Is tomorrow still the day?

[Executioner]

Is tomorrow still the day for the ruling in TTRK's case? Or did I miss something somewhere along the line?

[To The Real King!!]

Hi Executioner and Everyone,

Well it would be more accurate to say tomorrow WAS the day. (today now).

I have good news and bad news. The bad news is that it is very disappointing to us to have the ruling delayed yet again.

The GOOD NEWS is that the Judge himself decided he needed the delay to review the law because we argued it so extensively. He stated precisely that.

To understand this reasoning remember that this is NOT a trial but rather a “preliminary hearing.”


Normally these are ruled about 10,000 to trial for every one that is thrown. The REASON is that the Police do not usually charge without having some evidence of a crime. But in this case its different. The LAW does NOT make this a crime and ONLY government MISINTERPRETATION of that law creates an offence.

So we based one of our MOST POWERFUL arguments on the fact that there is NO LAW BROKEN (along with many other arguments). I wont argue here BUT I ask you to consider WHY this is GOOD NEWS.

The “easy” thing for the Judge to do (done 10,000 times out of 10,001) is to send it on to trial telling himself “ if he is not guilty he will be acquitted at trial.” Now that’s a cop-out but it is OFTEN DONE.

A Judge KNOWS he must have perfect justification to “toss” at this stage as the crown will challenge ANY slight weakness. So if he DOES “toss it” he will likely have a VERY EXTENSIVE judgement written to submit at that time. A great deal of OUR pleading was done in writing and that too will cause him to WRITE it UP. If I win, that too is good as it can be used in other courts, depending on WHAT he finds.

So I am All at once VERY Disappointed in the timing (Because I have a major health issue) and VERY ENCOURAGED by this decision. There can be NO QUESTION that he is taking our stance VERY SERIOUSLY and wants to be SURE he does the right thing. He seems like a VERY CONSCIENTIOUS Judge.

He is also NOT unaware of other rulings coming down the pike in both BC and Quebec and may be looking to THOSE for some additional support to our position.

I am convinced that if ANY Quebec ruling comes FIRST it will be positive but I am VERY CAUTIOUS of the BC court of appeals ruling and I hope that does NOT become an extra burden to The Quebec cases that have been heard now. The issues are slightly different in my case and SOME rulings will PROBABLY be dependent on RULINGS that proceed it, rather than on the case itself. So my HOPES are that judges in Quebec rule FIRST because I attended all three of those trials and on their OWN MERITS they are all Winners. I am less confident about B.C. because I was not present and was told some things that are somewhat negative. That it is TAKING a long time however, is viewed as quite POSITIVE. As its an injunction, there would be sa substantial URGENCY in stopping Canam if THAT was going to happen. Delay in injunction cases usually means the judges do NOT see the case as being urgent (because the plaintiffs are NOT being harmed). Usually!!

So I am STILL pretty shaky until we get the NEXT ruling. Does it EVER END?

I am not sure how much more myself, my wife and family can take of this nerve-wracking suspense that all came through being in the satellite business since 1983. Back to the Doctor for more Tranquilizers :)



My Judge has the integrity of his conviction and he is NOT SURE there is ANY CRIME, just as we argue. SO he wants to REVIEW the LAW and give it further consideration. That’s VERY POSITIVE.

And we have a NEW acquittal and positive ruling to hand in that he has not seen yet. The Krazy Krazy case in Thunder Bay. He did not KNOW about that one when he delayed for more time to study the matter.

So PLEASE keep everything you have CROSSED until the next ruling. That may well tell the tale. I SURE hate depending on someone ELSE’S evidence for a win in my case. We have PROVED that there was no crime. I hope the next ruling is from someone who PROVED the same, such as the other 3 Quebec cases, Gunsmokes, Deummondville and Al’s in Montreal. They are all THREE total WINNERS.

Sorry, But I am so shaky now that I am going to SLEEP a little and hope my headache goes away :)

http://www.legal-rights.org/images/niceday.gif
Thanks & Good Luck,

To The REAL King!!
-----------------------
Freedom has nothing to fear from the truth!

http://www.legal-rights.org/images/lrbanner.gif
Now open with lots of useful resources at your disposal AT:
http://www.legal-rights.org


Newbies PLEASE CLICK HERE and Read (http://www.dsschat.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=26)



[Edited by To The Real King!! on August 25th, 2000 at 10:52 AM]

[Executioner]

[QUOTE]My Judge has the integrity of his conviction and he is NOT SURE there is ANY CRIME, just as we argue. SO he wants to REVIEW the LAW and give it further consideration. That’s VERY POSITIVE.[QUOTE]

Indeed that it a GREAT sign.

Sorry to hear about your health. Just being ill is bad enough by itself WITHOUT the added frustration of a drawn-out court battle.

Best of luck to you and your family in these trying times.

God Bless.

[gunsmoke2]

Delay.. delay.. delay..

How frustrating that can be..

However it might be a positive delay if the Judge needs more time..

He only needs a little excuse to send it on.. so why does he need more time..

Hang in there TTRK.. I can't see anything negative in the delay itself..

Keep the faith..

GS2

[To The Real King!!]

Hi Everyone,

Thanks VERY MUCH for all the support!!

My headache is GONE and I am in PRIME FIGHTING SPIRITS!!

Fear not, I will NEVER give up and those fools will NOT only lose the battle and the war but I will SUE THEIR ASSES for what they have done and I will win that for both me and the public.

I intend to take a “CLASS ACTION” lawsuit against the RCMP and the Government for MISLEADING consumers in getting thousands of Canadians to trade in their perfectly legal American receivers (by scaring Canadians with their FALSE statements) and Commercial advertising for BEV and Star Choice on a GOVERNMENT paid for Web site (You and I pay for it) at

http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/html/satellite-e.htm


What do you think a consumer oriented court would thing of THAT page and ITS statements if it is determined that these are completely legal. What type of a MARKETING PLAN do the RCMP take part in and what is the PAYOFF for them.

And WHAT about BEV and *Choice’s amnesty plans. Just how proper and law-abiding is it to mislead and LIE to Canadian consumers and threaten them with having been LAWBREAKERS when they were not. I don’t think that’s so kosher either.

I am SURE that lawyers will take this case on a contingency basis (because they all CERTAINLY CAN be collected from if we win) and I am just waiting for the final RULINGS before concluding arrangements :D :D :D

The Established SATELLITE industry (that’s US) will win out over these johnny-come-lately pretenders to the throne.

Coercive and threatening marketing using the CRIMINAL LAW FALSELY is not quite approved of in Canada yet :)

http://www.legal-rights.org/images/niceday.gif
Thanks & Good Luck,

To The REAL King!!
-----------------------
Freedom has nothing to fear from the truth!

http://www.legal-rights.org/images/lrbanner.gif
Now open with lots of useful resources at your disposal AT:
http://www.legal-rights.org


Newbies PLEASE CLICK HERE and Read (http://www.dsschat.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=26)


[Edited by To The Real King!! on August 27th, 2000 at 09:20 PM]