Re: Howie makes fun of JAY LENO's voice on old tapes ?!?!

[Les Moonves' Chicklet Teeth]

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:51:18 -0500, Hoody wrote:

> What about his voice without all of the effects he uses now !!!???

You know nothing about audio processing. You embarrass yourself
almost on a daily basis because you're clueless on the subject. Please
write about something on which you actually have some awareness. But more
than that, try this:

THINK BEFORE YOU WRITE, HOODY. Ask yourself, "Is ANYONE on earth actually
going to find this interesting, or will I be typing into a vacuum because
I've been plonked pretty consistently by nearly everybody?

Hoody, people don't have time to read boring crap about nothing. You're
the king of that. Why do you think you get so few responses? NOBODY
FUCKING CARES!!! Occasionally, you come up with something original that
isn't the Hoody "same ol', same ol'". That would be great if you could
pump out good stuff on a regular basis. But please......enough with
"Howard's voice is over-processed." My boy, you're completely clueless in
this area. You continually look like a dolt harping on your old,
data-lacking topic. NOBODY FUCKING CARES!!!

[johnnyxgriswold@yahoo.com]

this post makes YOU seem like a mental patient.

[Les Moonves' Chicklet Teeth]

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:51:43 -0800, johnnyxgriswold wrote:

> this post makes YOU seem like a mental patient.

That's fine, Sparky. Please elaborate and cite specifics. Inarticulate
postings such as yours waste everybody's time.....yes, even yours.

[Hoody]

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:29:55 -0800, Les Moonves' Chicklet Teeth
<I_lost_my_caps_in_Julie_Chen's_twat@cbs.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:51:18 -0500, Hoody wrote:
>
>> What about his voice without all of the effects he uses now !!!???
>
>You know nothing about audio processing. You embarrass yourself
>almost on a daily basis because you're clueless on the subject. Please
>write about something on which you actually have some awareness. But more
>than that, try this:

But you never explained it to me !!!
>
>THINK BEFORE YOU WRITE, HOODY. Ask yourself, "Is ANYONE on earth actually
>going to find this interesting, or will I be typing into a vacuum because
>I've been plonked pretty consistently by nearly everybody?

Take your own advice.

>Hoody, people don't have time to read boring crap about nothing.

I do it all for you.

>the king of that. Why do you think you get so few responses? NOBODY
>FUCKING CARES!!! Occasionally, you come up with something original that
>isn't the Hoody "same ol', same ol'".

The "same ol" is your beloved Howie,

>. But please......enough with
>"Howard's voice is over-processed." My boy, you're completely clueless in
>this area. You continually look like a dolt harping on your old,
>data-lacking topic. NOBODY FUCKING CARES!!!

Does the truth hurt THAT much ?

[Les Moonves' Chicklet Teeth]

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 18:04:52 -0500, Hoody wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:29:55 -0800, Les Moonves' Chicklet Teeth
> <I_lost_my_caps_in_Julie_Chen's_twat@cbs.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:51:18 -0500, Hoody wrote:
>>
>>> What about his voice without all of the effects he uses now !!!???
>>
>>You know nothing about audio processing. You embarrass yourself
>>almost on a daily basis because you're clueless on the subject. Please
>>write about something on which you actually have some awareness. But more
>>than that, try this:
>
> But you never explained it to me !!!
>>
>>THINK BEFORE YOU WRITE, HOODY. Ask yourself, "Is ANYONE on earth actually
>>going to find this interesting, or will I be typing into a vacuum because
>>I've been plonked pretty consistently by nearly everybody?
>
> Take your own advice.
>
>>Hoody, people don't have time to read boring crap about nothing.
>
> I do it all for you.
>
>>the king of that. Why do you think you get so few responses? NOBODY
>>FUCKING CARES!!! Occasionally, you come up with something original that
>>isn't the Hoody "same ol', same ol'".
>
> The "same ol" is your beloved Howie,
>
>>. But please......enough with
>>"Howard's voice is over-processed." My boy, you're completely clueless in
>>this area. You continually look like a dolt harping on your old,
>>data-lacking topic. NOBODY FUCKING CARES!!!
>
> Does the truth hurt THAT much ?

The truth actually feels good. I'm all for the truth. But the ineptitude
and lack of thought process you put into your writing really hurts. Please
try to write something that other people would want to read. Put yourself
in the reader's position........then maybe you won't post the same
unsubstantiated, data-lacking pronouncements over and over and over again.
Remember......you know nothing about audio processing. You haven't posted
anything to prove otherwise. Obviously, audio processing is not your area
of expertise.

Now think of something interesting to write about. C'mon....you can do it.

[Boom]

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:18:13 -0800, Les Moonves' Chicklet Teeth
<I_lost_my_caps_in_Julie_Chen's_twat@cbs.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 18:04:52 -0500, Hoody wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:29:55 -0800, Les Moonves' Chicklet Teeth
>> <I_lost_my_caps_in_Julie_Chen's_twat@cbs.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:51:18 -0500, Hoody wrote:
>>>
>>>> What about his voice without all of the effects he uses now !!!???
>>>
>>>You know nothing about audio processing. You embarrass yourself
>>>almost on a daily basis because you're clueless on the subject. Please
>>>write about something on which you actually have some awareness. But more
>>>than that, try this:
>>
>> But you never explained it to me !!!
>>>
>>>THINK BEFORE YOU WRITE, HOODY. Ask yourself, "Is ANYONE on earth actually
>>>going to find this interesting, or will I be typing into a vacuum because
>>>I've been plonked pretty consistently by nearly everybody?
>>
>> Take your own advice.
>>
>>>Hoody, people don't have time to read boring crap about nothing.
>>
>> I do it all for you.
>>
>>>the king of that. Why do you think you get so few responses? NOBODY
>>>FUCKING CARES!!! Occasionally, you come up with something original that
>>>isn't the Hoody "same ol', same ol'".
>>
>> The "same ol" is your beloved Howie,
>>
>>>. But please......enough with
>>>"Howard's voice is over-processed." My boy, you're completely clueless in
>>>this area. You continually look like a dolt harping on your old,
>>>data-lacking topic. NOBODY FUCKING CARES!!!
>>
>> Does the truth hurt THAT much ?
>
>The truth actually feels good. I'm all for the truth. But the ineptitude
>and lack of thought process you put into your writing really hurts. Please
>try to write something that other people would want to read. Put yourself
>in the reader's position........then maybe you won't post the same
>unsubstantiated, data-lacking pronouncements over and over and over again.
>Remember......you know nothing about audio processing. You haven't posted
>anything to prove otherwise. Obviously, audio processing is not your area
>of expertise.
>
>Now think of something interesting to write about. C'mon....you can do it.

No he can't. Doody is a complete moron whose little heart was broken
when Howard didn't call him immediately and tell him about his nose
job.

[Hoody]

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:18:13 -0800, Les Moonves' Chicklet Teeth
<I_lost_my_caps_in_Julie_Chen's_twat@cbs.com> wrote:

>> Does the truth hurt THAT much ?
>
>The truth actually feels good. I'm all for the truth. But the ineptitude
>and lack of thought process you put into your writing really hurts. Please
>try to write something that other people would want to read. Put yourself
>in the reader's position........then maybe you won't post the same
>unsubstantiated, data-lacking pronouncements over and over and over again.
>Remember......you know nothing about audio processing. You haven't posted
>anything to prove otherwise. Obviously, audio processing is not your area
>of expertise.
>
>Now think of something interesting to write about. C'mon....you can do it.

But everybody LOVES your explanations of what people don't like. Are
you THAT delusional ?

Please tell us all about audio processing. You have made it clear
that no one knows as much as you, but you haven't told us what you
know.

[Les Moonves' Chicklet Teeth]

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 18:34:20 -0500, Hoody wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:18:13 -0800, Les Moonves' Chicklet Teeth
> <I_lost_my_caps_in_Julie_Chen's_twat@cbs.com> wrote:
>
>>> Does the truth hurt THAT much ?
>>
>>The truth actually feels good. I'm all for the truth. But the ineptitude
>>and lack of thought process you put into your writing really hurts. Please
>>try to write something that other people would want to read. Put yourself
>>in the reader's position........then maybe you won't post the same
>>unsubstantiated, data-lacking pronouncements over and over and over again.
>>Remember......you know nothing about audio processing. You haven't posted
>>anything to prove otherwise. Obviously, audio processing is not your area
>>of expertise.
>>
>>Now think of something interesting to write about. C'mon....you can do it.
>
> But everybody LOVES your explanations of what people don't like. Are
> you THAT delusional ?
>
> Please tell us all about audio processing. You have made it clear
> that no one knows as much as you, but you haven't told us what you
> know.

I know enough to know that you're a clueless twerp.

[Hoody]

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:20:40 GMT, Boom <mmm@nnn.com> wrote:

>>Now think of something interesting to write about. C'mon....you can do it.
>
>No he can't. Doody is a complete moron whose little heart was broken
>when Howard didn't call him immediately and tell him about his nose
>job.

Please teach us about audio processing.
You know ----.

[Hoody]

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:37:45 -0800, Les Moonves' Chicklet Teeth
<I_lost_my_caps_in_Julie_Chen's_twat@cbs.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 18:34:20 -0500, Hoody wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:18:13 -0800, Les Moonves' Chicklet Teeth
>> <I_lost_my_caps_in_Julie_Chen's_twat@cbs.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Does the truth hurt THAT much ?
>>>
>>>The truth actually feels good. I'm all for the truth. But the ineptitude
>>>and lack of thought process you put into your writing really hurts. Please
>>>try to write something that other people would want to read. Put yourself
>>>in the reader's position........then maybe you won't post the same
>>>unsubstantiated, data-lacking pronouncements over and over and over again.
>>>Remember......you know nothing about audio processing. You haven't posted
>>>anything to prove otherwise. Obviously, audio processing is not your area
>>>of expertise.
>>>
>>>Now think of something interesting to write about. C'mon....you can do it.
>>
>> But everybody LOVES your explanations of what people don't like. Are
>> you THAT delusional ?
>>
>> Please tell us all about audio processing. You have made it clear
>> that no one knows as much as you, but you haven't told us what you
>> know.
>
>I know enough to know that you're a clueless twerp.

What about audio processing ? You know so much but haven't said
anything.