PDA

View Full Version : DTV's New weapon against Piracy


gunsmoke2
June 28th, 2001, 02:45 PM
DIRECTV Seizes Signal Theft Equipment from Businesses Nationwide

Seizures are the First Under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act; Multiple Civil Suits Target Illegal Activity on the Internet

El Segundo, Jun 27, 2001 -- As part of its escalated campaign to curb satellite signal piracy, DIRECTV, Inc. recently executed civil seizure and impoundment orders against several businesses and individuals across the United States, and seized several truckloads of equipment used to illegally reprogram DIRECTV access cards and steal DIRECTV® programming signals.
These seizures, believed to be the first under the provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998, were conducted in connection with suits filed in U.S. District Court in California against multiple targets in California, Texas and Florida. The most prominent targets were Santa Ana-based Fulfillment Plus; WhiteViper Technologies and American Card Programmers of Anaheim; and the defendants believed to have links to those businesses. They include: Derek E. Trone, WhiteViper Technologies, Future Capital Corp.; Jennifer and William Zinn, Mailroom & More; Bruce Allen Turner, Vector Technologies, Inc., Global Capital Corp.; Jim Stevens, American Card Programmers; Robert Meadows, MEADCO; and Scott Madzig, Fulfillment Plus, Parcel Handlers Ltd.

According to the complaints filed in these cases, the defendants advertised and sold signal theft devices over the Internet and provided and listed programs and instructions for illegally modifying DIRECTV access cards. The targets of the civil seizure and impoundment orders in these cases have included the operators of the Web sites, as well as the manufacturing and distribution sites that supported the Internet businesses.

Members of the DIRECTV Office of Signal Integrity, Engineering and Legal departments conducted the seizures, with support from federal, state and local law enforcement entities.

"The use of civil seizures under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act is a significant new weapon in our fight against signal piracy," said Larry Rissler, vice president, Office of Signal Integrity for DIRECTV, Inc. "By using this statute, we are able to seize equipment or property without prior notice, before there is an opportunity to destroy or hide evidence. We expect to conduct many more raids of this kind in the future against targets big and small."

In addition to the Digital Millenium Copyright Act, the complaints have also included claims under the Federal Communications Act, Federal Wiretap laws and the California Penal and Civil Codes.

After ordering the seizure and impoundment of illegal devices, the courts in all cases have now issued either temporary restraining orders or preliminary injunctions, barring the defendants from continuing to conduct business over the Internet or by any other means. Other websites shut down as a result of these orders include www.axxessplus.com, and www.huexpress.com.

DIRECTV's intensified campaign to protect the security of its signal includes civil actions and criminal referrals, frequent raids in cooperation with local, state and federal law enforcement agencies and the transmission of electronic counter-measures, designed to disable illegally modified access cards.


GS2

RadDoc
June 28th, 2001, 03:53 PM
H.R. 2281 - Passed by Congress on 12 October 1998.

Signed into law by Clinton on 28 October 1998.

The Act was designed to implement treaties signed at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Geneva convention during December 1996.

Key provisions:
Makes it a crime to circumvent anti-piracy measures built into most commercial software. Outlaws the manufacture, sale, or distribution of code-cracking devices used to illegally copy software. Does permit the cracking of copyright protection devices to conduct encryption research, assess product interoperability, and test computer security systems. Provides exemptions for non-profit libraries, archives, and educational institutions. Limits liability of non-profit institutions of higher education for copyright infringement by faculty members or graduate students. Limits internet service providers from liability for simply transmitting information over the internet. However, service providers are expected to remove materiel that appears to constitute copyright infringement from users' web sites. Requires "webcasters" to pay royalty fees to record companies.

Full text: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c105:H.R.2281.ENR:

rbryant3
June 28th, 2001, 04:59 PM
Yep, here we go more fuel to the fire!

Well looks like new strategy on DTV’s part to charge websites with copyright infringement.

Also looks like they are going to use it on dealers like the Anton Pillar was used on the fast one. Grab everyone’s stock for evidence and bring civil and criminal charges on copyright next.


http://www.nraila.org/images/fredom.jpg

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.[[Edited by rbryant3 on June 28th, 2001 at 04:05 PM]

freeman00
June 29th, 2001, 12:05 AM
Originally posted by RadDoc
H.R. 2281 - Passed by Congress on 12 October 1998.

Signed into law by Clinton on 28 October 1998.

The Act was designed to implement treaties signed at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Geneva convention during December 1996.

Key provisions:
Makes it a crime to circumvent anti-piracy measures built into most commercial software. Outlaws the manufacture, sale, or distribution of code-cracking devices used to illegally copy software. Does permit the cracking of copyright protection devices to conduct encryption research, assess product interoperability, and test computer security systems. Provides exemptions for non-profit libraries, archives, and educational institutions. Limits liability of non-profit institutions of higher education for copyright infringement by faculty members or graduate students. Limits internet service providers from liability for simply transmitting information over the internet. However, service providers are expected to remove materiel that appears to constitute copyright infringement from users' web sites. Requires "webcasters" to pay royalty fees to record companies.

Full text: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c105:H.R.2281.ENR:


Does permit the cracking of copyright protection devices to conduct encryption research, assess product interoperability, and test computer security systems.

This is what I'm doing researching the H cards interoperability :)

To The Real King!!
June 29th, 2001, 04:33 PM
Hi Guys,

One downside for them at first is that there is no precedent. I suspect software companies will be the first to use it and that it may not be so simple to get convictions under.

I wonder if there is any advantage since the regular laws have some precedent and seem harsher in the sentences. I guess we will see :)

They seem to be trying to enforce some law that permits them to disallow people to reprogram their cards for other uses but so long as the other use is not stealing satellite TV, I cannot see how they can succeed.

In Canada they continuously parrot that "they do not authorize anyone to reprogram their cards" but the courts just laugh as if to say "who needs any authorization from you"? Many products are used in ways that were not envisioned but who cares. Who cares if you use "lighter fluid" as a nail polish remover" or a DSS card as a "security lock" to prevent access to your PC. They have no right to prohibit that usage.

http://www.legal-rights.org/images/niceday.gif
Thanks & Good Luck,

To The REAL King!!
-----------------------
Freedom has nothing to fear from the truth!

http://www.legal-rights.org/images/bllrbanner.gif

Please DONATE for the SUPREME COURT BATTLE AS I DID (http://www.legal-rights.org/donation.html)<---CLICK here

http://www.dsschat.com/index2.html

http://www.legal-rights.org