizer

March 20th, 2006, 12:30 PM

In article <nevt12ljgoo1ushpjr0jkfko8eh4o7l39t@fe05.buzzardnews.com>,
Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:03:21 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <orut12t82ral3nnhh8kfgcaqnt92gmvvsp@fe05.buzzardnews.com>,
> > Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:58:47 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
> >> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> >> Are you talking about his marraige or passion for radio ? Both are in
> >> >> the toilet.
> >> >
> >> >Way to avoid the question, waterhead.
> >>
> >> Way to confirm the statement.
> >
> >You have an amazing ability to draw conclusions from nothing.
>
> You provide plenty of nothing.

Which is why you reply to my every post.

--
The Central Scrotinizer

The Cunning Linguist :Þ- Cmdr. Usenet OperAtions

March 20th, 2006, 02:31 PM

"The Central Scrotinizer" <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote in message
news:mudshark-20475F.22561219032006@news.giganews.com...
> In article <1142828960.314478.49740@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
> "Jack Wills" <wills.jack@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > SapperPest19 wrote:
> > > http://www.howardstern.com/flt/ht/704.html
> >
> > Which is better - Howard Stern On Demand or Ope and Anthony On Demand?
>
> I've never seen Ape and Othany on OnDemand, but I saw Jeff Won't Leave,

Ape and Othany! Ha ha ha ha ha! That's hilarious
What's an othany?

> which is high-larious, and the Savanah Samson on the sybian. Great
> stuff. Are O&A on OnDemand?

You can watch the show live, every day, for free. Unlike greedy Hoohoo the
Jew, O&A do things just to make the fans happy
Just like you make your fans happy, Scrotumlicker

--
The Cunning Linguist :Þ- Commander, Usenet OperAtions

O&A always win in the end
Hoohoo always whines in the end

The Cunning Linguist :Þ- Cmdr. Usenet OperAtions

March 20th, 2006, 02:31 PM

"The Central Scrotinizer" <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote in message
news:mudshark-E13C3F.00192720032006@news.giganews.com...
> In article <6cms125j7ate9eak20b09tpahe02uc6a5v@4ax.com>,
> SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:

> > Out of curiosity, why does stern censor the pics on his site? This is
> > not a knock (ok, maybe a little one) but I would have thought the
> > uncensored sensation would have an uncensored site as well.
>
> I was wondering that same thing. I want to see some tittay!

I am sure the only ones you ever get to see are electronically reproduced
Except for when your mom breast feeds you

--
The Cunning Linguist :Þ- Commander, Usenet OperAtions

O&A always win in the end
Hoohoo always whines in the end

The Central Scrotinizer

March 20th, 2006, 02:31 PM

In article <vNETf.29712$ty4.26721@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com>,
"The Cunning Linguist :Þ- Cmdr. Usenet OperAtions"
<the_witchboy@yahooX.com> wrote:

> What's an othany?

It's the empty space between your ears.

--
The Central Scrotinizer

Tim Donohoe

March 20th, 2006, 03:30 PM

Buzzer wrote:

> johnnyxgriswold@yahoo.com wrote in news:1142871478.923213.35440
> @z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>>I'm a huge O&A fan and I would NEVER pay for them OnDemand. Stern
>>wants to milk any and all of his sheepish fans and I can't believe you
>>can't see right through that. Suckers.
>>
>>
>
>
> You have to remember back in the day when you were a fan and you belived.
> You watched private parts and belived that Stern was the underdog, and you
> belived he cared about his fans, and you belived that he fought the power
> of management to bring this sort of show to the people for the people.
>
> What we thought was fact turned out to be nothing more than a fictional
> story. They are still under the belief that Private parts is fact and not
> fiction.
>

By "we" you mean emptyheaded simpletons like you who listen to a radio
show expecting the truth. It is understandable why you get so obsessed,
but most people don't listen to Howard as a path to enlightenment.

Tim Donohoe

March 20th, 2006, 03:30 PM

Buzzer wrote:

> The Central Scrotinizer <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote in
> news:mudshark-11D4B8.08434020032006@news.giganews.com:
>
>
>>In article <Xns978C73FFB38581@207.115.17.102>, Buzzer <none@email.org>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Once the subscription fees are increased and Stern eventually goes to
>>>a premium channel, some of them will wake up and some will still be
>>>hanging on to that last thread of hope....
>>
>>According to Sapper, if Stern goes premium, he will be a success.
>>Aren't the both of you a part of the pest army? If so, you might want
>>to get on the same page, being in an army and all. Make you look even
>>less credible than you already are.
>>
>
>
> It is the same argument that you guys have. O&A were on premium because
> they were a failure and they were taken off premium because they were a
> failure.
>

How shocking that you can't understand a simple sensible argument and
pretend that someone said that. Oddly enough I heard a Anthony make that
exact same strawman argument on his show. Have you ever had an original
idea?

Tim Donohoe

March 20th, 2006, 03:30 PM

The Cunning Linguist :Þ- Cmdr. Usenet OperAtions wrote:

> "The Central Scrotinizer" <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote in message
> news:mudshark-20475F.22561219032006@news.giganews.com...
>
>>In article <1142828960.314478.49740@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
>> "Jack Wills" <wills.jack@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>SapperPest19 wrote:
>>>
>>>>http://www.howardstern.com/flt/ht/704.html
>>>
>>>Which is better - Howard Stern On Demand or Ope and Anthony On Demand?
>>
>>I've never seen Ape and Othany on OnDemand, but I saw Jeff Won't Leave,
>
>
> Ape and Othany! Ha ha ha ha ha! That's hilarious
> What's an othany?
>
>
>>which is high-larious, and the Savanah Samson on the sybian. Great
>>stuff. Are O&A on OnDemand?
>
>
> You can watch the show live, every day, for free. Unlike greedy Hoohoo the
> Jew, O&A do things just to make the fans happy
> Just like you make your fans happy, Scrotumlicker
>

You can watch dogs ---- in the park for free every day, live and
everything, only a lonely retard would take advantage of the opportunity.

SapperPest19

March 20th, 2006, 03:30 PM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:09:52 GMT, Tim Donohoe <tdonohoe@aol.com>
wrote:

>The Cunning Linguist :Þ- Cmdr. Usenet OperAtions wrote:
>
>> "The Central Scrotinizer" <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote in message
>> news:mudshark-20475F.22561219032006@news.giganews.com...
>>
>>>In article <1142828960.314478.49740@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
>>> "Jack Wills" <wills.jack@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>SapperPest19 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>http://www.howardstern.com/flt/ht/704.html
>>>>
>>>>Which is better - Howard Stern On Demand or Ope and Anthony On Demand?
>>>
>>>I've never seen Ape and Othany on OnDemand, but I saw Jeff Won't Leave,
>>
>>
>> Ape and Othany! Ha ha ha ha ha! That's hilarious
>> What's an othany?
>>
>>
>>>which is high-larious, and the Savanah Samson on the sybian. Great
>>>stuff. Are O&A on OnDemand?
>>
>>
>> You can watch the show live, every day, for free. Unlike greedy Hoohoo the
>> Jew, O&A do things just to make the fans happy
>> Just like you make your fans happy, Scrotumlicker
>>
>
>You can watch dogs ---- in the park for free every day, live and
>everything, only a lonely retard would take advantage of the opportunity.

That has got to be the dumbest argument I have heard since The Real
---- Cheney (a.k.a., the CL imitator, a.k.a., Chicklet) posted here.
You seem to imply that if it is free it is not worth watching. If
stern would give his show away for free or for a nominal fee, maybe to
connect to his audience again, would it still be worth watching?

Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com

SapperPest19

March 20th, 2006, 03:30 PM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:04:39 GMT, Tim Donohoe <tdonohoe@aol.com>
wrote:

>Buzzer wrote:
>
>> johnnyxgriswold@yahoo.com wrote in news:1142871478.923213.35440
>> @z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>
>>>I'm a huge O&A fan and I would NEVER pay for them OnDemand. Stern
>>>wants to milk any and all of his sheepish fans and I can't believe you
>>>can't see right through that. Suckers.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> You have to remember back in the day when you were a fan and you belived.
>> You watched private parts and belived that Stern was the underdog, and you
>> belived he cared about his fans, and you belived that he fought the power
>> of management to bring this sort of show to the people for the people.
>>
>> What we thought was fact turned out to be nothing more than a fictional
>> story. They are still under the belief that Private parts is fact and not
>> fiction.
>>
>
>By "we" you mean emptyheaded simpletons like you who listen to a radio
>show expecting the truth. It is understandable why you get so obsessed,
>but most people don't listen to Howard as a path to enlightenment.

That's right....they listen to stern's show because it is
revolutionary!!!!

Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com

The Central Scrotinizer

March 20th, 2006, 03:59 PM

In article <bcau12p2qmo91554mg5hh5jlgjvkstoi4r@4ax.com>,
SapperPest19 <bob@lahhtf.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:09:52 GMT, Tim Donohoe <tdonohoe@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> >The Cunning Linguist :Þ- Cmdr. Usenet OperAtions wrote:
> >
> >> "The Central Scrotinizer" <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote in message
> >> news:mudshark-20475F.22561219032006@news.giganews.com...
> >>
> >>>In article <1142828960.314478.49740@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
> >>> "Jack Wills" <wills.jack@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>SapperPest19 wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>http://www.howardstern.com/flt/ht/704.html
> >>>>
> >>>>Which is better - Howard Stern On Demand or Ope and Anthony On Demand?
> >>>
> >>>I've never seen Ape and Othany on OnDemand, but I saw Jeff Won't Leave,
> >>
> >>
> >> Ape and Othany! Ha ha ha ha ha! That's hilarious
> >> What's an othany?
> >>
> >>
> >>>which is high-larious, and the Savanah Samson on the sybian. Great
> >>>stuff. Are O&A on OnDemand?
> >>
> >>
> >> You can watch the show live, every day, for free. Unlike greedy Hoohoo the
> >> Jew, O&A do things just to make the fans happy
> >> Just like you make your fans happy, Scrotumlicker
> >>
> >
> >You can watch dogs ---- in the park for free every day, live and
> >everything, only a lonely retard would take advantage of the opportunity.
>
> That has got to be the dumbest argument I have heard since The Real
> ---- Cheney (a.k.a., the CL imitator, a.k.a., Chicklet) posted here.
> You seem to imply that if it is free it is not worth watching. If
> stern would give his show away for free or for a nominal fee, maybe to
> connect to his audience again, would it still be worth watching?
>
> Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.usenet.com

No, he was implying that the O&A show sucks. You army pests are sharp as
marbles...

--
The Central Scrotinizer

SapperPest19

March 20th, 2006, 03:59 PM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:44:46 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
<mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:

>In article <bcau12p2qmo91554mg5hh5jlgjvkstoi4r@4ax.com>,
> SapperPest19 <bob@lahhtf.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:09:52 GMT, Tim Donohoe <tdonohoe@aol.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >The Cunning Linguist :Þ- Cmdr. Usenet OperAtions wrote:
>> >
>> >> "The Central Scrotinizer" <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:mudshark-20475F.22561219032006@news.giganews.com...
>> >>
>> >>>In article <1142828960.314478.49740@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
>> >>> "Jack Wills" <wills.jack@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>SapperPest19 wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>http://www.howardstern.com/flt/ht/704.html
>> >>>>
>> >>>>Which is better - Howard Stern On Demand or Ope and Anthony On Demand?
>> >>>
>> >>>I've never seen Ape and Othany on OnDemand, but I saw Jeff Won't Leave,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Ape and Othany! Ha ha ha ha ha! That's hilarious
>> >> What's an othany?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>which is high-larious, and the Savanah Samson on the sybian. Great
>> >>>stuff. Are O&A on OnDemand?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> You can watch the show live, every day, for free. Unlike greedy Hoohoo the
>> >> Jew, O&A do things just to make the fans happy
>> >> Just like you make your fans happy, Scrotumlicker
>> >>
>> >
>> >You can watch dogs ---- in the park for free every day, live and
>> >everything, only a lonely retard would take advantage of the opportunity.
>>
>> That has got to be the dumbest argument I have heard since The Real
>> ---- Cheney (a.k.a., the CL imitator, a.k.a., Chicklet) posted here.
>> You seem to imply that if it is free it is not worth watching. If
>> stern would give his show away for free or for a nominal fee, maybe to
>> connect to his audience again, would it still be worth watching?
>>
>> Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> http://www.usenet.com
>
>No, he was implying that the O&A show sucks. You army pests are sharp as
>marbles...

I know what he was trying to imply.

Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com

Tim Donohoe

March 20th, 2006, 04:30 PM

SapperPest19 wrote:

>>>
>>>You can watch the show live, every day, for free. Unlike greedy Hoohoo the
>>>Jew, O&A do things just to make the fans happy
>>>Just like you make your fans happy, Scrotumlicker
>>>
>>
>>You can watch dogs ---- in the park for free every day, live and
>>everything, only a lonely retard would take advantage of the opportunity.
>
>
> That has got to be the dumbest argument I have heard since The Real
> ---- Cheney (a.k.a., the CL imitator, a.k.a., Chicklet) posted here.

Until this one of yours of course.

> You seem to imply that if it is free it is not worth watching.

I implied no such thing. I made a simple comparison of things you can
watch for free. I was responding to a lonely retard who probably
understands the analogy.

> If
> stern would give his show away for free or for a nominal fee, maybe to
> connect to his audience again, would it still be worth watching?
>

More nonsense, I am pretty sure you understand logic so I will take this
twisted argument of yours to mean that you concede

Tim Donohoe

March 20th, 2006, 04:30 PM

SapperPest19 wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:04:39 GMT, Tim Donohoe <tdonohoe@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>Buzzer wrote:
>>
>>
>>>johnnyxgriswold@yahoo.com wrote in news:1142871478.923213.35440
>>>@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I'm a huge O&A fan and I would NEVER pay for them OnDemand. Stern
>>>>wants to milk any and all of his sheepish fans and I can't believe you
>>>>can't see right through that. Suckers.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>You have to remember back in the day when you were a fan and you belived.
>>>You watched private parts and belived that Stern was the underdog, and you
>>>belived he cared about his fans, and you belived that he fought the power
>>>of management to bring this sort of show to the people for the people.
>>>
>>>What we thought was fact turned out to be nothing more than a fictional
>>>story. They are still under the belief that Private parts is fact and not
>>>fiction.
>>>
>>
>>By "we" you mean emptyheaded simpletons like you who listen to a radio
>>show expecting the truth. It is understandable why you get so obsessed,
>>but most people don't listen to Howard as a path to enlightenment.
>
>
> That's right....they listen to stern's show because it is
> revolutionary!!!!
>

Most people listen because they find it funny. Just because you are
obsessed with radio shows doesn't mean everyone is.

Ricky Ticket

March 20th, 2006, 05:59 PM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:16:39 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
(in message <mudshark-2C6881.11163920032006@news.giganews.com>):

>> You provide plenty of nothing.
>
> Which is why you reply to my every post.

CLONE! :D

--
"I'm totally with Boom and though I wouldn't invite him to Sunday dinner at
my church, he ended up proving everything he said and all you guys who didn't
like what he said could do is make up stuff in retaliation."
--django12x@aol.com (AKA Boom)

Jack Wills

March 20th, 2006, 06:30 PM

Ricky Ticket wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:16:39 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
> (in message <mudshark-2C6881.11163920032006@news.giganews.com>):
>
> >> You provide plenty of nothing.
> >
> > Which is why you reply to my every post.
>
> CLONE! :D

Looks like you got a new theme going, you one-trick-at-a-time pony!

SapperPest19

March 20th, 2006, 07:30 PM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:03:53 GMT, Tim Donohoe <tdonohoe@aol.com>
wrote:

>SapperPest19 wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>>You can watch the show live, every day, for free. Unlike greedy Hoohoo the
>>>>Jew, O&A do things just to make the fans happy
>>>>Just like you make your fans happy, Scrotumlicker
>>>>
>>>
>>>You can watch dogs ---- in the park for free every day, live and
>>>everything, only a lonely retard would take advantage of the opportunity.
>>
>>
>> That has got to be the dumbest argument I have heard since The Real
>> ---- Cheney (a.k.a., the CL imitator, a.k.a., Chicklet) posted here.
>
>Until this one of yours of course.

Oooohhhhhh....you got me here.

>> You seem to imply that if it is free it is not worth watching.
>
>I implied no such thing. I made a simple comparison of things you can
>watch for free. I was responding to a lonely retard who probably
>understands the analogy.

I guess you can relate to your own kind.

>> If
>> stern would give his show away for free or for a nominal fee, maybe to
>> connect to his audience again, would it still be worth watching?
>>
>
>More nonsense, I am pretty sure you understand logic so I will take this
>twisted argument of yours to mean that you concede

Take it however you want it, jew lover. But you may want to take you
head out of stern's ass every now and then to get a breath of fresh
air.

SapperPest19

March 20th, 2006, 07:30 PM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:05:38 GMT, Tim Donohoe <tdonohoe@aol.com>
wrote:

>SapperPest19 wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:04:39 GMT, Tim Donohoe <tdonohoe@aol.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Buzzer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>johnnyxgriswold@yahoo.com wrote in news:1142871478.923213.35440
>>>>@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I'm a huge O&A fan and I would NEVER pay for them OnDemand. Stern
>>>>>wants to milk any and all of his sheepish fans and I can't believe you
>>>>>can't see right through that. Suckers.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You have to remember back in the day when you were a fan and you belived.
>>>>You watched private parts and belived that Stern was the underdog, and you
>>>>belived he cared about his fans, and you belived that he fought the power
>>>>of management to bring this sort of show to the people for the people.
>>>>
>>>>What we thought was fact turned out to be nothing more than a fictional
>>>>story. They are still under the belief that Private parts is fact and not
>>>>fiction.
>>>>
>>>
>>>By "we" you mean emptyheaded simpletons like you who listen to a radio
>>>show expecting the truth. It is understandable why you get so obsessed,
>>>but most people don't listen to Howard as a path to enlightenment.
>>
>>
>> That's right....they listen to stern's show because it is
>> revolutionary!!!!
>>
>
>Most people listen because they find it funny. Just because you are
>obsessed with radio shows doesn't mean everyone is.

Please don't say I am obsessed again. If you say it twice, you force
it to be true.

Tim Donohoe

March 20th, 2006, 07:59 PM

SapperPest19 wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:03:53 GMT, Tim Donohoe <tdonohoe@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>SapperPest19 wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>You can watch the show live, every day, for free. Unlike greedy Hoohoo the
>>>>>Jew, O&A do things just to make the fans happy
>>>>>Just like you make your fans happy, Scrotumlicker
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You can watch dogs ---- in the park for free every day, live and
>>>>everything, only a lonely retard would take advantage of the opportunity.
>>>
>>>
>>>That has got to be the dumbest argument I have heard since The Real
>>>---- Cheney (a.k.a., the CL imitator, a.k.a., Chicklet) posted here.
>>
>>Until this one of yours of course.
>
>
> Oooohhhhhh....you got me here.
>
>
>>>You seem to imply that if it is free it is not worth watching.
>>
>>I implied no such thing. I made a simple comparison of things you can
>>watch for free. I was responding to a lonely retard who probably
>>understands the analogy.
>
>
> I guess you can relate to your own kind.
>
>
>>>If
>>>stern would give his show away for free or for a nominal fee, maybe to
>>>connect to his audience again, would it still be worth watching?
>>>
>>
>>More nonsense, I am pretty sure you understand logic so I will take this
>>twisted argument of yours to mean that you concede
>
>
> Take it however you want it, jew lover. But you may want to take you
> head out of stern's ass every now and then to get a breath of fresh
> air.

Coming from an emptyheaded vessel for illogical clone arguments this
makes me chuckle. Are you a slow witted bigot or did your clone show
tell you to dislike jews?

Boom

March 20th, 2006, 08:30 PM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:13:16 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:

>>More nonsense, I am pretty sure you understand logic so I will take this
>>twisted argument of yours to mean that you concede
>
>Take it however you want it, jew lover. But you may want to take you
>head out of stern's ass every now and then to get a breath of fresh
>air.

Jew lover? Wow, nice to know you're an anti-semite. Are you in the
US Armed Forces or the Hitler Youth?

SapperPest19

March 20th, 2006, 09:30 PM

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 03:05:56 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:13:16 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
>
>>>More nonsense, I am pretty sure you understand logic so I will take this
>>>twisted argument of yours to mean that you concede
>>
>>Take it however you want it, jew lover. But you may want to take you
>>head out of stern's ass every now and then to get a breath of fresh
>>air.
>
>Jew lover? Wow, nice to know you're an anti-semite. Are you in the
>US Armed Forces or the Hitler Youth?

Get over yourselves. Howard is a jew, is he not?

SapperPest19

March 20th, 2006, 09:30 PM

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 02:42:22 GMT, Tim Donohoe <tdonohoe@aol.com>
wrote:

>SapperPest19 wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:03:53 GMT, Tim Donohoe <tdonohoe@aol.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>SapperPest19 wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>You can watch the show live, every day, for free. Unlike greedy Hoohoo the
>>>>>>Jew, O&A do things just to make the fans happy
>>>>>>Just like you make your fans happy, Scrotumlicker
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>You can watch dogs ---- in the park for free every day, live and
>>>>>everything, only a lonely retard would take advantage of the opportunity.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>That has got to be the dumbest argument I have heard since The Real
>>>>---- Cheney (a.k.a., the CL imitator, a.k.a., Chicklet) posted here.
>>>
>>>Until this one of yours of course.
>>
>>
>> Oooohhhhhh....you got me here.
>>
>>
>>>>You seem to imply that if it is free it is not worth watching.
>>>
>>>I implied no such thing. I made a simple comparison of things you can
>>>watch for free. I was responding to a lonely retard who probably
>>>understands the analogy.
>>
>>
>> I guess you can relate to your own kind.
>>
>>
>>>>If
>>>>stern would give his show away for free or for a nominal fee, maybe to
>>>>connect to his audience again, would it still be worth watching?
>>>>
>>>
>>>More nonsense, I am pretty sure you understand logic so I will take this
>>>twisted argument of yours to mean that you concede
>>
>>
>> Take it however you want it, jew lover. But you may want to take you
>> head out of stern's ass every now and then to get a breath of fresh
>> air.
>
>Coming from an emptyheaded vessel for illogical clone arguments this
>makes me chuckle. Are you a slow witted bigot or did your clone show
>tell you to dislike jews?

Funny, you call it clone arguements. Another of your herd says we
should decide on a point.

And to answer your questions: no and no.

Boom

March 20th, 2006, 09:30 PM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:00:38 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 03:05:56 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:13:16 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>More nonsense, I am pretty sure you understand logic so I will take this
>>>>twisted argument of yours to mean that you concede
>>>
>>>Take it however you want it, jew lover. But you may want to take you
>>>head out of stern's ass every now and then to get a breath of fresh
>>>air.
>>
>>Jew lover? Wow, nice to know you're an anti-semite. Are you in the
>>US Armed Forces or the Hitler Youth?
>
>Get over yourselves. Howard is a jew, is he not?

Yes he is. Not sure what it has to do with the topic of Howard
Stern's revolution, but OK.

SapperPest19

March 20th, 2006, 09:59 PM

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 04:09:48 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:00:38 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 03:05:56 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:13:16 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>More nonsense, I am pretty sure you understand logic so I will take this
>>>>>twisted argument of yours to mean that you concede
>>>>
>>>>Take it however you want it, jew lover. But you may want to take you
>>>>head out of stern's ass every now and then to get a breath of fresh
>>>>air.
>>>
>>>Jew lover? Wow, nice to know you're an anti-semite. Are you in the
>>>US Armed Forces or the Hitler Youth?
>>
>>Get over yourselves. Howard is a jew, is he not?
>
>Yes he is. Not sure what it has to do with the topic of Howard
>Stern's revolution, but OK.

Ok....for the slow people. Tim loves howard stern and walks the party
line. Howard is a jew. Therefore, Tim is a jew-lover. That was not
really tough. I expected more from you boom.

Boom

March 20th, 2006, 09:59 PM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:45:54 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 04:09:48 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:00:38 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 03:05:56 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:13:16 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>More nonsense, I am pretty sure you understand logic so I will take this
>>>>>>twisted argument of yours to mean that you concede
>>>>>
>>>>>Take it however you want it, jew lover. But you may want to take you
>>>>>head out of stern's ass every now and then to get a breath of fresh
>>>>>air.
>>>>
>>>>Jew lover? Wow, nice to know you're an anti-semite. Are you in the
>>>>US Armed Forces or the Hitler Youth?
>>>
>>>Get over yourselves. Howard is a jew, is he not?
>>
>>Yes he is. Not sure what it has to do with the topic of Howard
>>Stern's revolution, but OK.
>
>Ok....for the slow people. Tim loves howard stern and walks the party
>line. Howard is a jew. Therefore, Tim is a jew-lover. That was not
>really tough. I expected more from you boom.

Leslie Moonves is also a Jew. His uncle is David Ben Gurion, the
founder of Israel. Most Stern fans hate Leslie Moonves. So Tim is a
Howard lover, not a Jew lover. I expected more from YOU.

Tim Donohoe

March 20th, 2006, 10:33 PM

SapperPest19 wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 04:09:48 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:
>
>
>>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:00:38 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 03:05:56 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:13:16 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>More nonsense, I am pretty sure you understand logic so I will take this
>>>>>>twisted argument of yours to mean that you concede
>>>>>
>>>>>Take it however you want it, jew lover. But you may want to take you
>>>>>head out of stern's ass every now and then to get a breath of fresh
>>>>>air.
>>>>
>>>>Jew lover? Wow, nice to know you're an anti-semite. Are you in the
>>>>US Armed Forces or the Hitler Youth?
>>>
>>>Get over yourselves. Howard is a jew, is he not?
>>
>>Yes he is. Not sure what it has to do with the topic of Howard
>>Stern's revolution, but OK.
>
>
> Ok....for the slow people. Tim loves howard stern and walks the party
> line. Howard is a jew. Therefore, Tim is a jew-lover. That was not
> really tough. I expected more from you boom.

The sensible interpretation of your comment is that you are either a
hillbilly bigot or regurgitating something someone else told you. You
are wrong about every other assumption you make. Maybe you should find
some of those slow people you are talking about and work with them to
try and join civilized society.

SapperPest19

March 21st, 2006, 05:00 AM

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 04:58:02 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:45:54 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 04:09:48 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:00:38 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 03:05:56 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:13:16 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>More nonsense, I am pretty sure you understand logic so I will take this
>>>>>>>twisted argument of yours to mean that you concede
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Take it however you want it, jew lover. But you may want to take you
>>>>>>head out of stern's ass every now and then to get a breath of fresh
>>>>>>air.
>>>>>
>>>>>Jew lover? Wow, nice to know you're an anti-semite. Are you in the
>>>>>US Armed Forces or the Hitler Youth?
>>>>
>>>>Get over yourselves. Howard is a jew, is he not?
>>>
>>>Yes he is. Not sure what it has to do with the topic of Howard
>>>Stern's revolution, but OK.
>>
>>Ok....for the slow people. Tim loves howard stern and walks the party
>>line. Howard is a jew. Therefore, Tim is a jew-lover. That was not
>>really tough. I expected more from you boom.
>
>Leslie Moonves is also a Jew. His uncle is David Ben Gurion, the
>founder of Israel. Most Stern fans hate Leslie Moonves. So Tim is a
>Howard lover, not a Jew lover. I expected more from YOU.

<rolls eyes> I am going to assume you are a guy who has a wife or a
girlfriend whom you care about. I will assume you love them. You are a
woman-lover. You might not love them all, but you love one. You are
letting me down boom.

SapperPest19

March 21st, 2006, 05:00 AM

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 05:04:47 GMT, Tim Donohoe <tdonohoe@aol.com>
wrote:

>SapperPest19 wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 04:09:48 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:00:38 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 03:05:56 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:13:16 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>More nonsense, I am pretty sure you understand logic so I will take this
>>>>>>>twisted argument of yours to mean that you concede
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Take it however you want it, jew lover. But you may want to take you
>>>>>>head out of stern's ass every now and then to get a breath of fresh
>>>>>>air.
>>>>>
>>>>>Jew lover? Wow, nice to know you're an anti-semite. Are you in the
>>>>>US Armed Forces or the Hitler Youth?
>>>>
>>>>Get over yourselves. Howard is a jew, is he not?
>>>
>>>Yes he is. Not sure what it has to do with the topic of Howard
>>>Stern's revolution, but OK.
>>
>>
>> Ok....for the slow people. Tim loves howard stern and walks the party
>> line. Howard is a jew. Therefore, Tim is a jew-lover. That was not
>> really tough. I expected more from you boom.
>
>The sensible interpretation of your comment is that you are either a
>hillbilly bigot or regurgitating something someone else told you. You
>are wrong about every other assumption you make.

You really should not read someing that is not there.

>Maybe you should find
>some of those slow people you are talking about and work with them to
>try and join civilized society.

I'm not interested in working with you.

Ricky Ticket

March 21st, 2006, 03:59 PM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:30:51 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
(in message <mudshark-D2DB03.09305120032006@news.giganews.com>):

>> It's all about Alison.
>> His whole career ended up being a lie.
>
> So you've never had a change of heart about something that at one time
> you were very passionate about?

That's one way to put it, another way is Stern's lies are so easy to read
that you could see the desperation in his "I have a great marriage"
proclamations EVERY time he used his "great marriage" to bash people that got
divorced. :o)

Private Parts is an embarrassment to him and nothing more then a VERY
transparent attempt by him to shout down the voices in his head saying "They
are all going to laugh at you". :D

It exemplifies his delusional substitution of reality with shilling. :D

--
"Yeah, I overreacted a little to someone blabbing my wife and parents' name
all over the internet." --Boom (explaining his most recent meltdown)

Hoody

March 21st, 2006, 05:59 PM

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:58:22 GMT, Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:30:51 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
>(in message <mudshark-D2DB03.09305120032006@news.giganews.com>):
>
>>> It's all about Alison.
>>> His whole career ended up being a lie.
>>
>> So you've never had a change of heart about something that at one time
>> you were very passionate about?
>
>That's one way to put it, another way is Stern's lies are so easy to read
>that you could see the desperation in his "I have a great marriage"
>proclamations EVERY time he used his "great marriage" to bash people that got
>divorced. :o)

Just like he BASHED people with nosejobs when he got a nosejob
himself.

Just like he BASHED celebrity parents for not caring about their kids
when his was getting an ecstasy stomach pumping.

Just liked he BASHED the FCC for censoring people based on their own
personal viewes when he was placing a gag order on two DJ who made fun
of him.

Boom

March 21st, 2006, 08:00 PM

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:52:13 -0500, Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:58:22 GMT, Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:30:51 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
>>(in message <mudshark-D2DB03.09305120032006@news.giganews.com>):
>>
>>>> It's all about Alison.
>>>> His whole career ended up being a lie.
>>>
>>> So you've never had a change of heart about something that at one time
>>> you were very passionate about?
>>
>>That's one way to put it, another way is Stern's lies are so easy to read
>>that you could see the desperation in his "I have a great marriage"
>>proclamations EVERY time he used his "great marriage" to bash people that got
>>divorced. :o)
>
>Just like he BASHED people with nosejobs when he got a nosejob
>himself.

Only people with bad nosejobs.

>Just like he BASHED celebrity parents for not caring about their kids
>when his was getting an ecstasy stomach pumping.

Total rumor based on nothing except O&A's extreme jealousy.

>Just liked he BASHED the FCC for censoring people based on their own
>personal viewes when he was placing a gag order on two DJ who made fun
>of him.

Howard wins, O&A lose. Tough ----. Deal with it.

Hoody

March 21st, 2006, 08:30 PM

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 02:52:17 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:

>>Just like he BASHED people with nosejobs when he got a nosejob
>>himself.
>
>Only people with bad nosejobs.

His was obvious. His denial was even moreso.
>
>>Just like he BASHED celebrity parents for not caring about their kids
>>when his was getting an ecstasy stomach pumping.
>
>Total rumor based on nothing except O&A's extreme jealousy.

Deny deny deny.

>>Just liked he BASHED the FCC for censoring people based on their own
>>personal viewes when he was placing a gag order on two DJ who made fun
>>of him.
>
>Howard wins, O&A lose. Tough ----. Deal with it.

Not really a response to this most extreme of his hypocrisy. He
ADMITTED he's a hypocrite. What did he win ? He's on the #2
satellite company and he's getting sued. Nice win.

The Central Scrotinizer

March 21st, 2006, 08:30 PM

In article <0001HW.C045EF4F000040A2215FECC0@news.east.earthlink.net>,
Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:30:51 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
> (in message <mudshark-D2DB03.09305120032006@news.giganews.com>):
>
> >> It's all about Alison.
> >> His whole career ended up being a lie.
> >
> > So you've never had a change of heart about something that at one time
> > you were very passionate about?
>
> That's one way to put it, another way is Stern's lies are so easy to read
> that you could see the desperation in his "I have a great marriage"
> proclamations EVERY time he used his "great marriage" to bash people that got
> divorced. :o)
>
> Private Parts is an embarrassment to him and nothing more then a VERY
> transparent attempt by him to shout down the voices in his head saying "They
> are all going to laugh at you". :D
>
> It exemplifies his delusional substitution of reality with shilling. :D

Someone needs a hug.

--
The Central Scrotinizer

The Central Scrotinizer

March 21st, 2006, 08:30 PM

In article <8q7122t1o16g6cov900snpl76v2rop580n@fe03.buzzardnews.com>,
Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:58:22 GMT, Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:30:51 -0500, The Central Scrotinizer wrote
> >(in message <mudshark-D2DB03.09305120032006@news.giganews.com>):
> >
> >>> It's all about Alison.
> >>> His whole career ended up being a lie.
> >>
> >> So you've never had a change of heart about something that at one time
> >> you were very passionate about?
> >
> >That's one way to put it, another way is Stern's lies are so easy to read
> >that you could see the desperation in his "I have a great marriage"
> >proclamations EVERY time he used his "great marriage" to bash people that
> >got
> >divorced. :o)
>
> Just like he BASHED people with nosejobs when he got a nosejob
> himself.
>
> Just like he BASHED celebrity parents for not caring about their kids
> when his was getting an ecstasy stomach pumping.
>
> Just liked he BASHED the FCC for censoring people based on their own
> personal viewes when he was placing a gag order on two DJ who made fun
> of him.

Aw, are you that kid that was getting an ecstasy stomach pumping?

I never heard the story of his daughter. What happened?

--
The Central Scrotinizer

Hoody

March 21st, 2006, 08:59 PM

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:20:42 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
<mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:

>I never heard the story of his daughter. What happened?

You mean Howie doesn't share EVERYTHING with his audience ?
It's a good one.

The Central Scrotinizer

March 21st, 2006, 09:31 PM

In article <r6i122tbvvrh2h79a5l5s1kkjnojkfsjau@fe03.buzzardnews.com>,
Hoody <hoody@email.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:20:42 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
>
> >I never heard the story of his daughter. What happened?
>
> You mean Howie doesn't share EVERYTHING with his audience ?
> It's a good one.

I bet it is... Just post a link. Anything happens to a celeb, especially
a kid, it's all over the news...

--
The Central Scrotinizer

Ricky Ticket

March 22nd, 2006, 01:35 AM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:00:38 -0500, SapperPest19 wrote
(in message <aiuu12phgeeh39jclq9cgc47glp778a27t@4ax.com>):

> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 03:05:56 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:13:16 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> More nonsense, I am pretty sure you understand logic so I will take this
>>>> twisted argument of yours to mean that you concede
>>>
>>> Take it however you want it, jew lover. But you may want to take you
>>> head out of stern's ass every now and then to get a breath of fresh
>>> air.
>>
>> Jew lover? Wow, nice to know you're an anti-semite. Are you in the
>> US Armed Forces or the Hitler Youth?
>
> Get over yourselves. Howard is a jew, is he not?

But what does that have to do with the anti Semite that just fell out of your
ass Sapper? :/

--
"I'm totally with Boom and though I wouldn't invite him to Sunday dinner at
my church, he ended up proving everything he said and all you guys who didn't
like what he said could do is make up stuff in retaliation."
--django12x@aol.com (AKA Boom)

Ricky Ticket

March 22nd, 2006, 01:35 AM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:45:54 -0500, SapperPest19 wrote
(in message <151v121ukrf9p13cfmtnunegf6a8mcji69@4ax.com>):

> From: SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.fan.howard-stern, alt.fan.opie-and-anthony,
> alt.radio.satellite
>
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 04:09:48 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:00:38 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 03:05:56 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:13:16 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> More nonsense, I am pretty sure you understand logic so I will take
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> twisted argument of yours to mean that you concede
>>>>>
>>>>> Take it however you want it, jew lover. But you may want to take you
>>>>> head out of stern's ass every now and then to get a breath of fresh
>>>>> air.
>>>>
>>>> Jew lover? Wow, nice to know you're an anti-semite. Are you in the
>>>> US Armed Forces or the Hitler Youth?
>>>
>>> Get over yourselves. Howard is a jew, is he not?
>>
>> Yes he is. Not sure what it has to do with the topic of Howard
>> Stern's revolution, but OK.
>
> Ok....for the slow people. Tim loves howard stern and walks the party
> line. Howard is a jew. Therefore, Tim is a jew-lover. That was not
> really tough. I expected more from you boom.

Nice backpeddle dip----. Why use the tern "Jew lover" as if it's a negative
and has anything to do with a persons like or dislike of Howard Stern? Are
you really this fucking stupid?

--
"I'm totally with Boom and though I wouldn't invite him to Sunday dinner at
my church, he ended up proving everything he said and all you guys who didn't
like what he said could do is make up stuff in retaliation."
--django12x@aol.com (AKA Boom)

Ricky Ticket

March 22nd, 2006, 01:35 AM

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 6:38:50 -0500, SapperPest19 wrote
(in message <m8pv12t86768bjcn17calmbbr3ph84fnrr@4ax.com>):

>>>>>>> Take it however you want it, jew lover. But you may want to take you
>>>>>>> head out of stern's ass every now and then to get a breath of fresh
>>>>>>> air.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jew lover? Wow, nice to know you're an anti-semite. Are you in the
>>>>>> US Armed Forces or the Hitler Youth?
>>>>>
>>>>> Get over yourselves. Howard is a jew, is he not?
>>>>
>>>> Yes he is. Not sure what it has to do with the topic of Howard
>>>> Stern's revolution, but OK.
>>>
>>> Ok....for the slow people. Tim loves howard stern and walks the party
>>> line. Howard is a jew. Therefore, Tim is a jew-lover. That was not
>>> really tough. I expected more from you boom.
>>
>> Leslie Moonves is also a Jew. His uncle is David Ben Gurion, the
>> founder of Israel. Most Stern fans hate Leslie Moonves. So Tim is a
>> Howard lover, not a Jew lover. I expected more from YOU.
>
> <rolls eyes> I am going to assume you are a guy who has a wife or a
> girlfriend whom you care about. I will assume you love them. You are a
> woman-lover. You might not love them all, but you love one. You are
> letting me down boom.

Not working Sapper, your anger got the best of you and a bigoted moron fell
out of you ass and ruined your credibility. Now you are on Sapper island all
alone. :o)

I thought retards like you were all dead, or hiding in argentina. :o)

--
"I'm totally with Boom and though I wouldn't invite him to Sunday dinner at
my church, he ended up proving everything he said and all you guys who didn't
like what he said could do is make up stuff in retaliation."
--django12x@aol.com (AKA Boom)

SapperPest19

March 22nd, 2006, 05:36 AM

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 08:30:38 GMT, Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 6:38:50 -0500, SapperPest19 wrote
>(in message <m8pv12t86768bjcn17calmbbr3ph84fnrr@4ax.com>):
>
>>>>>>>> Take it however you want it, jew lover. But you may want to take you
>>>>>>>> head out of stern's ass every now and then to get a breath of fresh
>>>>>>>> air.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jew lover? Wow, nice to know you're an anti-semite. Are you in the
>>>>>>> US Armed Forces or the Hitler Youth?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Get over yourselves. Howard is a jew, is he not?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes he is. Not sure what it has to do with the topic of Howard
>>>>> Stern's revolution, but OK.
>>>>
>>>> Ok....for the slow people. Tim loves howard stern and walks the party
>>>> line. Howard is a jew. Therefore, Tim is a jew-lover. That was not
>>>> really tough. I expected more from you boom.
>>>
>>> Leslie Moonves is also a Jew. His uncle is David Ben Gurion, the
>>> founder of Israel. Most Stern fans hate Leslie Moonves. So Tim is a
>>> Howard lover, not a Jew lover. I expected more from YOU.
>>
>> <rolls eyes> I am going to assume you are a guy who has a wife or a
>> girlfriend whom you care about. I will assume you love them. You are a
>> woman-lover. You might not love them all, but you love one. You are
>> letting me down boom.
>
>Not working Sapper, your anger got the best of you and a bigoted moron fell
>out of you ass and ruined your credibility. Now you are on Sapper island all
>alone. :o)
>
>I thought retards like you were all dead, or hiding in argentina. :o)

Cool. Thanks for posting. Everyone appreciates that you took the time
to post here.

SapperPest19

March 22nd, 2006, 05:36 AM

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 08:27:13 GMT, Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:45:54 -0500, SapperPest19 wrote
>(in message <151v121ukrf9p13cfmtnunegf6a8mcji69@4ax.com>):
>
>> From: SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com>
>> Newsgroups: alt.fan.howard-stern, alt.fan.opie-and-anthony,
>> alt.radio.satellite
>>
>> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 04:09:48 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:00:38 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 03:05:56 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:13:16 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> More nonsense, I am pretty sure you understand logic so I will take
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> twisted argument of yours to mean that you concede
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Take it however you want it, jew lover. But you may want to take you
>>>>>> head out of stern's ass every now and then to get a breath of fresh
>>>>>> air.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jew lover? Wow, nice to know you're an anti-semite. Are you in the
>>>>> US Armed Forces or the Hitler Youth?
>>>>
>>>> Get over yourselves. Howard is a jew, is he not?
>>>
>>> Yes he is. Not sure what it has to do with the topic of Howard
>>> Stern's revolution, but OK.
>>
>> Ok....for the slow people. Tim loves howard stern and walks the party
>> line. Howard is a jew. Therefore, Tim is a jew-lover. That was not
>> really tough. I expected more from you boom.
>
>
>Nice backpeddle dip----. Why use the tern "Jew lover" as if it's a negative
>and has anything to do with a persons like or dislike of Howard Stern? Are
>you really this fucking stupid?

Cool. Thanks for posting. Everyone appreciates that you took the time
to post here.

SapperPest19

March 22nd, 2006, 05:36 AM

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 08:24:22 GMT, Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:00:38 -0500, SapperPest19 wrote
>(in message <aiuu12phgeeh39jclq9cgc47glp778a27t@4ax.com>):
>
>> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 03:05:56 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:13:16 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> More nonsense, I am pretty sure you understand logic so I will take this
>>>>> twisted argument of yours to mean that you concede
>>>>
>>>> Take it however you want it, jew lover. But you may want to take you
>>>> head out of stern's ass every now and then to get a breath of fresh
>>>> air.
>>>
>>> Jew lover? Wow, nice to know you're an anti-semite. Are you in the
>>> US Armed Forces or the Hitler Youth?
>>
>> Get over yourselves. Howard is a jew, is he not?
>
>But what does that have to do with the anti Semite that just fell out of your
>ass Sapper? :/

Cool. Thanks for posting. Everyone appreciates that you took the time
to post here.

lab~rat >:-)

March 22nd, 2006, 06:59 AM

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 06:20:03 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> puked:

>On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 08:30:38 GMT, Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 6:38:50 -0500, SapperPest19 wrote
>>(in message <m8pv12t86768bjcn17calmbbr3ph84fnrr@4ax.com>):
>>
>>>>>>>>> Take it however you want it, jew lover. But you may want to take you
>>>>>>>>> head out of stern's ass every now and then to get a breath of fresh
>>>>>>>>> air.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jew lover? Wow, nice to know you're an anti-semite. Are you in the
>>>>>>>> US Armed Forces or the Hitler Youth?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Get over yourselves. Howard is a jew, is he not?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes he is. Not sure what it has to do with the topic of Howard
>>>>>> Stern's revolution, but OK.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok....for the slow people. Tim loves howard stern and walks the party
>>>>> line. Howard is a jew. Therefore, Tim is a jew-lover. That was not
>>>>> really tough. I expected more from you boom.
>>>>
>>>> Leslie Moonves is also a Jew. His uncle is David Ben Gurion, the
>>>> founder of Israel. Most Stern fans hate Leslie Moonves. So Tim is a
>>>> Howard lover, not a Jew lover. I expected more from YOU.
>>>
>>> <rolls eyes> I am going to assume you are a guy who has a wife or a
>>> girlfriend whom you care about. I will assume you love them. You are a
>>> woman-lover. You might not love them all, but you love one. You are
>>> letting me down boom.
>>
>>Not working Sapper, your anger got the best of you and a bigoted moron fell
>>out of you ass and ruined your credibility. Now you are on Sapper island all
>>alone. :o)
>>
>>I thought retards like you were all dead, or hiding in argentina. :o)
>
>Cool. Thanks for posting. Everyone appreciates that you took the time
>to post here.

True. EEOC mandates that the retard contingent must be represented...
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

Ricky Ticket

March 22nd, 2006, 08:01 AM

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 7:20:03 -0500, SapperPest19 wrote
(in message <c6g2221pcth8nph1kut4uqjbovnrvo0vht@4ax.com>):

> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 08:30:38 GMT, Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 6:38:50 -0500, SapperPest19 wrote
>> (in message <m8pv12t86768bjcn17calmbbr3ph84fnrr@4ax.com>):
>>
>>>>>>>>> Take it however you want it, jew lover. But you may want to take you
>>>>>>>>> head out of stern's ass every now and then to get a breath of fresh
>>>>>>>>> air.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jew lover? Wow, nice to know you're an anti-semite. Are you in the
>>>>>>>> US Armed Forces or the Hitler Youth?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Get over yourselves. Howard is a jew, is he not?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes he is. Not sure what it has to do with the topic of Howard
>>>>>> Stern's revolution, but OK.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok....for the slow people. Tim loves howard stern and walks the party
>>>>> line. Howard is a jew. Therefore, Tim is a jew-lover. That was not
>>>>> really tough. I expected more from you boom.
>>>>
>>>> Leslie Moonves is also a Jew. His uncle is David Ben Gurion, the
>>>> founder of Israel. Most Stern fans hate Leslie Moonves. So Tim is a
>>>> Howard lover, not a Jew lover. I expected more from YOU.
>>>
>>> <rolls eyes> I am going to assume you are a guy who has a wife or a
>>> girlfriend whom you care about. I will assume you love them. You are a
>>> woman-lover. You might not love them all, but you love one. You are
>>> letting me down boom.
>>
>> Not working Sapper, your anger got the best of you and a bigoted moron
>> fell
>> out of you ass and ruined your credibility. Now you are on Sapper island
>> all
>> alone. :o)
>>
>> I thought retards like you were all dead, or hiding in argentina. :o)
>
> Cool. Thanks for posting. Everyone appreciates that you took the time
> to post here.

Seriously, what part of the world is still raising backwards ass anti-Semites
like you? :o)

Come to think of it, Cunning linguist is constantly ranting about ³The Jews².
Is this a ³Pest² thing, or are you one of his retarded socks? :D :o)

--
"Yeah, I overreacted a little to someone blabbing my wife and parents' name
all over the internet." --Boom (explaining his most recent meltdown)

SapperPest19

March 22nd, 2006, 10:30 AM

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:00:22 GMT, Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 7:20:03 -0500, SapperPest19 wrote
>(in message <c6g2221pcth8nph1kut4uqjbovnrvo0vht@4ax.com>):
>
>> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 08:30:38 GMT, Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 6:38:50 -0500, SapperPest19 wrote
>>> (in message <m8pv12t86768bjcn17calmbbr3ph84fnrr@4ax.com>):
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Take it however you want it, jew lover. But you may want to take you
>>>>>>>>>> head out of stern's ass every now and then to get a breath of fresh
>>>>>>>>>> air.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jew lover? Wow, nice to know you're an anti-semite. Are you in the
>>>>>>>>> US Armed Forces or the Hitler Youth?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Get over yourselves. Howard is a jew, is he not?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes he is. Not sure what it has to do with the topic of Howard
>>>>>>> Stern's revolution, but OK.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok....for the slow people. Tim loves howard stern and walks the party
>>>>>> line. Howard is a jew. Therefore, Tim is a jew-lover. That was not
>>>>>> really tough. I expected more from you boom.
>>>>>
>>>>> Leslie Moonves is also a Jew. His uncle is David Ben Gurion, the
>>>>> founder of Israel. Most Stern fans hate Leslie Moonves. So Tim is a
>>>>> Howard lover, not a Jew lover. I expected more from YOU.
>>>>
>>>> <rolls eyes> I am going to assume you are a guy who has a wife or a
>>>> girlfriend whom you care about. I will assume you love them. You are a
>>>> woman-lover. You might not love them all, but you love one. You are
>>>> letting me down boom.
>>>
>>> Not working Sapper, your anger got the best of you and a bigoted moron
>>> fell
>>> out of you ass and ruined your credibility. Now you are on Sapper island
>>> all
>>> alone. :o)
>>>
>>> I thought retards like you were all dead, or hiding in argentina. :o)
>>
>> Cool. Thanks for posting. Everyone appreciates that you took the time
>> to post here.
>
>Seriously, what part of the world is still raising backwards ass anti-Semites
>like you? :o)
>
>Come to think of it, Cunning linguist is constantly ranting about ³The Jews².
>Is this a ³Pest² thing, or are you one of his retarded socks? :D :o)

Cool. Thanks for posting. Everyone appreciates that you took the time
to post here.

Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com

March 22nd, 2006, 12:59 PM

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 02:52:17 +0000, Boom wrote:

>>Just like he BASHED celebrity parents for not caring about their kids
>>when his was getting an ecstasy stomach pumping.
>
> Total rumor based on nothing except O&A's extreme jealous

You're dumb even by Devo fan standards. If it was an untrue rumor, why
didn't he just deny it instead of freaking out to Mel about it?

Boom

March 22nd, 2006, 12:59 PM

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:44:10 GMT, KK <_KK_@furburger.net> wrote:

>On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 02:52:17 +0000, Boom wrote:
>
>>>Just like he BASHED celebrity parents for not caring about their kids
>>>when his was getting an ecstasy stomach pumping.
>>
>> Total rumor based on nothing except O&A's extreme jealous
>
>You're dumb even by Devo fan standards. If it was an untrue rumor, why
>didn't he just deny it instead of freaking out to Mel about it?

Freaking out to Mel? What the fuck can Mel do about it? They are on
different and warring companies.

You are now cut off. I refuse to get involved in any discussion with
you anymore. You are an idiot. This last post proves it.

March 22nd, 2006, 02:30 PM

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:51:14 +0000, Boom wrote:

>
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:44:10 GMT, KK <_KK_@furburger.net> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 02:52:17 +0000, Boom wrote:
>>
>>>>Just like he BASHED celebrity parents for not caring about their kids
>>>>when his was getting an ecstasy stomach pumping.
>>>
>>> Total rumor based on nothing except O&A's extreme jealous
>>
>>You're dumb even by Devo fan standards. If it was an untrue rumor, why
>>didn't he just deny it instead of freaking out to Mel about it?
>
> Freaking out to Mel? What the fuck can Mel do about it? They are on
> different and warring companies.

The event in question happened five years ago or so. Keep up, ----head.

> You are now cut off. I refuse to get involved in any discussion with
> you anymore. You are an idiot. This last post proves it.

Riiight, that post makes *me* look like an idiot, and not you.

Boom

March 22nd, 2006, 02:30 PM

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:12:37 GMT, KK <_KK_@furburger.net> wrote:

>On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:51:14 +0000, Boom wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:44:10 GMT, KK <_KK_@furburger.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 02:52:17 +0000, Boom wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Just like he BASHED celebrity parents for not caring about their kids
>>>>>when his was getting an ecstasy stomach pumping.
>>>>
>>>> Total rumor based on nothing except O&A's extreme jealous
>>>
>>>You're dumb even by Devo fan standards. If it was an untrue rumor, why
>>>didn't he just deny it instead of freaking out to Mel about it?
>>
>> Freaking out to Mel? What the fuck can Mel do about it? They are on
>> different and warring companies.
>
>The event in question happened five years ago or so. Keep up, ----head.

Ah, old news. Just like everything they talk about. Well since no
other media outlet in the country ever reported it, I figured this was
something new, but i should have known that if O&A were involved
there'd be no way it could be new.

>> You are now cut off. I refuse to get involved in any discussion with
>> you anymore. You are an idiot. This last post proves it.
>
>Riiight, that post makes *me* look like an idiot, and not you.

Glad you admit it. It's the first step toward accepting yourself,
obsessed fan.

Ricky Ticket

March 23rd, 2006, 12:59 AM

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:51:14 -0500, Boom wrote
(in message <sga3225nvf737nmmg3sambr5p8kk4hlbb8@4ax.com>):

> You are now cut off. I refuse to get involved in any discussion with
> you anymore.

Seen that before. :D

--
"Yeah, I overreacted a little to someone blabbing my wife and parents' name
all over the internet." --Boom (explaining his most recent meltdown)

The Cunning Linguist :Þ- Cmdr. Usenet OperAtions

March 28th, 2006, 07:59 AM

"The Central Scrotinizer" <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote in message
news:mudshark-11D4B8.08434020032006@news.giganews.com...
> In article <Xns978C73FFB38581@207.115.17.102>, Buzzer <none@email.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Once the subscription fees are increased and Stern eventually goes to a
> > premium channel, some of them will wake up and some will still be
hanging
> > on to that last thread of hope....
>
> According to Sapper, if Stern goes premium, he will be a success. Aren't
> the both of you a part of the pest army? If so, you might want to get on
> the same page, being in an army and all. Make you look even less
> credible than you already are.

They are Pests not mindless Borg-like Hoohoo fans. They can have differing
opinions

--
The Cunning Linguist :Þ- Commander, Usenet OperAtions

O&A always win in the end
Hoohoo always whines in the end

The Cunning Linguist :Þ- Cmdr. Usenet OperAtions

March 28th, 2006, 07:59 AM

"Hoody" <hoody@email.com> wrote in message
news:ooot12taf5h8hf8rde198he1ni8hqdmm88@fe05.buzzardnews.com...
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 08:43:40 -0800, The Central Scrotinizer
> <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote:
>
> >According to Sapper, if Stern goes premium, he will be a success. Aren't
> >the both of you a part of the pest army? If so, you might want to get on
> >the same page, being in an army and all. Make you look even less
> >credible than you already are.
>
> Right, the reason Howie is not on a premium channel is becuase they
> knew no one would subscribe.

Barely anyone subscribed to his free show

--
The Cunning Linguist :Þ- Commander, Usenet OperAtions

O&A always win in the end
Hoohoo always whines in the end

The Cunning Linguist :Þ- Cmdr. Usenet OperAtions

March 28th, 2006, 07:59 AM

"The Central Scrotinizer" <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote in message
news:mudshark-B5BC65.13150520032006@news.giganews.com...
> In article <vNETf.29712$ty4.26721@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com>,
> "The Cunning Linguist :Þ- Cmdr. Usenet OperAtions"
> <the_witchboy@yahooX.com> wrote:
>
>
> > What's an othany?
>
> It's the empty space between your ears.

AH HUH HUH HUH HUH HUH HUH HUH HUH!
Moron

--
The Cunning Linguist :Þ- Commander, Usenet OperAtions

O&A always win in the end
Hoohoo always whines in the end

The Cunning Linguist :Þ- Cmdr. Usenet OperAtions

March 28th, 2006, 07:59 AM

"The Central Scrotinizer" <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote in message
news:mudshark-7013B1.14444620032006@news.giganews.com...

> No, he was implying that the O&A show sucks. You army pests are sharp as
> marbles...

Like the ones you lost?

--
The Cunning Linguist :Þ- Commander, Usenet OperAtions

O&A always win in the end
Hoohoo always whines in the end

The Cunning Linguist :Þ- Cmdr. Usenet OperAtions

March 28th, 2006, 07:59 AM

"lab~rat >:-)" <chase@cheeze.net> wrote in message
news:ahk222d5dcv1gfrmla6carfdh4oeekr8pj@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 06:20:03 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> puked:

> >Cool. Thanks for posting. Everyone appreciates that you took the time
> >to post here.
>
> True. EEOC mandates that the retard contingent must be represented...

Well some other groups are missing a ---- load of theirs

--
The Cunning Linguist :Þ- Commander, Usenet OperAtions

O&A always win in the end
Hoohoo always whines in the end

lab~rat >:-)

March 28th, 2006, 08:31 AM

On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:54:02 GMT, "The Cunning Linguist :Ãž- Cmdr.
Usenet OperAtions" <the_witchboy@yahooX.com> puked:

>
>"lab~rat >:-)" <chase@cheeze.net> wrote in message
>news:ahk222d5dcv1gfrmla6carfdh4oeekr8pj@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 06:20:03 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> puked:
>
>> >Cool. Thanks for posting. Everyone appreciates that you took the time
>> >to post here.
>>
>> True. EEOC mandates that the retard contingent must be represented...
>
>Well some other groups are missing a ---- load of theirs

We can loan them Ricky...
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

lab~rat >:-)

March 28th, 2006, 08:31 AM

On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:53:55 GMT, "The Cunning Linguist :Ãž- Cmdr.
Usenet OperAtions" <the_witchboy@yahooX.com> puked:

>
>"The Central Scrotinizer" <mudshark@edgewater.com> wrote in message
>news:mudshark-11D4B8.08434020032006@news.giganews.com...
>> In article <Xns978C73FFB38581@207.115.17.102>, Buzzer <none@email.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Once the subscription fees are increased and Stern eventually goes to a
>> > premium channel, some of them will wake up and some will still be
>hanging
>> > on to that last thread of hope....
>>
>> According to Sapper, if Stern goes premium, he will be a success. Aren't
>> the both of you a part of the pest army? If so, you might want to get on
>> the same page, being in an army and all. Make you look even less
>> credible than you already are.
>
>They are Pests not mindless Borg-like Hoohoo fans. They can have differing
>opinions

The ones with the differing opinions must not c/p to the stern
group...
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

Ricky Ticket

March 28th, 2006, 10:30 AM

On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:06:55 -0500, lab~rat >:-) wrote
(in message <lvji22dmtd73cipd4oioruv1grm96ae4h6@4ax.com>):

> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:54:02 GMT, "The Cunning Linguist :Ãž- Cmdr.
> Usenet OperAtions" <the_witchboy@yahooX.com> puked:
>
>>
>> "lab~rat >:-)" <chase@cheeze.net> wrote in message
>> news:ahk222d5dcv1gfrmla6carfdh4oeekr8pj@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 06:20:03 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> puked:
>>
>>>> Cool. Thanks for posting. Everyone appreciates that you took the time
>>>> to post here.
>>>
>>> True. EEOC mandates that the retard contingent must be represented...
>>
>> Well some other groups are missing a ---- load of theirs
>
> We can loan them Ricky...
> --
> lab~rat >:-)
> Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

Ouch, +9 on the desperation meter Jr. :D

--
"Yeah, I overreacted a little to someone blabbing my wife and parents' name
all over the internet." --Boom (explaining his most recent meltdown)

lab~rat >:-)

March 28th, 2006, 10:59 AM

On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:18:04 GMT, Ricky Ticket <not@given.com> puked:

>On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:06:55 -0500, lab~rat >:-) wrote
>(in message <lvji22dmtd73cipd4oioruv1grm96ae4h6@4ax.com>):
>
>> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:54:02 GMT, "The Cunning Linguist :ÃƒÅ¾- Cmdr.
>> Usenet OperAtions" <the_witchboy@yahooX.com> puked:
>>
>>>
>>> "lab~rat >:-)" <chase@cheeze.net> wrote in message
>>> news:ahk222d5dcv1gfrmla6carfdh4oeekr8pj@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 06:20:03 -0600, SapperPest19 <bob@bob.com> puked:
>>>
>>>>> Cool. Thanks for posting. Everyone appreciates that you took the time
>>>>> to post here.
>>>>
>>>> True. EEOC mandates that the retard contingent must be represented...
>>>
>>> Well some other groups are missing a ---- load of theirs
>>
>> We can loan them Ricky...
>> --
>> lab~rat >:-)
>> Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
>
>Ouch, +9 on the desperation meter Jr. :D

I doubt that there's anyone desperate for retards. Don't mean to ruin
your hopes and whatnot...
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?