To The Real King!!
May 28th, 2001, 02:26 PM
Hi Everyone,
Well I guess you can tell by the headline that I am not too sad today.
Today Judge Boilard of the Superior court of Quebec ruled on the appeal (or more correctly on the Certiorari and Mandamus ) that the crown took out against the ruling where judge Michel Mercier threw out all the charges against myself and my wife.
Well today that was upheld in a ruling "FROM THE BENCH" in the Superior Court. Whats more the judge reiterated what judge Mercier said and in a subtile way he was quite mad at the crown. He again exclaimed that this action should NOT have been brought before him as it was quite clear that Judge Mercier was fully within his jurisdiction when he threw out the charges against us. He stated that EVEN if Judge Mercier was WRONG (but he did not think his decision was wrong) that did not matter as he did not either exceed his jurisdiction, nor did he fail to exercise it.
While they are stubborn (and 4 RCMP officers attended) and may well appeal todays ruling to the Appeals Court of Quebec, there is an extremely remote chance that they could reverse Judge Boilard's ruling, who is a VERY well respected Judge in the Superior court.
I called another lawyer who has an appeal of the Gregory case tomorrow and his excitement was unmistakable when he said Judge Boilard "why HE IS the MAN" in Quebec. Apparently he is the judge who is very often followed in his rulings by other judges. He is very highly considered and I was very lucky to have HIM make the ruling .
So almost 3 years into this battle and I am still fully acquitted (TWICE NOW) as is my Wife (who had nothing to do with my business in the first place) and yet the court STILL retains all of my possessions that are meaningful as well as has a blockage and seizures of over $5 MILLION DOLLARS of my money, not to mention 12,500 Access cards and 30 computers and a truckload of possessions.
So where is justice in all of this. Well the 490 for this is now delayed until September 2001 so it is very hard for me to consider that any form of justice EXCEPT for the very good rulings of our judiciary in both my case and 15 or so OTHER cases now. They have also declared that there is NO OFFENCE known to law because the law DOES NOT make it an offence to decode a signal if it DOES NOT EMANATE from a lawful distributor in Canada. Note that this is NOT the programming where this may be the same but RATHER the SIGNAL. Remember that I don't make the law and in Canada what is NOT prohibited is lawful and permitted. That is the way our society works.
This is NOT a complaint and I have dealt with this health issue in my head. I have also been VERY reticent to mention this in public but the Crown and Government are FULLY aware that (and I will mention it here this once) I have a terminal malignant, recurrent thymoma which is a Cancer that is terminal. The life span projection is 90% of people with this condition are Dead in 5 years and I am in my 6th year living on borrowed time. I take 400 mg of morphine (or rather I am allowed to by prescription, DAILY). I try not too and I often succeed but often I have to for the pain. I don't like to mention this but it just happens that very recently a new drug called "GLEEVEC" was released that is very likely to be positive for my Cancer. It is a anti-angiogenesis drug which I have followed for over 3 years now KNOWING that it is my ONLY hope (any of the anti-angiogenesis drugs.) Recently 86 of 89 patients with various Cancers were put into remission and in some of the cases no sign of the original causes of the Cancers were determinable as they usually are. This drug was RUSHED through the approval process because of the stage 1 reports and apparently the stage 2 reports are EVEN MORE favorable.
Unfortunately the cost of treatment is in the area of $2400.00 US monthly and this most likely for the rest of my life, especially if it is successful. However without my life savings I have no means whatsoever to have this treatment and no hope of getting it and TIME is of the essence. The CROWN KNOWS THIS and thus I expect them to again appeal todays ruling. When they seized my wifes 3 cars last year, I had just completed major surgery to have my diaphragm and 4 cancerous tumors attached to it removed and the diaphragm replaced with some artificial fabric. They KNEW I needed treatment 3 or more days a WEEK and live 50 MILES from the hospital. Without transportation HOW could I get treatment. Well LUCKILY I have many good friends who got together and drove me in for all the treatments while other friends picked up my 7 year old daughter at her school or lent us a car to do that with. But there is no way I will impose on my friends to loan me the money for these treatments. I already owe them well over $100,000.00 for my defence and I will not borrow more than I can hope to pay back in my lifetime.
The Crown KNEW this as they had been told the previous Friday (I forbid my lawyer to tell them UNTIL I knew I survived the operation (chancy) and he did that as was his obligation on a Friday. On MONDAY the trucks arrived to take 3 cars which were on the road but they DID NOT seize three other cars (2 corvettes and a jaguar) all collection cars that were not licensed at the time. Does that make any statement?
But is the CROWN entitled to impose a DEATH SENTENCE on me by appealing me to death (literally) and making sure that I do not get back my money and thus cannot get treatment??? Some of you may not believe they will knowingly do this but I ASSURE YOU that it is part of their plan just as the automobile seizures were designed to stop my getting treatment after a very major operation.
My lawyer Mr. Ian Angus ( a fabulous and ultra ethical lawyer bye the way) will work with me this evening in order that we figure out some way to make a pleading that brings this matter to the courts attention and tries to get back some of my money to obtain this treatment and to pay professional fees which should have NEVER been withheld in order for me to defend myself and my wife.
A side issue is that iIusually have 4 lawyers in court. Mr. ----, Mr. Joe, Mr. Angus and Miss leanne who makes notes and keeps records of everything (and writes fantastic submissions). But I have had to cut back due to budget limitations and I selected Mr. Angus to fight this. Ms. Leanne was there again today but Mr. Angus fought the WHOLE THING single handedly and made all the written submissions and obviously did a WONDERFUL JOB. Great success Ian and many thanks from both myself and my wife who agreed with my choice. He was up against 2 crown lawyers (the visible part) and an untold number of other ones back at the office and the incredible resources of the STATE. And HE, single handedly "WHACKED them OUT". Congrats and thanks Ian.
This is after all, about TELEVISION and I have now been acquitted TWICE and STILL the government proceeds to prosecute (persecute) me and my wife BECAUSE they are trying to get my MONEY as "proceeds of crime". This is who governs us. People who would impose a DEATH SENTENCE on someone who has been acquitted twice of the TERRIBLE CRIME of programming TV cards so that I and my clients can watch American TV, Disney or whatever that we CANNOT BUY in Canada at ANY PRICE and which is clearly NOT against the law in Canada. Over 16 courts up to the Appeals Court in Provinces covering some 60% of the population of Canada including the Ontario, BC, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Nova Scotia. Provincial and Superior courts have ruled in most of the Others and ALL of them in OUR FAVOR.
That is who they are and if it does not make you mad to hear this in the year 2001, then I have to let you know that in MY opinion they are a bunch of
http://www.legal-rights.org/images/tukas.gif
for the least if not a bunch of
http://www.legal-rights.org/images/hiena.jpg
Sorry if I sound harsh and I am NOT exaggerating one bit but why else would the crown appeal when so many rulings across the country have made it clear that my business was NOT against the law. I don't MAKE the law, I just follow it and I did. Neither my wife or myself have EVER done a CRIME in Canada or elsewhere that is more serious than a speeding ticket. Is THIS the way Canada treats Citizens.
YES IT IS and if I were any other Canadian that would have me VERY WORRIED at this time. Its certainly not a very emancipated way to think in a country that is supposedly known for its "human rights" position in the western world.
Just my opinion on this.
http://www.legal-rights.org/images/niceday.gif
Thanks & Good Luck,
To The REAL King!!
-----------------------
Freedom has nothing to fear from the truth!
http://www.legal-rights.org/images/bllrbanner.gif
Please DONATE for the SUPREME COURT BATTLE AS I DID (http://www.legal-rights.org/donation.html)<---CLICK here
http://www.dsschat.com/index2.html
http://www.legal-rights.org
Typos corrected and a little more added :)[Edited by To The Real King!! on May 28th, 2001 at 09:41 PM]
Well I guess you can tell by the headline that I am not too sad today.
Today Judge Boilard of the Superior court of Quebec ruled on the appeal (or more correctly on the Certiorari and Mandamus ) that the crown took out against the ruling where judge Michel Mercier threw out all the charges against myself and my wife.
Well today that was upheld in a ruling "FROM THE BENCH" in the Superior Court. Whats more the judge reiterated what judge Mercier said and in a subtile way he was quite mad at the crown. He again exclaimed that this action should NOT have been brought before him as it was quite clear that Judge Mercier was fully within his jurisdiction when he threw out the charges against us. He stated that EVEN if Judge Mercier was WRONG (but he did not think his decision was wrong) that did not matter as he did not either exceed his jurisdiction, nor did he fail to exercise it.
While they are stubborn (and 4 RCMP officers attended) and may well appeal todays ruling to the Appeals Court of Quebec, there is an extremely remote chance that they could reverse Judge Boilard's ruling, who is a VERY well respected Judge in the Superior court.
I called another lawyer who has an appeal of the Gregory case tomorrow and his excitement was unmistakable when he said Judge Boilard "why HE IS the MAN" in Quebec. Apparently he is the judge who is very often followed in his rulings by other judges. He is very highly considered and I was very lucky to have HIM make the ruling .
So almost 3 years into this battle and I am still fully acquitted (TWICE NOW) as is my Wife (who had nothing to do with my business in the first place) and yet the court STILL retains all of my possessions that are meaningful as well as has a blockage and seizures of over $5 MILLION DOLLARS of my money, not to mention 12,500 Access cards and 30 computers and a truckload of possessions.
So where is justice in all of this. Well the 490 for this is now delayed until September 2001 so it is very hard for me to consider that any form of justice EXCEPT for the very good rulings of our judiciary in both my case and 15 or so OTHER cases now. They have also declared that there is NO OFFENCE known to law because the law DOES NOT make it an offence to decode a signal if it DOES NOT EMANATE from a lawful distributor in Canada. Note that this is NOT the programming where this may be the same but RATHER the SIGNAL. Remember that I don't make the law and in Canada what is NOT prohibited is lawful and permitted. That is the way our society works.
This is NOT a complaint and I have dealt with this health issue in my head. I have also been VERY reticent to mention this in public but the Crown and Government are FULLY aware that (and I will mention it here this once) I have a terminal malignant, recurrent thymoma which is a Cancer that is terminal. The life span projection is 90% of people with this condition are Dead in 5 years and I am in my 6th year living on borrowed time. I take 400 mg of morphine (or rather I am allowed to by prescription, DAILY). I try not too and I often succeed but often I have to for the pain. I don't like to mention this but it just happens that very recently a new drug called "GLEEVEC" was released that is very likely to be positive for my Cancer. It is a anti-angiogenesis drug which I have followed for over 3 years now KNOWING that it is my ONLY hope (any of the anti-angiogenesis drugs.) Recently 86 of 89 patients with various Cancers were put into remission and in some of the cases no sign of the original causes of the Cancers were determinable as they usually are. This drug was RUSHED through the approval process because of the stage 1 reports and apparently the stage 2 reports are EVEN MORE favorable.
Unfortunately the cost of treatment is in the area of $2400.00 US monthly and this most likely for the rest of my life, especially if it is successful. However without my life savings I have no means whatsoever to have this treatment and no hope of getting it and TIME is of the essence. The CROWN KNOWS THIS and thus I expect them to again appeal todays ruling. When they seized my wifes 3 cars last year, I had just completed major surgery to have my diaphragm and 4 cancerous tumors attached to it removed and the diaphragm replaced with some artificial fabric. They KNEW I needed treatment 3 or more days a WEEK and live 50 MILES from the hospital. Without transportation HOW could I get treatment. Well LUCKILY I have many good friends who got together and drove me in for all the treatments while other friends picked up my 7 year old daughter at her school or lent us a car to do that with. But there is no way I will impose on my friends to loan me the money for these treatments. I already owe them well over $100,000.00 for my defence and I will not borrow more than I can hope to pay back in my lifetime.
The Crown KNEW this as they had been told the previous Friday (I forbid my lawyer to tell them UNTIL I knew I survived the operation (chancy) and he did that as was his obligation on a Friday. On MONDAY the trucks arrived to take 3 cars which were on the road but they DID NOT seize three other cars (2 corvettes and a jaguar) all collection cars that were not licensed at the time. Does that make any statement?
But is the CROWN entitled to impose a DEATH SENTENCE on me by appealing me to death (literally) and making sure that I do not get back my money and thus cannot get treatment??? Some of you may not believe they will knowingly do this but I ASSURE YOU that it is part of their plan just as the automobile seizures were designed to stop my getting treatment after a very major operation.
My lawyer Mr. Ian Angus ( a fabulous and ultra ethical lawyer bye the way) will work with me this evening in order that we figure out some way to make a pleading that brings this matter to the courts attention and tries to get back some of my money to obtain this treatment and to pay professional fees which should have NEVER been withheld in order for me to defend myself and my wife.
A side issue is that iIusually have 4 lawyers in court. Mr. ----, Mr. Joe, Mr. Angus and Miss leanne who makes notes and keeps records of everything (and writes fantastic submissions). But I have had to cut back due to budget limitations and I selected Mr. Angus to fight this. Ms. Leanne was there again today but Mr. Angus fought the WHOLE THING single handedly and made all the written submissions and obviously did a WONDERFUL JOB. Great success Ian and many thanks from both myself and my wife who agreed with my choice. He was up against 2 crown lawyers (the visible part) and an untold number of other ones back at the office and the incredible resources of the STATE. And HE, single handedly "WHACKED them OUT". Congrats and thanks Ian.
This is after all, about TELEVISION and I have now been acquitted TWICE and STILL the government proceeds to prosecute (persecute) me and my wife BECAUSE they are trying to get my MONEY as "proceeds of crime". This is who governs us. People who would impose a DEATH SENTENCE on someone who has been acquitted twice of the TERRIBLE CRIME of programming TV cards so that I and my clients can watch American TV, Disney or whatever that we CANNOT BUY in Canada at ANY PRICE and which is clearly NOT against the law in Canada. Over 16 courts up to the Appeals Court in Provinces covering some 60% of the population of Canada including the Ontario, BC, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Nova Scotia. Provincial and Superior courts have ruled in most of the Others and ALL of them in OUR FAVOR.
That is who they are and if it does not make you mad to hear this in the year 2001, then I have to let you know that in MY opinion they are a bunch of
http://www.legal-rights.org/images/tukas.gif
for the least if not a bunch of
http://www.legal-rights.org/images/hiena.jpg
Sorry if I sound harsh and I am NOT exaggerating one bit but why else would the crown appeal when so many rulings across the country have made it clear that my business was NOT against the law. I don't MAKE the law, I just follow it and I did. Neither my wife or myself have EVER done a CRIME in Canada or elsewhere that is more serious than a speeding ticket. Is THIS the way Canada treats Citizens.
YES IT IS and if I were any other Canadian that would have me VERY WORRIED at this time. Its certainly not a very emancipated way to think in a country that is supposedly known for its "human rights" position in the western world.
Just my opinion on this.
http://www.legal-rights.org/images/niceday.gif
Thanks & Good Luck,
To The REAL King!!
-----------------------
Freedom has nothing to fear from the truth!
http://www.legal-rights.org/images/bllrbanner.gif
Please DONATE for the SUPREME COURT BATTLE AS I DID (http://www.legal-rights.org/donation.html)<---CLICK here
http://www.dsschat.com/index2.html
http://www.legal-rights.org
Typos corrected and a little more added :)[Edited by To The Real King!! on May 28th, 2001 at 09:41 PM]