Honda Buying XM

[Von Fourche]

What! No talk about the rumor of Honda buying a 25% stake in XM?
What's wrong with you guys?


http://www.orbitcast.com/archives/rumor-honda-making-a-move-for-xm.html

[Rich]

Von Fourche wrote:
> What! No talk about the rumor of Honda buying a 25% stake in XM?
> What's wrong with you guys?
>
>
> http://www.orbitcast.com/archives/rumor-honda-making-a-move-for-xm.html

If Honda were to run by competent management there would be nothing to
discuss except lack of content. We are depressed with the thought.

[Lowdown in Lodi]

>
> What! No talk about the rumor of Honda buying a 25% stake in XM?
> What's wrong with you guys?
>

It is a rumor with no basis in fact, whatsoever.

A document containing a total of about 10 words has somehow been construed
to suggest that Honda may take a larger stake in XM.

If Honda wanted a 25% stake in XM that's fine by me. But this document
relates to a different transaction that occurred some time ago.

XM is an absolute bargain right now. XM is kicking SIRI's ass in every way,
yet valued by the markets at a fraction of SIRI's market cap. SIRI will
lose 1.2-1.3 Billion in '06, close to double what XM will lose. Again.

Institutional buyers have begun to take up positions in XM again; but Honda
isn't one of them.

[CodeMonkey]

Rich wrote:
> If Honda were to run by competent management there would be nothing to
> discuss except lack of content. We are depressed with the thought.

If there was any basis to the rumor of Honda buying XM, we could really
go around about this... But I would really like to know why you think
Honda isn't being run by competent management. Where do you get your facts?

[Rich]

CodeMonkey wrote:
> Rich wrote: Where do you get your facts?

Same place you do, Frontmed; and exchange "XM" for the word "Honda" in
my simple reply to the thread originator.

[CodeMonkey]

Rich wrote:
> CodeMonkey wrote:
>> Rich wrote: Where do you get your facts?
>
> Same place you do, Frontmed; and exchange "XM" for the word "Honda" in
> my simple reply to the thread originator.
>

Frontmed? Dude, lay off the alcohol. It's making you delusional. You
also need to learn how to use your newsgroup reader, because you
obviously can't quote anyone worth a ----.

[Rich]

CodeMonkey wrote:
> Rich wrote:
> > CodeMonkey wrote:
> >> Rich wrote: Where do you get your facts?
> >
> > Same place you do, Frontmed; and exchange "XM" for the word "Honda" in
> > my simple reply to the thread originator.
> >
>
> Frontmed? Dude, lay off the alcohol. It's making you delusional. You
> also need to learn how to use your newsgroup reader, because you
> obviously can't quote anyone worth a ----.



Don't be delusional, I did not say you were Frontmed. Frontmed is a
professional idiot & liar. You are nowhere in the same league as him.


Learn to read.

[CodeMonkey]

Rich wrote:
> CodeMonkey wrote:
>> Rich wrote:
>>> CodeMonkey wrote:
>>>> Rich wrote: Where do you get your facts?
>>> Same place you do, Frontmed; and exchange "XM" for the word "Honda" in
>>> my simple reply to the thread originator.
>>>
>> Frontmed? Dude, lay off the alcohol. It's making you delusional. You
>> also need to learn how to use your newsgroup reader, because you
>> obviously can't quote anyone worth a ----.
>
>
>
> Don't be delusional, I did not say you were Frontmed. Frontmed is a
> professional idiot & liar. You are nowhere in the same league as him.
>
>
> Learn to read.
>

You have to be the biggest moron I have seen here yet. You even top
fafa. Congrats.